threads / discuss / 9567

Extending .gitignore

Subject: Extending .gitignore

## tl;dr

2 messages between Aug 18, 2007 and Aug 18, 2007.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Dmitry Kakurin· Aug 18, 2007, 09:43 UTC · lore
Currently .gitignore serves (at least) 2 purposes:
1. Specifies which files to ignore during git add
2. Specifies which files to ignore during git cleanup, but still deletes them with git cleanup -x
So it effectively splits files in 2 categories.
I always find myself with 3 categories of files:
1. Important files that I want tracked by SCM (normal files like *.c)
2. Unimportant files that I want ignored by SCM and cleaned (usually build files like *.obj, *.exe)
3. Important files that I don't want to be tracked by SCM but also I don't want them to be cleaned either (these are usually 
machine-specific config files)

So I want to be able to say to git: don't track this file, but don't delete it either (even with clean -x). What do you think? Does it make sense? Can it be done right now?

- Dmitry 
Junio C Hamano· Aug 18, 2007, 10:00 UTC · re: Dmitry Kakurin · lore

Re: Extending .gitignore

Dmitry Kakurin <dmitry.kakurin@gmail.com> writes:
> So I want to be able to say to git: don't track this file, but don't delete it either (even with clean -x).
> What do you think? Does it make sense? Can it be done right now?

I've said that we would need .precious in addition to .ignore; no objection at all, except "even with clean -x" part which may be a controversial detail.

Can it be done right now? Of course not. That is definitely a post 1.5.3 item.

But the beauty of the distributednes of git is that _you_ can start working on it without disturbing anybody else nor worrying about the stabilization freeze period.

Me, personally I would prefer to see people spending their time to find regressions in -rc and fixing them before the release, though...

← back to recent threads