RE: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.21.0-rc2

> "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
> 
> > On February 19, 2019 18:29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> A release candidate Git v2.21.0-rc2 is now available for testing at
> >> the usual places.  It is comprised of 474 non-merge commits since
> >> v2.20.0, contributed by 61 people, 16 of which are new faces.
> >
> > Thanks. t5562 works properly on NonStop (3 tests under various loads).
> > I am starting a full regression test now - see you in two days or so
> > with a full report.
> 
> Thanks.  In the end I ended up doing the following:
> 
>  - kept most of your "feed NULs generated from a helper program via
>    pipe, instead of reading from /dev/zero" patch,
> 
>  - replaced the helper program used in the above with the test-tool
>    one by Dscho,
> 
>  - used Max's "do not reuse the output file---the background writer
>    about to die may still have it open when the next test starts",
> 
>  - used Max's "when testing the program with overly large input
>    declared with content-length, do not have to feed from /dev/zero;
>    /dev/null suffices as a mistaken program attempting to read would
>    die when seeing EOF anyway" patch to reduce one mention of
>    /dev/zero (or one pipe from the helper output) further.
> 
> Hopefully Dscho's Azure thing would also be happy with one less use of

> real bug on platforms without /dev/zero in t4153:
> 
>     $ git grep -h dev/zero t/
>             test_must_fail test_terminal git am --3way </dev/zero &&
>             test_must_fail test_terminal git am --reject </dev/zero &&
> 
> Curiously, applying the attached patch and running the test on Linux would
> notice that we do not have such a device file, and the use of

> does *not* make it a-OK [*].  I am not sure why you are not getting hit by
> the same issue.
> 
> 	Side note: test_must_fail is to ensure that the command
> 	exits in a controlled way without segfault, so at the first
> 	glance, replacing /dev/zero with something nonsensical and
> 	nonexistent ought to make the command pass, but that is not
> 	the case.  The shell notices redirection failure and aborts
> 	the &&-chain.  This behaviour matches what we want, so I
> 	won't complain ;-)
> 
> Another mention of /dev/zero appears in t/helper/test-sha1.sh (not to be
> confused with t/helper/test-sha1.c).  This seems to be run only with an
> explicit "make -C t/helper check-sha1" request, so perhaps nobody on your
> platform ran it to get hit by it.  I wonder if anybody runs this on any

> framework to verify and bench sha1 implementations.", 2006-06-24).
> 
>  t/t4153-am-resume-override-opts.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/t/t4153-am-resume-override-opts.sh b/t/t4153-am-resume-
> override-opts.sh
> index 8ea22d1bcb..29ef22c94f 100755
> --- a/t/t4153-am-resume-override-opts.sh
> +++ b/t/t4153-am-resume-override-opts.sh
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ test_expect_success TTY '--3way overrides --no-3way' '
> 
>  	# Applying side1 with am --3way will succeed due to the threeway-
> merge.
>  	# Applying side2 will fail as --3way does not apply to it.
> -	test_must_fail test_terminal git am --3way </dev/zero &&
> +	test_must_fail test_terminal git am --3way </dev/zarro &&
>  	test_path_is_dir .git/rebase-apply &&
>  	test side1 = "$(cat file2)"
>  '
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ test_expect_success TTY '--reject overrides --no-reject'
> '
>  	test_path_is_dir .git/rebase-apply &&
>  	test_path_is_missing file.rej &&
> 
> -	test_must_fail test_terminal git am --reject </dev/zero &&
> +	test_must_fail test_terminal git am --reject </dev/zarro &&
>  	test_path_is_dir .git/rebase-apply &&
>  	test_path_is_file file.rej
>  '