threads / patch / 62014

patcht-reftable-block: mark unused argv/argc

Subject: [PATCH] t-reftable-block: mark unused argv/argc

## tl;dr

One message between Aug 28, 2024 and Aug 28, 2024. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 0people: 1as markdown or json

Jeff King· Aug 28, 2024, 04:08 UTC · lore

This is conceptually the same as the cases in df9d638c24 (unit-tests: ignore unused argc/argv, 2024-08-17), but this unit test was migrated from the reftable tests in a parallel branch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
This should go on top of cp/unit-test-reftable-block. It could also be
done as an evil merge when we merge with the final unused-parameter
topic, but I think doing it this way is less confusing.
 t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Show changes to t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c +1 −1
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c
index 582a8e6036..f0124fc3d0 100644
--- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c
+++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-block.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static void t_index_block_read_write(void)
 		reftable_record_release(&recs[i]);
 }
 
-int cmd_main(int argc, const char *argv[])
+int cmd_main(int argc UNUSED, const char *argv[] UNUSED)
 {
 	TEST(t_index_block_read_write(), "read-write operations on index blocks work");
 	TEST(t_log_block_read_write(), "read-write operations on log blocks work");
-- 
2.46.0.754.g24c813f009

← back to recent threads