# Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags 7 messages from 2005-06-02 to 2005-06-03. Participants: Radoslaw Szkodzinski, Dan Holmsand, Petr Baudis. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/815 ## Radoslaw Szkodzinski, 2005-06-02 19:36 Subject: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <429F5FA5.2030306@gorzow.mm.pl> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/429F5FA5.2030306%40gorzow.mm.pl ``` My cg-version is: cogito-0.10 (20e473c9afd8b5d2d549b0e7881473600beb9c37) cg-tag-ls output is: v2.6.11 5dc01c595e6c6ec9ccda4f6f69c131c0dd945f8c v2.6.11-tree 5dc01c595e6c6ec9ccda4f6f69c131c0dd945f8c v2.6.12-rc2 9e734775f7c22d2f89943ad6c745571f1930105f v2.6.12-rc3 0397236d43e48e821cce5bbe6a80a1a56bb7cc3a v2.6.12-rc4 ebb5573ea8beaf000d4833735f3e53acb9af844c v2.6.12-rc5 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d The ID of the commit that says "Linux 2.6.12-rc5" is: 137318b273db26b889675101fbd02d2e84cae5e3 The v2.6.12-rc5 tag hash isn't a tree or commit hash, it is unusable. I don't know what causes that... AstralStorm ``` ## Dan Holmsand, 2005-06-02 19:48 Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <429F6270.50009@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/429F6270.50009%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: <429F5FA5.2030306@gorzow.mm.pl> ``` Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: The v2.6.12-rc5 tag hash isn't a tree or commit hash, it is unusable. > I don't know what causes that... It's a tag object. If you cg-pull via http, you won't get any of those, though. Try rsync instead: $ cg-branch-add kernel rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git $ cg-pull kernel /dan ``` ## Radoslaw Szkodzinski, 2005-06-02 20:01 Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <429F6591.8080005@gorzow.mm.pl> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/429F6591.8080005%40gorzow.mm.pl In-Reply-To: <429F6270.50009@gmail.com> ``` Dan Holmsand wrote: > > Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: > The v2.6.12-rc5 tag hash isn't a tree or commit hash, it is unusable. > >> I don't know what causes that... > > > It's a tag object. If you cg-pull via http, you won't get any of > those, though. > I thought it was one of these. Seems cogito can't handle them yet. > Try rsync instead: > Guess what, I did it by rsync. AstralStorm ``` ## Dan Holmsand, 2005-06-02 20:19 Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <429F69B6.4030806@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/429F69B6.4030806%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: <429F6591.8080005@gorzow.mm.pl> ``` Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: > Dan Holmsand wrote: >>It's a tag object. If you cg-pull via http, you won't get any of >>those, though. > I thought it was one of these. Seems cogito can't handle them yet. Ah. I forgot just how old cogito-0.10 has gotten. Current cogito handles these just fine. You should be able to read the tag object slightly more manually, though: $ git-cat-file tag 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d which tells you that v2.6.12-rc5 is commit 2a24ab628aa7b190be32f63dfb6d96f3fb61580a /dan ``` ## Radoslaw Szkodzinski, 2005-06-02 21:02 Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <429F73E4.1020502@gorzow.mm.pl> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/429F73E4.1020502%40gorzow.mm.pl In-Reply-To: <429F69B6.4030806@gmail.com> ``` Dan Holmsand wrote: > > $ git-cat-file tag 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d > > which tells you that v2.6.12-rc5 is commit > 2a24ab628aa7b190be32f63dfb6d96f3fb61580a > Ok. This doesn't work too. That cogito version really works fine, but I had that branch cloned from a local repository gotten from rsync and probably that's the problem. The tags weren't propagated, but they should be. AstralStorm ``` ## Radoslaw Szkodzinski, 2005-06-02 23:14 Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <429F92CA.9060908@gorzow.mm.pl> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/429F92CA.9060908%40gorzow.mm.pl In-Reply-To: <429F73E4.1020502@gorzow.mm.pl> ``` Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: >Dan Holmsand wrote: > > > >>$ git-cat-file tag 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d >> >>which tells you that v2.6.12-rc5 is commit >>2a24ab628aa7b190be32f63dfb6d96f3fb61580a >> >> >> >Ok. This doesn't work too. That cogito version really works fine, but I >had that branch cloned from a local repository gotten from rsync and >probably that's the problem. >The tags weren't propagated, but they should be. > >AstralStorm > > Well, new cogito-0.11.1 (300ab153620d2492e824cb3561c32debb5e80bf8) has this fixed and picked up missing objects automatically. AstralStorm ``` ## Petr Baudis, 2005-06-03 07:28 Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <20050603072847.GC16619@pasky.ji.cz> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20050603072847.GC16619%40pasky.ji.cz In-Reply-To: <429F92CA.9060908@gorzow.mm.pl> ``` Dear diary, on Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:14:18AM CEST, I got a letter where Radoslaw Szkodzinski told me that... > Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: > > >Dan Holmsand wrote: > > > > > > > >>$ git-cat-file tag 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d > >> > >>which tells you that v2.6.12-rc5 is commit > >>2a24ab628aa7b190be32f63dfb6d96f3fb61580a > >> > >> > >> > >Ok. This doesn't work too. That cogito version really works fine, but I > >had that branch cloned from a local repository gotten from rsync and > >probably that's the problem. > >The tags weren't propagated, but they should be. > > > >AstralStorm > > > > > Well, new cogito-0.11.1 (300ab153620d2492e824cb3561c32debb5e80bf8) has > this fixed and picked up missing objects automatically. Oh yes, I wanted to mention it in this thread but forgot. However note that what it does now is awful and it's just a quick'n'dirty fix to make it mostly work. I guess a better way would be to teach the pull tools to download refs/ files too and do the proper dependency things from them too (in addition to the passed commit id). I will need to go back and look again at the set of Daniel's patches which implemented something like that. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor ```