Re: Bug? url.insteadOf overwrites remote.pushUrl
- From
Kirill Likhodedov <kirill.likhodedov@jetbrains.com>
- Date
- Oct 14, 2011, 19:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <0656F8BA-3B41-473D-88A6-6A703C9A9CED@jetbrains.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4E9856BD.3010807@drmicha.warpmail.net>
>> On the other hand, pushInsteadOf doesn't >> override explicit pushUrl. Is it a bug? > > That is as described in the thread (thanks for linking to it).
Show 6 quoted lines
> pushurl predates pushinsteadof, and when the latter was introduced, one > could have argued for or against "insteadof" being applied to pushurls. > But that was necessary before, and existing behavior at the time when > pushinsteadof was introduced. So, I don't see a bug, nor anything we > could change now, though arguably most people use either pushinstead of > or pushurl, but not both.
Yeah, that's clear now. As I already answered to Junio in another thread, my question was only about insteadOf, not pushInsteadOf behavior. The behavior of pushInsteadOf is completely clear from the thread and from t5516-fetch-push.sh Sorry for making it not clear enough.
Anyway, thanks for giving a one more explanation and example on how url, pushUrl and insteadOf configs work, it is always useful to go though it once again.