Milan Hauth"git mv" followed by "git push" or "git pull" can produce wasteful transfers of blob objects
these transfers are wasteful because the blob object already exists in the destination repo but "git push" or "git pull" fail to see that
this affects only some cases of "git mv" in some cases, the deduplication works as expected in other cases, dedup fails
this is neglegible for small files, but noticable with large files
in my case, i tried to move 5GB of files (250 x 20MB) and i was surprised as "git push" wanted to transfer 5GB instead of a few bytes for the tree and commit objects
to reproduce: see repro.sh in https://github.com/milahu/git-bug-git-mv-wasteful-transfer
output of repro.sh
the first size is the transfer size before "git mv" the second size is the transfer size after "git mv"
pass: 1.00 MiB != 288 bytes # path_a=file_a; path_b=file_b pass: 1.00 MiB != 331 bytes # path_a=dir/file_a; path_b=dir/file_b pass: 1.00 MiB != 286 bytes # path_a=dir_a/file; path_b=dir_b/file pass: 1.00 MiB != 284 bytes # path_a=file; path_b=dir/file pass: 1.00 MiB != 329 bytes # path_a=file; path_b=dir1/dir2/file pass: 1.00 MiB != 373 bytes # path_a=file; path_b=dir1/dir2/dir3/file pass: 1.00 MiB != 331 bytes # path_a=file_a; path_b=dir/file_b pass: 1.00 MiB != 376 bytes # path_a=file_a; path_b=dir1/dir2/file_b pass: 1.00 MiB != 420 bytes # path_a=file_a; path_b=dir1/dir2/dir3/file_b pass: 1.00 MiB != 241 bytes # path_a=dir/file; path_b=file FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir1/dir2/file; path_b=file FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir1/dir2/dir3/file; path_b=file FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir/file_a; path_b=file_b FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir1/dir2/file_a; path_b=file_b FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir1/dir2/dir3/file_a; path_b=file_b FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir1a/dir2a/file; path_b=dir1b/dir2b/file FAIL: 1.00 MiB == 1.00 MiB # path_a=dir1a/file_a; path_b=dir1b/file_b
see also
https://colabti.org/ircloggy/git/2024-02-24#l704
https://colabti.org/ircloggy/git/2024-02-25#l218
https://colabti.org/ircloggy/git/2024-02-25#l269
> I have a strong déjà vu about this also; I think we talked about this exact thing a while ago
> this, same: https://colabti.org/ircloggy/git/2023-09-13#l912
https://colabti.org/ircloggy/git/2024-02-25#l404
https://colabti.org/ircloggy/git/2024-02-25#l433
> reading that SO answer by jthill but can't quite get the whole picture from it -- is it saying that it's a trade-off in sending all the objects vs. spending resources trying to figure out what to send?
> I bet there's an opportunity for optimization here; Git could probably figure out a good balance based on how much data it is about to send
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48228425/git-push-new-branch-with-same-files-uploads-all-files-again