# git-send-email

2 messages from 2007-02-22 to 2007-02-22. Participants: Uwe Kleine-König, Junio C Hamano.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/6917

## Uwe Kleine-König, 2007-02-22 21:13

Subject: git-send-email
Message-ID: <20070222211313.GA23674@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20070222211313.GA23674%40informatik.uni-freiburg.de

```
Hello,

again my 'ö' is an issue here, sorry Jöhännës :-)

I just tried to send out some patches with git-send-email specifying
--suppress-from.

send-email added me to Cc: anyhow.  Here come the last line of output:

	(mbox) Adding cc: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> from line 'From: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>'
	OK. Log says:
	Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:42:49 +0100
	Sendmail: /home/zeisberg/bin/usendmail
	From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
	Subject: [PATCH] Determine system clock from PLL settings
	Cc: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
	To: cft.project.parkeon@digi.com

Probably send-email thought =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= being
different from Uwe Kleine-König?  I didn't got a Cc of the introductory
message.

Moreover for each patch the following line was added:

	From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> - unquoted

which should not be necessary, too.

BTW: Maybe this is related to the problem Russell King has with Perl and
rfc2047:

	http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/30178/

?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Uwe Kleine-König

exit vi, lesson II:
: w q ! <CR>

NB: write the current file

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2007-02-22 21:38

Subject: Re: git-send-email
Message-ID: <7vd541dgae.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7vd541dgae.fsf%40assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net
In-Reply-To: <20070222211313.GA23674@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>

```
When git-send-email reads from the mbox, it should expect From:
to be in 2047 (because the input is in Unix mbox format) and
unwrap it before doing the comparison.  Perhaps it is not doing
that.

```