# [GSoC PROPOSAL v1] Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state 5 messages from 2025-04-02 to 2025-04-05. Participants: Arnav Bhate, Patrick Steinhardt. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/63243 ## Arnav Bhate, 2025-04-02 18:14 Subject: [GSoC PROPOSAL v1] Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state Message-ID: <1077615a-1c31-416d-a754-58b36d404289@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1077615a-1c31-416d-a754-58b36d404289%40gmail.com ``` ## Personal Information - Full name: Arnav Akshaya Bhate - Email address: bhatearnav@gmail.com - Mobile no.: +91 8291328838 - Time zone: UTC+05:30 - Education: IIT Bombay - Year: Second year - GitHub: https://github.com/arnavbhate ## About Me I'm Arnav Bhate, a second-year UG student at Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. I love coding and so I am a member of IIT Bombay's Developers' Community (DevCom), which is a group of roughly 40 people developing software for use by students and staff of the institute. Most of the software developed is not open source, so I can not include examples of my work there in this proposal. Being a member of DevCom has exposed me to collaborative software development. A common link in all software I have worked on is that Git has been used for version control. I thus see this project as my way of giving back to the Git community in particular and open source in general. This will be my first significant contribution to the open source community, and I wish to stick around afterwards. ## Overview Git currently uses many global variables, most significantly `the_repository`, which are included in roughly 290 files. Apart from `the_repository`, there are many global variables, some of which logically belong in struct repository, as they represent information specific to a repository. So even if all instances of the_repository were converted into a extra repository argument for the function, there would still be many global variables left. The use of such variables assumes that Git will only operate on one repository at a time, which renders multi-repository handling impossible without kludges. This project aims to move such variables from global scope into more appropriate local contexts, mainly `struct repository` and `struct repository_settings`. This will not only make the environment repository-specific, allowing easy multi-repository handling, but also make maintaining the code easier. The project involves identifying suitable locations for environment variables in repository specific structs, moving them there and updating all the code affected by the move. ## Pre-GSoC I first got into Git's codebase in February 2025, with my first contribution in March. My first patch was on my microproject and since then I have submitted two more patches on a similar topic. ### Patches - (Microproject) decorate: fix sign comparison warnings Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/afa6b428-3190-42ae-9eac-540c95b576fd@gmail.com/ Status: Merged into master Commit hash: 2bfd3b368572cbf1ce287de09db08b7e7e429ecd Description: Refactoring of decorate.c to replace signed variables with unsigned ones when they are used to iterate over arrays whose sizes are represented by unsigned variables, and remove 2 unnecessary variables which just hold the value of another variable without being modified, replacing them with the variable whose value they were holding. - rm: fix sign comparison warnings Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/38de63ce-6d4e-4f1f-95b1-049df78d9cfc@gmail.com/ Status: Under discussion Description: Refactoring of rm.c to make iterators over arrays whose sizes are represented by unsigned variables unsigned. Specifically in `get_ours_cache_pos`, where before a signed variable was being passed and then inverted in the function, now the already inverted variable is passed as an unsigned variable, with the inversion moved to the function call. - pathspec: fix sign comparison warnings Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/a3aa5f99-63ce-4be5-8d64-fb6e226b3bf9@gmail.com/ Status: under discussion Description: Refactoring of pathspec.c to make array iterator variables match the type of the variable storing the array's size. Where replacing the variable's type is not possible, because of the large-scale cascade replacements it would cause, an appropriate cast has been added. ## Proposed Plan - Identifying all occurences of `the_repository` and updating them to use a `struct repository` passed to the function. - Identifying global variables that should be moved and identifying suitable locations, some could be moved directly into `struct repository`, some in its sub-structs that already exist and some in newly created sub-structs. - Identifying and updating occurences of these variables to reference their new locations. It makes sense that all the variables need not be in the same struct, as separation would keep the codebase organised, and thus easier to maintain. It would also make it easier to introduce these changes systematically, as a group of related variables, combined together in a struct, could be introduced in a single patch series. ### Timeline #### Pre-GSoC (Until May 8) - Explore the codebase, identifying global variables and how they are used. - Start to identify suitable locations for global