RE: [PATCH] git-explain
- From
- Raimund Bauer <ray@softwarelandschaft.com>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2006, 09:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <001b01c7184d$5d142c20$0b0aa8c0@abf.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1wnekh6a.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
> An issue with this approach is that this can be the beginning > of hardwiring the official "right way of doing things" in the > set of tools. Pursuing this approach would enhance the set > of state markers like "FAILED_MERGE" in the example, which means:
Wouldn't it be better to create some kind of action-log (that's cleared at the end of the command if everything was all right) instead of creating special markers for different commands?
That way there would be only 1 place to check for what happened ...
-- best regards Ray