threads / patch / 64142

patchgitk: fix error when remote tracking branch is deleted

Subject: [PATCH] gitk: fix error when remote tracking branch is deleted

## tl;dr

2 messages between Sep 13, 2025 and Sep 14, 2025. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Michael Rappazzo· Sep 13, 2025, 11:31 UTC · lore

When a remote tracking branch is deleted (e.g., via 'git push --delete origin branch'), the headids array entry for that branch is removed, but upstreamofref may still reference it. This causes gitk to show an error and prevents the Tags and Heads view from opening.

Fix by checking that headids($upstreamofref($n)) exists before accessing it in the refill_reflist function.

Signed-off-by: Michael Rappazzo <rappazzo@gmail.com>
---
To reproduce the case:
```
mkdir sample-repo-remote &&
cd sample-repo-remote &&
git init --bare --initial-branch master && 
cd .. &&
git clone sample-repo-remote sample-repo &&
cd sample-repo &&
git commit --allow-empty -m "Sample commit" &&
git push origin master &&
git push origin master:master2 &&
git branch master2 origin/master2 &&
git push --delete origin master2
```
Then run gitk --all then bring up the "Tags and Heads" view.
 gitk | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Show changes to gitk +3 −1
diff --git a/gitk b/gitk
index 6e4d71d585..3cfc9ef291 100755
--- a/gitk
+++ b/gitk
@@ -10294,7 +10294,9 @@ proc refill_reflist {} {
         if {![string match "remotes/*" $n] && [string match $reflistfilter $n]} {
             if {[commitinview $headids($n) $curview]} {
                 lappend localrefs [list $n H]
-                if {[info exists upstreamofref($n)] && [commitinview $headids($upstreamofref($n)) $curview]} {
+                if {[info exists upstreamofref($n)] && \
+                        [info exists headids($upstreamofref($n))] && \
+                        [commitinview $headids($upstreamofref($n)) $curview]} {
                     lappend trackedremoterefs [list $upstreamofref($n) R]
                 }
             } else {
-- 
2.51.0
Johannes Sixt· Sep 14, 2025, 18:32 UTC · re: Michael Rappazzo · lore

Re: [PATCH] gitk: fix error when remote tracking branch is deleted

Am 13.09.25 um 13:31 schrieb Michael Rappazzo:
Show 9 quoted lines
> When a remote tracking branch is deleted (e.g., via 'git push --delete
> origin branch'), the headids array entry for that branch is removed, but
> upstreamofref may still reference it. This causes gitk to show an error
> and prevents the Tags and Heads view from opening.
> 
> Fix by checking that headids($upstreamofref($n)) exists before accessing
> it in the refill_reflist function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Rappazzo <rappazzo@gmail.com>
Thank you, this looks reasonable. Queued.
Show 36 quoted lines
> ---
> To reproduce the case:
> ```
> mkdir sample-repo-remote &&
> cd sample-repo-remote &&
> git init --bare --initial-branch master && 
> cd .. &&
> git clone sample-repo-remote sample-repo &&
> cd sample-repo &&
> git commit --allow-empty -m "Sample commit" &&
> git push origin master &&
> git push origin master:master2 &&
> git branch master2 origin/master2 &&
> git push --delete origin master2
> ```
> Then run gitk --all then bring up the "Tags and Heads" view.
> 
> 
>  gitk | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gitk b/gitk
> index 6e4d71d585..3cfc9ef291 100755
> --- a/gitk
> +++ b/gitk
> @@ -10294,7 +10294,9 @@ proc refill_reflist {} {
>          if {![string match "remotes/*" $n] && [string match $reflistfilter $n]} {
>              if {[commitinview $headids($n) $curview]} {
>                  lappend localrefs [list $n H]
> -                if {[info exists upstreamofref($n)] && [commitinview $headids($upstreamofref($n)) $curview]} {
> +                if {[info exists upstreamofref($n)] && \
> +                        [info exists headids($upstreamofref($n))] && \
> +                        [commitinview $headids($upstreamofref($n)) $curview]} {
>                      lappend trackedremoterefs [list $upstreamofref($n) R]
>                  }
>              } else {

← back to recent threads