variables. #### Community Bonding Period (May 8 - June 1) - Interact with mentor, discussing best ways to refactor various variables and make a plan based on that. - If time is left, start coding early, as my summer break will have started. #### Coding Period (June 2 - August 25) - Modify functions to add an `struct repository` argument where they depend on `the_repository` and replace all occurences of it. - Move global variables to their new locations in various structs, and refactor functions that depend on them to use their new locations. #### Final Week (August 25 - September 1) - Fix any bugs that may be left. - Write final report. ### Availability My summer break from college lasts from May to July. I am currently planning on taking a vacation during this period of about 1 week, however, the dates have not been decided. Outside of this vacation, I am not occupied in the break and can devote up to 60 hours a week towards the project. In August, once classes recommence, I will be available for 20 hours a week. ## Post-GSoC After completing my project, I plan on staying active and contributing patches, and start reviewing code. -- Regards, Arnav Bhate (He/Him) ``` ## Patrick Steinhardt, 2025-04-03 09:59 Subject: Re: [GSoC PROPOSAL v1] Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Z-5b6INZXiXbEuU2%40pks.im In-Reply-To: <1077615a-1c31-416d-a754-58b36d404289@gmail.com> ``` On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:44:12PM +0530, Arnav Bhate wrote: [snip] > ## Proposed Plan > > - Identifying all occurences of `the_repository` and updating them to > use a `struct repository` passed to the function. I think that might be overly ambituous :) After all we're talking about ~3500 occurrences, and it won't be feasible to replace them all in the couple of months. This is rather a multi-year project, and one that has already been going on for quite a while. > - Identifying global variables that should be moved and identifying > suitable locations, some could be moved directly into > `struct repository`, some in its sub-structs that already exist and > some in newly created sub-structs. Likewise, I would recommend to properly scope _which_ variables you want to replace. There's a ton of global state, so you should try to limit the project to a reasonable workload. > - Identifying and updating occurences of these variables to reference > their new locations. > > It makes sense that all the variables need not be in the same struct, as > separation would keep the codebase organised, and thus easier to > maintain. It would also make it easier to introduce these changes > systematically, as a group of related variables, combined together in a > struct, could be introduced in a single patch series. > > ### Timeline > > #### Pre-GSoC (Until May 8) > > - Explore the codebase, identifying global variables and how they are > used. > > - Start to identify suitable locations for global variables. > > #### Community Bonding Period (May 8 - June 1) > > - Interact with mentor, discussing best ways to refactor various > variables and make a plan based on that. > > - If time is left, start coding early, as my summer break will have > started. > > #### Coding Period (June 2 - August 25) > > - Modify functions to add an `struct repository` argument where they > depend on `the_repository` and replace all occurences of it. > > - Move global variables to their new locations in various structs, > and refactor functions that depend on them to use their new locations. In large-scale projects like these it typically makes sense to work in batches. Instead of having three separate phases to "define the problem", "develop the solution" and "deploy the improvement" I would strongly encourage you to define and tie together smaller batches of work. Thanks! Patrick ``` ## Arnav Bhate, 2025-04-03 15:26 Subject: Re: [GSoC PROPOSAL v1] Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/bcdeb3cf-33a1-4553-897d-0bc09dc6a78d%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: ``` Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:44:12PM +0530, Arnav Bhate wrote: > [snip] >> ## Proposed Plan >> >> - Identifying all occurences of `the_repository` and updating them to >> use a `struct repository` passed to the function. > > I think that might be overly ambituous :) After all we're talking about > ~3500 occurrences, and it won't be feasible to replace them all in the > couple of months. This is rather a multi-year project, and one that has > already been going on for quite a while. > >> - Identifying global variables that should be moved and identifying >> suitable locations, some could be moved directly into >> `struct repository`, some in its sub-structs that already exist and >> some in newly created sub-structs. > > Likewise, I would recommend to properly scope _which_ variables you want > to replace. There's a ton of global state, so you should try to limit > the project to a reasonable workload. I could do all the global variables in environment.c. I feel like that is doable. Once I am finished with that, I could start replacing the_repository. >> - Identifying and updating occurences of these variables to reference >> their new locations. >> >> It makes sense that all the variables need not be in the same struct, as >> separation would keep the codebase organised, and thus easier to >> maintain. It would also make it easier to introduce these changes >> systematically, as a group of related variables, combined together in a >> struct, could be introduced in a single patch series. >> >> ### Timeline >> >> #### Pre-GSoC (Until May 8) >> >> - Explore the codebase, identifying global variables and how they are >> used. >> >> - Start to identify suitable locations for global variables. >> >> #### Community Bonding Period (May 8 - June 1) >> >> - Interact with mentor, discussing best ways to refactor various >> variables and make a plan based on that. >> >> - If time is left, start coding early, as my summer break will have >> started. >> >> #### Coding Period (June 2 - August 25) >> >> - Modify functions to add an `struct repository` argument where they >> depend on `the_repository` and replace all occurences of it. >> >> - Move global variables to their new locations in various structs, >> and refactor functions that depend on them to use their new locations. > > In large-scale projects like these it typically makes sense to work in > batches. Instead of having three separate phases to "define the > problem", "develop the solution" and "deploy the improvement" I would > strongly encourage you to define and tie together smaller batches of > work. What I meant is, before coding started, I want to finalise all the new locations for the global variables with my mentor, then I would actually modify the code in batches, struct-by-struct. Are you suggesting that the new locations not be finalised beforehand, or are we misinterpreting each other? > Thanks! > > Patrick -- Regards, Arnav Bhate (He/Him) ``` ## Patrick Steinhardt, 2025-04-04 09:19 Subject: Re: [GSoC PROPOSAL v1] Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Z--kCrCnl3Zw4YG7%40pks.im In-Reply-To: ``` On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 08:56:45PM +0530, Arnav Bhate wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt writes: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:44:12PM +0530, Arnav Bhate wrote: > >> ### Timeline > >> > >> #### Pre-GSoC (Until May 8) > >> > >> - Explore the codebase, identifying global variables and how they are > >> used. > >> > >> - Start to identify suitable locations for global variables. > >> > >> #### Community Bonding Period (May 8 - June 1) > >> > >> - Interact with mentor, discussing best ways to refactor various > >> variables and make a plan based on that. > >> > >> - If time is left, start coding early, as my summer break will have > >> started. > >> > >> #### Coding Period (June 2 - August 25) > >> > >> - Modify functions to add an `struct repository` argument where they > >> depend on `the_repository` and replace all occurences of it. > >> > >> - Move global variables to their new locations in various structs, > >> and refactor functions that depend on them to use their new locations. > > > > In large-scale projects like these it typically makes sense to work in > > batches. Instead of having three separate phases to "define the > > problem", "develop the solution" and "deploy the improvement" I would > > strongly encourage you to define and tie together smaller batches of > > work. > > What I meant is, before coding started, I want to finalise all the new > locations for the global variables with my mentor, then I would actually > modify the code in batches, struct-by-struct. Are you suggesting that > the new locations not be finalised beforehand, or are we misinterpreting > each other? The problem I see is that you only have one large "Coding Period". What we would like to see though is that you define smaller, self-contained batches of work that you can try to land individually, as well as an estimation around how long each of these batches will take you to both developend and land in Git itself. Patrick ``` ## Arnav Bhate, 2025-04-05 18:41 Subject: [GSoC PROPOSAL v2] Refactoring in order to reduce Git’s global state Message-ID: <7116fc77-2280-4bd1-b2f2-131e1108b8ce@gmail.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/7116fc77-2280-4bd1-b2f2-131e1108b8ce%40gmail.com In-Reply-To: <1077615a-1c31-416d-a754-58b36d404289@gmail.com> ``` ## Personal Information - Full name: Arnav Akshaya Bhate - Email address: bhatearnav@gmail.com - Mobile no.: +91 8291328838 - Time zone: UTC+05:30 - Education: IIT Bombay - Year: Second year - GitHub: https://github.com/arnavbhate ## About Me I'm Arnav Bhate, a second-year UG student at Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. I love coding and so I am a member of IIT Bombay's Developers' Community (DevCom), which is a group of roughly 40 people developing software for use by students and staff of the institute. Most of the software developed is not open source, so I can not include examples of my work there in this proposal. Being a member of DevCom has exposed me to collaborative software development. A common link in all software I have worked on is that Git has been used for version control. I thus see this project as my way of giving back to the Git community in particular and open source in general. This will be my first significant contribution to the open source community, and I wish to stick around afterwards. ## Overview Git currently uses many global variables, most significantly `the_repository`, which are included in roughly 290 files. Apart from `the_repository`, there