Caleb Cushing
Posts as xenoterracide@gmail.com.
75
messages
2
patches posted
0%
of 2 series merged
26
threads started
2008
first message, May 14, 2008
Nov 19, 2024
since the latest message
Patch series
Of 2 patch series (re-rolls counted once), 0 landed on master and 2 did not.
- not mergedmergetool merge/skip/abort at promptJan 28, 2009
- not mergedmergetool merge/skip/abortJan 21, 2009
A series is merged when one of its patches matches a commit on master by the same author, by subject. Versions are linked when they share a patch subject. Patches reworded before landing, or applied under someone else's name, count as not merged.
Recent emails
- Re: git remote set-head automatically
- Re: git remote set-head automatically
- git remote set-head automatically
- Re: git push origin error (1.6.3 new default functionality)
- Re: git push origin error (1.6.3 new default functionality)
- git push origin error (1.6.3 new default functionality)
- Re: cygwin - clone on repo fails
- Re: auto commit merge using the default merge message
- Re: auto commit merge using the default merge message
- cygwin - clone on repo fails
- auto commit merge using the default merge message
- Re: git-new-workdir not working right?
- git-new-workdir not working right?
- can't clone repo with cygwin 1.7.0
- Re: Google Summer of Code 2009: GIT
- Re: Google Summer of Code 2009: GIT
- Re: BUG: git can't handle certain kinds of renames in merges
- BUG: git can't handle certain kinds of renames in merges
- Re: fatal: git write-tree failed to write a tree
- Re: fatal: git write-tree failed to write a tree
- Re: fatal: git write-tree failed to write a tree
- merge, keeping the remote as a new file?
- fatal: git write-tree failed to write a tree
- FEATURE suggestion git commit --amend <ref>
- Re: how do I resolve this merge manually + mergetool bug
- Re: how do I resolve this merge manually + mergetool bug
- Re: how do I resolve this merge manually + mergetool bug
- how do I resolve this merge manually + mergetool bug
- Re: merge smart enough to adapt to renames?
- Re: merge smart enough to adapt to renames?