threads / discuss / 7333

Suspicious of v1.5.0 tag object

Subject: Suspicious of v1.5.0 tag object

## tl;dr

4 messages between Mar 20, 2007 and Mar 20, 2007.

replies: 3people: 3as markdown or json

Andy Parkins· Mar 20, 2007, 13:23 UTC · lore
Hello,
I was just poking around and noticed this:
  $ git cat-file -p v1.5.0
  object 437b1b20df4b356c9342dac8d38849f24ef44f27
  type commit
  tag v1.5.0
  tagger Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Wed Feb 14 00:00:00 2007 +0000

Is it really the case that you tagged v1.5.0 at midnight UTC exactly; and that you travelled from your normal -0800 timezone to +0000? None of the other tags show this strange output.

  $ git cat-file -p v1.5.0.2
  object 0d9b9ab1284ce125fd49cf7dbf4d28e0540cf035
  type commit
  tag v1.5.0.2
  tagger Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Mon Feb 26 00:26:21 2007 -0800
This looks much more normal.

Is the v1.5.0 tag object showing a bug? (The other possibility being that you did some clever messing to make it appear at exactly that moment)

Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
Junio C Hamano· Mar 20, 2007, 20:43 UTC · re: Andy Parkins · lore

Re: Suspicious of v1.5.0 tag object

Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> I was just poking around and noticed this:
>
>   $ git cat-file -p v1.5.0
>   object 437b1b20df4b356c9342dac8d38849f24ef44f27
>   type commit
>   tag v1.5.0
>   tagger Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Wed Feb 14 00:00:00 2007 +0000
>
> Is it really the case that you tagged v1.5.0 at midnight UTC
> exactly; and that you travelled from your normal -0800
> timezone to +0000?  None of the other tags show this strange
> output.

Who are you referring to as "you" when your "To:" header reads Git Mailing List ;-)?

That one and its commit object has that timestamp because the release was supposed to be named "Rose scented bamboo".

Andy Parkins· Mar 20, 2007, 21:38 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: Suspicious of v1.5.0 tag object

On Tuesday 2007, March 20, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> >   tagger Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Wed Feb 14 00:00:00 2007
> > +0000
> >
> > Is it really the case that you tagged v1.5.0 at midnight UTC
>
> Who are you referring to as "you" when your "To:" header reads
> Git Mailing List ;-)?
Ah but the "tagger" reads Junio :-)
> That one and its commit object has that timestamp because the
> release was supposed to be named "Rose scented bamboo".
Fair enough.  Just thought I'd raise it in case it was a bug.
Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
Johannes Schindelin· Mar 20, 2007, 22:10 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: Suspicious of v1.5.0 tag object

Hi,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> That one and its commit object has that timestamp because the release 
> was supposed to be named "Rose scented bamboo".

You cannot name it like that. Unless I am mistaken, "Rose scented bamboo" is no British slang word.

Ciao, Dscho

← back to recent threads