So we can remove the specific message in "bisect_run".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
---
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Doesn't that suggest the existing messages from "git bisect good/bad"
> can use the same improvement you added only to "bisect run"?
You mean something like this patch ?
git-bisect.sh | 13 ++++++-------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Show changes to git-bisect.sh +6 −7
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index 57d6754..47f0b8b 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -123,7 +123,12 @@ bisect_next_check() {
case "$next_ok,$1" in
no,) false ;;
no,fail)
- echo >&2 'You need to give me at least one good and one bad revisions.'
+ USE_START=''
+ test -d "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect" ||
+ USE_START='start by "git bisect start" and then'
+ echo >&2 'You need to' $USE_START\
+ 'give me at least one good and one bad revisions' \
+ 'by "git bisect good" and "git bisect bad".'
exit 1 ;;
*)
true ;;
@@ -223,12 +228,6 @@ bisect_replay () {
}
bisect_run () {
- # Check that we have everything to run correctly.
- test -d "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect" || {
- echo >&2 'You need to start by "git bisect start".'
- echo >&2 'And then by "git bisect bad" and "git bisect good".'
- exit 1
- }
bisect_next_check fail
while true
--
1.5.1.rc2.15.g465b3-dirty