RE: Git 2.54.0-rc1, subtests of t5310, t5326, t5327

>On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 12:25:47PM -0400, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>
>> This is also impacting t5608 and t7700. Anywhere where writev() is
>> used, seemingly. We went through MAX_IO_SIZE issues years ago, instead
>> of using ssize_t as a basis of how big communication is. I think
>> writev() is not valid. It worked on Lunix, but had issues elsewhere.
>> This broke the compat layer.
>
>I wondered briefly if the problem could be that we're violating MAX_IO_SIZE here,
>as our use of writev() does not respect it at all. But the only spot that uses it is
>feeding pkt-line packets, which max out at 64k. So unless your MAX_IO_SIZE is
>smaller than that, I doubt that is the problem.