# [PATCH 0/3] Remotes library, take 4 3 messages from 2007-05-12 to 2007-05-12. Participants: Daniel Barkalow, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/8111 ## Daniel Barkalow, 2007-05-12 15:45 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Remotes library, take 4 Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Pine.LNX.4.64.0705121137400.18541%40iabervon.org ``` Updated for recent review. If remote section name starts with '/', it is ignored (like in 1.5.0). If a remote section option has no value, it is also ignored (so it doesn't crash, and to be forward-compatible if we introduce a boolean option later). The struct refspec field and associated variables are spelled "dst". Part 3 is unchanged. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2007-05-12 19:27 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remotes library, take 4 Message-ID: <7vfy61zvtx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vfy61zvtx.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net In-Reply-To: ``` Daniel Barkalow writes: > Updated for recent review. If remote section name starts with '/', it is > ignored (like in 1.5.0). If a remote section option has no value, it is > also ignored (so it doesn't crash, and to be forward-compatible if we > introduce a boolean option later). > > The struct refspec field and associated variables are spelled "dst". > > Part 3 is unchanged. It cannot be left unchanged as it is affected by the dest stuff. I'll push out a fixed-up one on 'pu' soonish. Let's stabilize this a bit without too many resends. ``` ## Daniel Barkalow, 2007-05-12 19:37 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remotes library, take 4 Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Pine.LNX.4.64.0705121531480.18541%40iabervon.org In-Reply-To: <7vfy61zvtx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> ``` On Sat, 12 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Daniel Barkalow writes: > > > Updated for recent review. If remote section name starts with '/', it is > > ignored (like in 1.5.0). If a remote section option has no value, it is > > also ignored (so it doesn't crash, and to be forward-compatible if we > > introduce a boolean option later). > > > > The struct refspec field and associated variables are spelled "dst". > > > > Part 3 is unchanged. > > It cannot be left unchanged as it is affected by the dest stuff. > > I'll push out a fixed-up one on 'pu' soonish. Let's stabilize > this a bit without too many resends. Yeah, I think we agree on how it should be now, and I'm just confusing myself regenerating patches. Although, possibly, the comment about NULL value should go into documentation for config_fn_t instead, since it's of more general applicability than just this. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* ```