RE: [Failure] Re: git 2.40.0-rc1

From: rsbecker@nexbridge.com <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Date: Mar 2, 2023, 19:41 UTC
Message-ID: <001a01d94d3f$04c2e460$0e48ad20$@nexbridge.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh6v3j8n1.fsf@gitster.g>

On Thursday, March 2, 2023 1:44 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 20 quoted lines

><rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
>
>> Git 2.40.0-rc2 was a regression from rc1. The following new tests failed:
>>
>> t3206 - virtually all subtests failed. An example of this failure is a
>> results comparison in subtest 1 (seemingly relating to abbreviation):
>> + test_cmp expect actual
>> --- expect      2023-03-02 16:39:23 +0000
>> +++ actual      2023-03-02 16:39:23 +0000
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -1:  4de457d = 1:  35b9b25 s/5/A/
>> -2:  fccce22 = 2:  de345ab s/4/A/
>> -3:  147e64e = 3:  9af6654 s/11/B/
>> -4:  a63e992 = 4:  2901f77 s/12/B/
>> +1:  4de457d2c0d218f48d66f45f9b30f3aa62562105 = 1:
>> 35b9b25f76d404d09a23e6c8efa96c3ce19e19aa s/5/A/
>
>Are any big endian machines involved?
>
>cf. https://lore.kernel.org/git/Y%2F+paI8WGSmEbv%2Fw@pobox.com/

Oh yes. All NonStop variants are big-endian. That hasn't changed the SHA-1 signatures though.