RE: [PATCH] advice: warn when sparse index expands

>On 7/3/24 2:16 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Typically, forcing a sparse index to expand to a full index means
>>> that Git could not determine the status of a file outside of the
>>> sparse-checkout and needed to expand sparse trees into the full list
>>> of sparse blobs. This operation can be very slow when the
>>> sparse-checkout is much smaller than the full tree at HEAD.
>>>
>>> When users are in this state, it is common that 'git status' will
>>> report the problem. Usually there is a modified or untracked file
>>> outside of the sparse-checkout mentioned by the 'git status' output.
>>> There are a number of reasons why this is insufficient:
>>
>> Nicely written to explain why giving an advice message is a good idea
>> to cover this situation.
>>
>> Making it possible to squelch comes with no cost (once the code to do
>> so is written), so I do not have a huge problem with the use of
>> advise_if_enabled(), but I offhand do not know if the users would ever
>> want to squelch it.  Is this something that users would choose to say
>> "yes, I know what I am doing is making my sparse working tree
>> unusuably slow and I've heard how to whip my sparse working tree into
>> a better shape already---please do not tell it to me ever again;
>> because I need to leave these crufts outside the sparse cone anyway, I
>> am willing to accept the unusually slow response, overhead, and wasted
>> cycles and power" to?
>
>I currently can't imagine a case where a user would want to disable this advice, but I
>defaulted to allowing it. I suppose it is more difficult to remove that option later, so I
>should have defaulted to not having it removable via config.
>
>I can send a v2 without the config option present. (I'll wait a day or two to see if
>others have strong opinions.)