threads / patch / 8889

patchFixed a formulation mistake in Documentation/user-manual.txt

Subject: [PATCH] Fixed a formulation mistake in Documentation/user-manual.txt

## tl;dr

One message between Jul 6, 2007 and Jul 6, 2007. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 0people: 1as markdown or json

Marcus Fritzsch· Jul 6, 2007, 07:02 UTC · lore

This one fixes a small formulation weirdness in Documentation/user-manual.txt

Signed-off-by: Marcus Fritzsch <m@fritschy.de>
---
 Documentation/user-manual.txt |   14 +++++++-------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Show changes to Documentation/user-manual.txt +7 −7
diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
index ff7c71d..c23077c 100644
--- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt
+++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
@@ -2957,13 +2957,13 @@ developed.  If you blow the directory cache away entirely, you generally
 haven't lost any information as long as you have the name of the tree
 that it described.
 
-At the same time, the index is at the same time also the
-staging area for creating new trees, and creating a new tree always
-involves a controlled modification of the index file.  In particular,
-the index file can have the representation of an intermediate tree that
-has not yet been instantiated.  So the index can be thought of as a
-write-back cache, which can contain dirty information that has not yet
-been written back to the backing store.
+At the same time, the index is also the staging area for creating
+new trees, and creating a new tree always involves a controlled
+modification of the index file.  In particular, the index file can
+have the representation of an intermediate tree that has not yet been
+instantiated.  So the index can be thought of as a write-back cache,
+which can contain dirty information that has not yet been written back
+to the backing store.
 
 
 
-- 
1.5.3.rc0.31.g39f17

← back to recent threads