This cycle brings a t9700 test failure on cygwin, see patch #1. The second patch was owed from the last cycle, sorry about not getting to it sooner, but it is _still_ a puzzle. ;)
I have tested these patches on Linux without issue. On cygwin the t0610 test passes with '--stress' which it failed earlier and the t9700 test has only been tested by hand.
Directly after sending these patches, I will start a '-j8' run of the full testsuite on cygwin and let you know if it fails (it should not!). ;)
[When I run the testsuite like this on cygwin I can't use the laptop for anything else and the keyboard gets _very_ toasty!]
Thanks
Ramsay Jones
Ramsay Jones (2): t9700/test.pl: fix path type expectation on cygwin t0610-reftable-basics: mitigate a flaky test on cygwin
t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh | 2 +- t/t9700/test.pl | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-- 2.52.0