# Unexpected effect of log.showSignature on tformat:%H.

5 messages from 2024-11-19 to 2024-11-21. Participants: Niels Möller, Junio C Hamano, brian m. carlson.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/62513

## Niels Möller, 2024-11-19 09:17

Subject: Unexpected effect of log.showSignature on tformat:%H.
Message-ID: <87cyirtweq.fsf@localhost>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/87cyirtweq.fsf%40localhost

```
I had expected the output of git show -s --format='tformat:%H' to be
always the same, and was surprised to find that scripts using this
construction started to fail after I set log.showSignature true.

See filled out bugreport form below, including a repro script.

Regards,
/Niels Möller

Thank you for filling out a Git bug report!
Please answer the following questions to help us understand your issue.

What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue)

  git config --global log.showSignature true

  I'm trying this out to get to see in git log which commits are
  signed.

What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)

  That git show -s --format='tformat:%H' SOME_COMMIT
  should still output the commit hash and nothing more. 

What happened instead? (Actual behavior)

  I get an extra "No signature" line in the output (on stdout, not
  stderr), when looking at a signed commit.

What's different between what you expected and what actually happened?

  The extra output line.

Anything else you want to add:

Here's a small script to reproduce the problem:

-----8<-----
#! /bin/sh

set -eu

export GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL="$(pwd)/git.config"
git config --global log.showSignature true

git clone https://git.glasklar.is/glasklar/trust/audit-log.git
cd audit-log

hash=$(git show -s --format='tformat:%H' e36424e5688572c196d658a5df8c04c20de7606a)

echo "Hash is: |$hash|"
-----8<-----

This is what it looks when I run it:

-----8<-----
$ ./repro.sh 
Cloning into 'audit-log'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 143, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (8/8), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (8/8), done.
remote: Total 143 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 135 (from 1)
Receiving objects: 100% (143/143), 347.00 MiB | 107.22 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (59/59), done.
error: gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile needs to be configured and exist for ssh signature verification
Hash is: |No signature
e36424e5688572c196d658a5df8c04c20de7606a|
-----8<-----

I would have expected the output

Hash is: |e36424e5688572c196d658a5df8c04c20de7606a|

[System Info]
git version:
git version 2.39.5
cpu: x86_64
no commit associated with this build
sizeof-long: 8
sizeof-size_t: 8
shell-path: /bin/sh
uname: Linux 6.1.0-26-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.112-1 (2024-09-30) x86_64
compiler info: gnuc: 12.2
libc info: glibc: 2.40
$SHELL (typically, interactive shell): /bin/bash


[Enabled Hooks]
not run from a git repository - no hooks to show

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2024-11-19 09:37

Subject: Re: Unexpected effect of log.showSignature on tformat:%H.
Message-ID: <xmqqmshvd0nn.fsf@gitster.g>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/xmqqmshvd0nn.fsf%40gitster.g
In-Reply-To: <87cyirtweq.fsf@localhost>

```
Niels Möller <nisse@glasklarteknik.se> writes:

> I had expected the output of git show -s --format='tformat:%H' to be
> always the same, and was surprised to find that scripts using this
> construction started to fail after I set log.showSignature true.

It is a bit unexpected, but knowing how the command options evolved,
it is not all that surprising X-<.  If you are using --format, you
are expected to use the %G placeholder and friends when you are
interested in signatures.  The --show-signature option is unaware of
the other formatting options like --pretty={short,oneline,fuller, so
it is understandable (not "expected") what you are seeing.


```

## Niels Möller, 2024-11-19 10:06

Subject: Re: Unexpected effect of log.showSignature on tformat:%H.
Message-ID: <878qtftu5e.fsf@localhost>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/878qtftu5e.fsf%40localhost
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmshvd0nn.fsf@gitster.g>

```
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> It is a bit unexpected, but knowing how the command options evolved,
> it is not all that surprising X-<.  If you are using --format, you
> are expected to use the %G placeholder and friends when you are
> interested in signatures.

The thing is, I'm generally interested in signatures when using git
interactively (that's why I enabled log.showSignature globally). But
then I have a scripted usecase that has a tag name, and needs to query
the corresponding commit hash, and in that context, I don't care about
signatures at all. The docs for git show say that %H expands to the
commit hash, which is exactly what I want. I didn't know about the %G
formats, but after a quick look at the docs, I don't think they solves
that problem.

I can work around this problem by using "export
GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL=/dev/null" in the script, which I guess might be
generally good practice when using git in scripts? But I still think it
would be useful if there were an easy and reliable way to get from tag
to commit hash, regardless of the user's config settings.

Regards,
/Niels Möller

```

## brian m. carlson, 2024-11-19 22:14

Subject: Re: Unexpected effect of log.showSignature on tformat:%H.
Message-ID: <Zz0NsaM-KFRXzBp6@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/Zz0NsaM-KFRXzBp6%40tapette.crustytoothpaste.net
In-Reply-To: <87cyirtweq.fsf@localhost>

```
On 2024-11-19 at 09:17:33, Niels Möller wrote:
> I had expected the output of git show -s --format='tformat:%H' to be
> always the same, and was surprised to find that scripts using this
> construction started to fail after I set log.showSignature true.
> 
> See filled out bugreport form below, including a repro script.
> 
> Regards,
> /Niels Möller
> 
> Thank you for filling out a Git bug report!
> Please answer the following questions to help us understand your issue.
> 
> What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue)
> 
>   git config --global log.showSignature true
> 
>   I'm trying this out to get to see in git log which commits are
>   signed.
> 
> What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)
> 
>   That git show -s --format='tformat:%H' SOME_COMMIT
>   should still output the commit hash and nothing more.

git show is a porcelain, and it can be affected by options, such as
`log.showSignature`.  If you want predictable behaviour, you need a
plumbing command, whose behaviour isn't affected by configuration in
this way.  The equivalent to what you've requested is this:

    git rev-list --no-commit-header -1 -s --format='tformat:%H' SOME_COMMIT

I've confirmed that works correctly even if `log.showSignature` is set.
-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

```

## Niels Möller, 2024-11-21 09:08

Subject: Re: Unexpected effect of log.showSignature on tformat:%H.
Message-ID: <874j41t0mi.fsf@localhost>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/874j41t0mi.fsf%40localhost
In-Reply-To: <Zz0NsaM-KFRXzBp6@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net>

```
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:

> git show is a porcelain, and it can be affected by options, such as
> `log.showSignature`.  If you want predictable behaviour, you need a
> plumbing command, whose behaviour isn't affected by configuration in
> this way.  The equivalent to what you've requested is this:
>
>     git rev-list --no-commit-header -1 -s --format='tformat:%H' SOME_COMMIT
>
> I've confirmed that works correctly even if `log.showSignature` is set.

Thanks! It seems the way to understand this is that git show can display
a bunch of different things, depending on configuration, and --tformat
affects only one of potentially many output lines.

So git rev-list solves this problem. My script (which creates a file
archive, in a reproducible fashion, from a list if git repos and (signed)
tags) uses a few more git commands:

  git clone
  git ls-files
  git -c gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile=... tag --verify
  git submodule

Of these, it appears only ls-files is listed as a "plumbing" command. I
wonder if I still need to stick to GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL=/dev/null to avoid
surprises for the clone, tag and submodule commands?

Any advice appreciated.

Regards,
/Niels

```
