# Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: fix From header in cover letter

1 messages from 2026-02-17 to 2026-02-17. Participants: Mirko Faina.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/65007

## Mirko Faina, 2026-02-17 21:30

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: fix From header in cover letter
Message-ID: <aZTcsow2QtBpRiJd@exploit>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/aZTcsow2QtBpRiJd%40exploit

```
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 07:22:08AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> One thing that made me stop though is the folowing sentence in
> git-format-patch(1):
> 
>   Use ident in the From: header of each commit email.
> 
> The option explicitly mentions that we use "--from" for the commit
> emails, only, and that may be read as implying that it's not used for
> the cover letter.
> 
> I don't really know whether that wording is intentional, and I cannot
> come up with a good reason why it should be. But I'd say that the
> wording is something we should adjust.

I don't think any user would reasonably think that it wouldn't apply to
the cover letter as you're sending the whole patch series in bulk, as the
same person.

I will change the documentation to remove any ambiguity.

> We're not only testing the cover letter here though, but also the other
> generated patch. This makes it somewhat hard to verify that the test
> actually works as expected. Would it make sense to maybe use something
> like the following instead?
> 
>   test_expect_success '--from applies to cover letter' '
>   	test_when_finished "rm -rf patches" &&
>   	git format-patch -1 --cover-letter --from="Foo Bar <author@example.com>" -o patches &&
>   	echo "From: Foo Bar <author@example.com>" >expect &&
>   	grep "^From:" patches/0000-cover-letter.patch >patch.head &&
>   	test_cmp expect patch.head
>   '

Yes, makes sense, wouldn't want to generate a false negative on the
compliance of the "--from" option.
I will apply the suggested change.

Thank you

```
