# This seems somewhat less that ideal 5 messages from 2007-04-29 to 2007-05-01. Participants: A Large Angry SCM, Johannes Schindelin, Junio C Hamano. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/7896 ## A Large Angry SCM, 2007-04-29 19:42 Subject: This seems somewhat less that ideal Message-ID: <4634F508.5020702@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4634F508.5020702%40gmail.com ``` The latest pull (fetch) transfered almost the entire history. Yet, I was up-to-date as of last night. remote: Generating pack... remote: Done counting 46473 objects. remote: Deltifying 46473 objects. remote: 100% (46473/46473) done Indexing 46473 objects... remote: Total 46473 (delta 32624), reused 46043 (delta 32299) 100% (46473/46473) done Resolving 32624 deltas... 100% (32624/32624) done * refs/heads/git/git/html: fast forward to branch 'html' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git old..new: 9882a52..469d60e * refs/heads/git/git/maint: fast forward to branch 'maint' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git old..new: 71e2e59..e9d54bd * refs/heads/git/git/man: fast forward to branch 'man' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git old..new: 0d96f48..ab919c8 * refs/heads/git/git/master: fast forward to branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git old..new: 4342572..a07157a * refs/heads/git/git/next: fast forward to branch 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git old..new: 0818190..58684ff * refs/heads/git/git/pu: forcing update to non-fast forward branch 'pu' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git old...new: bb0b180...591bb09 ``` ## Johannes Schindelin, 2007-04-30 19:47 Subject: Re: This seems somewhat less that ideal Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Pine.LNX.4.64.0704302146470.29859%40racer.site In-Reply-To: <4634F508.5020702@gmail.com> ``` Hi, On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, A Large Angry SCM wrote: > The latest pull (fetch) transfered almost the entire history. Yet, I was > up-to-date as of last night. > > > remote: Generating pack... > remote: Done counting 46473 objects. > remote: Deltifying 46473 objects. > remote: 100% (46473/46473) done Hmmm. This hasn't happened in a real long time for me. Do you have an old client? Ciao, Dscho ``` ## A Large Angry SCM, 2007-04-30 22:20 Subject: Re: This seems somewhat less that ideal Message-ID: <46366BA3.3040205@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/46366BA3.3040205%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: ``` Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, A Large Angry SCM wrote: > >> The latest pull (fetch) transfered almost the entire history. Yet, I was >> up-to-date as of last night. >> >> >> remote: Generating pack... >> remote: Done counting 46473 objects. >> remote: Deltifying 46473 objects. >> remote: 100% (46473/46473) done > > Hmmm. This hasn't happened in a real long time for me. Do you have an old > client? It was built from the previous master, 4342572. Very odd. ``` ## Junio C Hamano, 2007-05-01 04:29 Subject: Re: This seems somewhat less that ideal Message-ID: <7vmz0p88u0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vmz0p88u0.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net In-Reply-To: <4634F508.5020702@gmail.com> ``` A Large Angry SCM writes: > remote: Generating pack... > remote: Done counting 46473 objects. > remote: Deltifying 46473 objects. > remote: 100% (46473/46473) done > Indexing 46473 objects... > remote: Total 46473 (delta 32624), reused 46043 (delta 32299) > 100% (46473/46473) done > Resolving 32624 deltas... > 100% (32624/32624) done Indeed it seems somewhat less than ideal. Funny thing is that it does not reproduce. ``` ## A Large Angry SCM, 2007-05-01 22:32 Subject: Re: This seems somewhat less that ideal Message-ID: <4637BFF3.2000804@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4637BFF3.2000804%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: <7vmz0p88u0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> ``` Junio C Hamano wrote: > A Large Angry SCM writes: > >> remote: Generating pack... >> remote: Done counting 46473 objects. >> remote: Deltifying 46473 objects. >> remote: 100% (46473/46473) done >> Indexing 46473 objects... >> remote: Total 46473 (delta 32624), reused 46043 (delta 32299) >> 100% (46473/46473) done >> Resolving 32624 deltas... >> 100% (32624/32624) done > > Indeed it seems somewhat less than ideal. Funny thing is that > it does not reproduce. Not hear either, but I'm not able to recreate the precise conditions again. ```