are many global variables, some of which logically belong in struct repository, as they represent information specific to a repository. So even if all instances of the_repository were converted into a extra repository argument for the function, there would still be many global variables left. The use of such variables assumes that Git will only operate on one repository at a time, which renders multi-repository handling impossible without kludges. This project aims to move such variables from global scope into more appropriate local contexts, mainly `struct repository` and `struct repository_settings`. This will not only make the environment repository-specific, allowing easy multi-repository handling, but also make maintaining the code easier. The project involves identifying suitable locations for environment variables in repository specific structs, moving them there and updating all the code affected by the move. ## Pre-GSoC I first got into Git's codebase in February 2025, with my first contribution in March. My first patch was on my microproject and since then I have submitted two more patches on a similar topic. ### Patches - (Microproject) decorate: fix sign comparison warnings Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/afa6b428-3190-42ae-9eac-540c95b576fd@gmail.com/ Status: Merged into master Commit hash: 2bfd3b368572cbf1ce287de09db08b7e7e429ecd Description: Refactoring of decorate.c to replace signed variables with unsigned ones when they are used to iterate over arrays whose sizes are represented by unsigned variables, and remove 2 unnecessary variables which just hold the value of another variable without being modified, replacing them with the variable whose value they were holding. - rm: fix sign comparison warnings Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/38de63ce-6d4e-4f1f-95b1-049df78d9cfc@gmail.com/ Status: Under discussion Description: Refactoring of rm.c to make iterators over arrays whose sizes are represented by unsigned variables unsigned. Specifically in `get_ours_cache_pos`, where before a signed variable was being passed and then inverted in the function, now the already inverted variable is passed as an unsigned variable, with the inversion moved to the function call. - pathspec: fix sign comparison warnings Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/a3aa5f99-63ce-4be5-8d64-fb6e226b3bf9@gmail.com/ Status: Under discussion Description: Refactoring of pathspec.c to make array iterator variables match the type of the variable storing the array's size. Where replacing the variable's type is not possible, because of the large-scale cascade replacements it would cause, an appropriate cast has been added. - environment.h: remove unused variables Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/git/2c547567-2b72-476c-9fc5-71cac050fa15@gmail.com/ Status: Under discussion Description: Removing two variables which did not have any references in the codebase, as they had been moved to `struct repo_settings`, but were not removed from environment.h. ## Proposed Plan - Identifying global variables in environment.c that should be moved and identifying suitable locations, some could be moved directly into `struct repository`, some in its sub-structs that already exist and some in newly created sub-structs. - Identifying and updating occurrences of these variables to reference their new locations. - Identifying all occurrences of `the_repository` and updating them to use a `struct repository` passed to the function. It makes sense that all the variables need not be in the same struct, as separation would keep the codebase organised, and thus easier to maintain. It would also make it easier to introduce these changes systematically, as a group of related variables, combined together in a struct, could be introduced in a single patch series. ### Timeline #### Pre-GSoC (Until May 8) - Explore the codebase, identifying locations where global variables from environment.c are used. - Identify suitable locations for these global variables. #### Community Bonding Period (May 8 - June 1) - Interact with mentor, discussing the locations I have decided, and refining the plan if required. - Start coding early, as my summer break will have started. (See coding period) #### Coding Period (June 2 - August 25) - Move global variables to their new locations in various structs, and refactor functions that depend on them to use their new locations. - Variables which represent settings from config (7 weeks) - Core (5 weeks) - Others (2 weeks) - Variables not from config (3 weeks) - Modify functions to add an `struct repository` argument where they depend on `the_repository` and replace all occurrences of it in the function. #### Final Week (August 25 - September 1) - Fix any bugs that may be left. - Write final report. ### Availability My summer break from college lasts from May to July. I am currently planning on taking a vacation during this period of about 1 week, however, the dates have not been decided. Outside of this vacation, I am not occupied in the break and can devote up to 60 hours a week towards the project. In August, once classes recommence, I will be available for 20 hours a week. ## Post-GSoC After completing my project, I plan on staying active and contributing patches, and start reviewing code. -- Regards, Arnav Bhate (He/Him) ```