threads / patch / 8992

patch, 4 partsThe rest of builtin-fetch

Subject: [PATCH 0/4] The rest of builtin-fetch

## tl;dr

3 messages between Jul 12, 2007 and Jul 12, 2007. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 2people: 2as markdown or json

Daniel Barkalow· Jul 12, 2007, 01:36 UTC · lore

This series is the rest of builtin-fetch. It should probably not be used without a "[PATCH 3.5/4] Support bundles in transport fetch" which Johannes was going to write.

The first patch of this is independant of anything else, but the rest depend on all of the other series I have sent recently. One thing I already plan to fix while doing revisions for comments is that the "remote.<name>.tagopt" config variable parsing is added by the second patch, when it would be more logically added by the first.

When the development cycle is at the right point for getting all this in, I'll be sending out the complete set of patches (aside from the pair that were already accepted). I'm also going to send out another revision of builtin-fetch-pack.c that adds a bit of memory freeing and depends on the first of the accepted pair. And I've got a builtin-send-pack (with a function for transport.c to call directly), although that's not in the critical path.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
Johannes Schindelin· Jul 12, 2007, 01:44 UTC · re: Daniel Barkalow · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/4] The rest of builtin-fetch

Hi,
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> This series is the rest of builtin-fetch. It should probably not be used 
> without a "[PATCH 3.5/4] Support bundles in transport fetch" which 
> Johannes was going to write.
8-)

It is 3am, and I am already in the middle of git hacking, and should go to bed, so that'll have to wait for tomorrow...

Ciao, Dscho

Daniel Barkalow· Jul 12, 2007, 01:49 UTC · re: Johannes Schindelin · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/4] The rest of builtin-fetch

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> 
> > This series is the rest of builtin-fetch. It should probably not be used 
> > without a "[PATCH 3.5/4] Support bundles in transport fetch" which 
> > Johannes was going to write.
> 
> 8-)
> 
> It is 3am, and I am already in the middle of git hacking, and should go to 
> bed, so that'll have to wait for tomorrow...

We're presumably waiting for 1.5.3 before this actually goes anywhere, so there's no big hurry. Just don't want it to get forgotten and have mainline versions where the tests don't pass due to bundles not working (or, worse, an actual release where we forget about them in this context).

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*

← back to recent threads