Dave Huseby
Posts as dwh@linuxprogrammer.org.
27
messages
5
patches posted
0%
of 2 series merged
6
threads started
2019
first message, Sep 27, 2019
Jun 18, 2021
since the latest message
Patch series
Of 2 patch series (re-rolls counted once), 0 landed on master and 2 did not.
- not mergedWriting down mail list etiquette.v3, May 12, 2021
- not mergedUniversal cryptographic signingMay 8, 2021
A series is merged when one of its patches matches a commit on master by the same author, by subject. Versions are linked when they share a patch subject. Patches reworded before landing, or applied under someone else's name, count as not merged.
Recent emails
- Re: [PATCH v3] doc: writing down Git mailing list etiquette
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] SubmittingPatches: remove pine-specific hints from MUA hints
- Re: Is the sha256 object format experimental or not?
- Re: Is the sha256 object format experimental or not?
- Re: Is the sha256 object format experimental or not?
- Re: Is the sha256 object format experimental or not?
- Re: Is the sha256 object format experimental or not?
- Re: [PATCH v3] doc: writing down Git mailing list etiquette
- Re: [RFC doc] Tracking git.git
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] SubmittingPatches: remove pine-specific hints from MUA hints
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] SubmittingPatches: remove pine-specific hints from MUA hints
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] SubmittingPatches: remove pine-specific hints from MUA hints
- doc: writing down Git mailing list etiquette
- Writing down mail list etiquette.
- (no subject)
- (no subject)
- Re: [PATCH v1] Writing down mail list etiquette.
- Writing down mail list etiquette.
- Modifies documentation for universal cryptographic signing
- Universal cryptographic signing
- Preserving the ability to have both SHA1 and SHA256 signatures
- Re: Pain points in Git's patch flow
- Re: Pain points in Git's patch flow
- Oops! Sorry
- pkt-line and LF terminated lines of data
- Re: GPG Commit Signing Project
- Re: RFC: Cryptographic attestation for email-based patch workflows