threads / discuss / 6591

When to repack?

Subject: When to repack?

## tl;dr

5 messages between Jan 31, 2007 and Jan 31, 2007.

replies: 4people: 5as markdown or json

Bill Lear· Jan 31, 2007, 12:50 UTC · lore

We have a company repo used by many people throughout the day. When/how can I repack this? I have come to adopt this approach:

% mv project project.pack % cd project.pack % GIT_DIR=. git repack -a -d % cd .. % mv project.pack project

Bill
Jakub Narebski· Jan 31, 2007, 12:58 UTC · re: Bill Lear · lore

Re: When to repack?

[Cc: git@vger.kernel.org]
Bill Lear wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> We have a company repo used by many people throughout the day.  When/how
> can I repack this?  I have come to adopt this approach:
> 
> % mv project project.pack
> % cd project.pack
> % GIT_DIR=. git repack -a -d
> % cd ..
> % mv project.pack project

Repack is safe. You can do it on live repository. It does the save under temporary name and move to proper place on it's own.

By the way you can use "git --bare repack -a -d" instead of "GIT_DIR=. git repack -a -d"

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Andreas Ericsson· Jan 31, 2007, 13:01 UTC · re: Bill Lear · lore

Re: When to repack?

Bill Lear wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> We have a company repo used by many people throughout the day.  When/how
> can I repack this?  I have come to adopt this approach:
> 
> % mv project project.pack
> % cd project.pack
> % GIT_DIR=. git repack -a -d
> % cd ..
> % mv project.pack project
> 

Renaming the directory isn't necessary. The packs won't be used until they have a .idx file. That .idx-file is written after the packfile, so any operations on the repo will simply use the old, loose, objects before the packing is completed.

The worst thing that can happen is that an object about to be fetched is deleted in its loose version before the upload-pack program can open it, but that's no worse than having the entire directory being moved out from under it.

On a side-note, this is a grade A example of something that should typically be done sunday night at 4am.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
Johannes Schindelin· Jan 31, 2007, 15:19 UTC · re: Andreas Ericsson · lore

Re: When to repack?

Hi,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> Bill Lear wrote:
> > We have a company repo used by many people throughout the day.  When/how
> > can I repack this?  I have come to adopt this approach:
> > 
> > % mv project project.pack
> > % cd project.pack
> > % GIT_DIR=. git repack -a -d
> > % cd ..
> > % mv project.pack project
> > 
> 
> Renaming the directory isn't necessary. The packs won't be used until they
> have a .idx file. That .idx-file is written after the packfile, so any
> operations on the repo will simply use the old, loose, objects before the
> packing is completed.
> 
> The worst thing that can happen is that an object about to be fetched is
> deleted in its loose version before the upload-pack program can open it,
> but that's no worse than having the entire directory being moved out from
> under it.

AFAIR this case is handled gracefully by git. If the object it is still accessing moves to a(nother) pack, git will still find it.

> On a side-note, this is a grade A example of something that should 
> typically be done sunday night at 4am.

Actually, I'd recommend git-gc. It does not even call git-prune anymore, so there is no excuse.

I even do it interactively very often, and I just love the fact that "gc" is so much shorter than "repack -a -d", _plus_ it also does other cleanup tasks.

Ciao, Dscho

Shawn O. Pearce· Jan 31, 2007, 15:36 UTC · re: Johannes Schindelin · lore

Re: When to repack?

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> > Bill Lear wrote:
> > > We have a company repo used by many people throughout the day.  When/how
> > > can I repack this?  I have come to adopt this approach:
> 
> AFAIR this case is handled gracefully by git. If the object it is still 
> accessing moves to a(nother) pack, git will still find it.

No AFAIR, its definately true. `git gc` is completely safe on a live repository. Run it at will. Toss it in a cronjob. Whatever.

What is *not* safe is `git gc --prune`.  Don't run that on an
active repository.
 
> > On a side-note, this is a grade A example of something that should 
> > typically be done sunday night at 4am.

Possibly. Almost doesn't matter when you run it, except on very huge repositories where the repack would take more than a few minutes.

Really, just toss something like the following in a cronjob that runs once a week:

	#!/bin/sh
	for g in /path/to/gits/*.git
	do
	  git --git-dir="$g" gc
	done
If you want to get fancy, use the output of `git count-objects -v`:
	count: 325
	size: 2332
	in-pack: 40894
	packs: 1
	prune-packable: 0
	garbage: 0

I look for a count over 2000 or packs over 5. If either is true, I run gc, otherwise I skip that repository and leave it alone that week. And that's actually packing more frequently than I really need to. On any UNIX system you can probably let those go to >5,000 or 20 and still not really see a performance problem.

In general, repacks and network transfers (or basically any operation) takes longer as the number of loose objects increases (that's the count field in `git count-objects -v`). Keep below ~2000 and `git gc` times tend to be measured in just a minute or two for even 200 MiB repositories.

-- 
Shawn.

← back to recent threads