threads / patch / 7821

patch, 5 parts[PATCH 0/5]

Subject: [PATCH 0/5]

## tl;dr

6 messages between Apr 24, 2007 and Apr 25, 2007. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 5people: 2as markdown or json

Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino· Apr 24, 2007, 18:01 UTC · lore
 Hi,
 Some random things I've fixed while reading the code, they're
unrelated changes, but I think it's better to send in one shot.
Diff stat:
 Documentation/core-tutorial.txt |    9 ++++-----
 builtin-commit-tree.c           |    3 +--
 cache.h                         |    2 +-
 entry.c                         |   14 +++++++-------
 read-cache.c                    |   16 ++++++++--------
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino· Apr 24, 2007, 20:52 UTC · re: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/5]

Em Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:01:10 -0300 "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> escreveu:

|  Hi,
| 
|  Some random things I've fixed while reading the code, they're
| unrelated changes, but I think it's better to send in one shot.
 Sorry for that, looks like git-send-email doesn't want to work
for me.
 Will send again shortly.
-- 
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino· Apr 25, 2007, 14:04 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/5]

Em Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:56:11 -0700 Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> escreveu:

| I suspect that you need to quote your human readable name, as it
| has a full-stop in it ("N.").  Maybe git-send-email should be
| taught about it.
 It worked when I tested it sending the series to me and CC'ing
my gmail address.
 Will send this series by hand and figure out a better way to
do this...
-- 
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
Hermes Trismegisto· Apr 25, 2007, 19:04 UTC · re: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/5]

"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines
> Em Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:56:11 -0700
> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> escreveu:
>
> | I suspect that you need to quote your human readable name, as it
> | has a full-stop in it ("N.").  Maybe git-send-email should be
> | taught about it.
>
>  It worked when I tested it sending the series to me and CC'ing
> my gmail address.

Hmmm. Maybe vger and my ISP have stricter filter based on set of addresses that appear on To/Cc lines than the way you receive mails?

In git-send-email, I notice that $author_name address on From: line is quoted in dq pairs (in sub send_message) but none of the addresses in @cc taken from the Signed-off-by lines are not inspected nor quoted. I do not know what is being done to To: recipients offhand and I am too lazy to check.

>  Will send this series by hand and figure out a better way to
> do this...
Thanks.  They look reasonable, at least from my cursory look.
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino· Apr 25, 2007, 19:36 UTC · re: Hermes Trismegisto · lore

Re: [PATCH 0/5]

Em Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:04:32 -0700 Hermes Trismegisto <junkio@cox.net> escreveu:

| "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
| writes:
| 
| > Em Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:56:11 -0700
| > Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> escreveu:
| >
| > | I suspect that you need to quote your human readable name, as it
| > | has a full-stop in it ("N.").  Maybe git-send-email should be
| > | taught about it.
| >
| >  It worked when I tested it sending the series to me and CC'ing
| > my gmail address.
| 
| Hmmm.  Maybe vger and my ISP have stricter filter based on set
| of addresses that appear on To/Cc lines than the way you receive
| mails?
 Maybe, but I've alreays used quilt send to submit patches and it
works quite well (not sure whether I've submitted more than five
patches to LKML though).
| In git-send-email, I notice that $author_name address on From:
| line is quoted in dq pairs (in sub send_message) but none of the
| addresses in @cc taken from the Signed-off-by lines are not
| inspected nor quoted.  I do not know what is being done to To:
| recipients offhand and I am too lazy to check.
 Heh, I can't check either.
| >  Will send this series by hand and figure out a better way to
| > do this...
| 
| Thanks.  They look reasonable, at least from my cursory look.
 You're welcome.
-- 
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino

← back to recent threads