# [GSoC] Discussion: git repo structure enhancements

2 messages from 2026-03-06 to 2026-03-10. Participants: Mansi Singh, Kaartic Sivaraam.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/65148

## Mansi Singh, 2026-03-06 05:10

Subject: [GSoC] Discussion: git repo structure enhancements
Message-ID: <CAO_P5U2f4MD-URre+4ocC=YQ570hr03pZHDk1jvuSOKx4aLOCA@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAO_P5U2f4MD-URre%2B4ocC%3DYQ570hr03pZHDk1jvuSOKx4aLOCA%40mail.gmail.com

```
Hi,

I am planning to apply for GSoC 2026 for the "Improve the new git repo
command" project, focusing specifically on extending git repo
structure with metrics from git-sizer. The ideas page mentions this as
a potential improvement.
Before drafting a full proposal, I wanted to confirm:
1. Is this direction still desired, or is it already being worked on
by someone?
2. Which git-sizer metrics does the community consider most valuable
to add first?
3. Should new structure tests go in t1900-repo-info.sh or a separate
t1901-repo-structure.sh?

My contributions so far:
- t7605 microproject: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2050
- Variable shadow fix in repo.c: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2062
- Structure tests: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2064

Thanks,
Mansi Singh

```

## Kaartic Sivaraam, 2026-03-10 19:58

Subject: Re: [GSoC] Discussion: git repo structure enhancements
Message-ID: <b65284f5-f1b7-4af3-a126-f373bf93da7c@gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/b65284f5-f1b7-4af3-a126-f373bf93da7c%40gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAO_P5U2f4MD-URre+4ocC=YQ570hr03pZHDk1jvuSOKx4aLOCA@mail.gmail.com>

```
Hi Mansi,

Thank you for your interest in contributing to Git!

On 06/03/26 10:40, Mansi Singh wrote:
>
> I am planning to apply for GSoC 2026 for the "Improve the new git repo
> command" project, focusing specifically on extending git repo
> structure with metrics from git-sizer. The ideas page mentions this as
> a potential improvement.
> Before drafting a full proposal, I wanted to confirm:
> 1. Is this direction still desired, or is it already being worked on
> by someone?

We have a couple of proposal related to it. There is also some
discussion on the scope of the project. If you're yet to start working 
on a proposal and have other things that interest you, kindly pick them 
for the time being. We'll post shortly about the "repo info" idea.

--
Sivaraam


```
