Show 63 quoted lines
>On Thu, Nov 24 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> [CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>>
>>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a
>>> condition
>>> where:
>>
>> Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
>>
>>> <snip>
>>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual test_config_global
>>> + trace2.perfBrief 1 pwd test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
>>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
>>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
>>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>>>
>>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this
>>> would be helpful.
>>
>> Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because
>> that's all that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere.
>> Running the test with that:
>>
>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>> error: last command exited with $?=128
>>
>> For that all that's needed is this:
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
>> --- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
>> have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
>> '
>>
>> -test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
>> have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
>> '
>>
>> -test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
>> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
>> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>>
>> I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.
>
>I submitted a fix at
>https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-1.1-f7f21c94a6c-20221124T214813Z-
>avarab@gmail.com/;
>but I see that since your message-id's contain "$" I got the In-Reply-To wrong,
>sorry :)