RE: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14)
- From
Joachim Schmitz <jojo@schmitz-digital.de>
- Date
- Sep 15, 2012, 17:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <001101cd9365$b2d8e030$188aa090$@schmitz-digital.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4nmz1aqi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Show 27 quoted lines
> From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gitster@pobox.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 7:01 PM > To: Joachim Schmitz > Cc: git@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14) > > "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo@schmitz-digital.de> writes: > > > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I think we can start thinking about feature freeze once the topics > >> in 'next' that are scheduled to graduate to 'master' already are > >> fully cooked. For any late-coming topic, there always is the next > >> cycle ;-) > > > > I've not hear anything about my poll patches and I'd really like them > > to into 1.8.x. > > I've seen some patches on "poll" posted, were discussed and had > threads titled "Re: [PATCH] ...". But I didn't see a rerolled > "[PATCH v2 n/m] ..." series that states that it is a rerolled > "hopefully final version" that addresses all the points that were > brought up during the discussion that need to be addressed. > > I do not necessarily follow all the minute details of all discussion > threads. For this particular series, I not know which ones of your > "poll patches" turned out to be unneeded, which ones turned out to > be fine as posted originally and which ones needed updating.
There were several iterations up to [PATCH v4 n/4] and only one foreign comment to it (and to some commented code) and one self-comment about the order of patches, but none about technical correctness, none that I remember at least.
I can post a v5 series which will - move compat/win32/poll.[ch] to compat/poll/ and adjust Makefile - #ifdef some WIN32 specific #include (should this be done in one step with the above?) - fix the 2 bugs in poll.c just like they got fixed in gnulib's version (would you want this in one or two steps?)
Bye, Jojo