Working on a little darcs2git script, I found the following inconsistency
git-commit supports -m and -F git-tag supports only -m
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
threads / discuss / 6058
Subject: UI: git-tag should support -F as well
Working on a little darcs2git script, I found the following inconsistency
git-commit supports -m and -F git-tag supports only -m
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
[PATCH] git-tag: support -F <file> option
This imitates the behaviour of git-commit.
Noticed by Han-Wen Nienhuys.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> ---
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Working on a little darcs2git script, I found the following > inconsistency > > git-commit supports -m and -F > git-tag supports only -m
How about this?
Documentation/git-tag.txt | 6 +++++- git-tag.sh | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt index 45476c2..48b82b8 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ git-tag - Create a tag object signed with GPG SYNOPSIS -------- [verse] -'git-tag' [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f | -d] [-m <msg>] <name> [<head>] +'git-tag' [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f | -d] [-m <msg> | -F <file>] + <name> [<head>] 'git-tag' -l [<pattern>] DESCRIPTION @@ -60,6 +61,9 @@ OPTIONS -m <msg>:: Use the given tag message (instead of prompting) +-F <file>:: + Take the tag message from the given file. Use '-' to + read the message from the standard input. Author ------ diff --git a/git-tag.sh b/git-tag.sh index d53f94c..36cd6aa 100755 --- a/git-tag.sh +++ b/git-tag.sh @@ -45,6 +45,17 @@ do message_given=1 fi ;; + -F) + annotate=1 + shift + if test "$#" = "0"; then + die "error: option -F needs an argument" + exit 2 + else + message="$(cat "$1")" + message_given=1 + fi + ;; -u) annotate=1 signed=1
-- 1.4.4.3.g0ba4
Re: [PATCH] git-tag: support -F <file> option
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> This imitates the behaviour of git-commit. > > Noticed by Han-Wen Nienhuys. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Ok, but what the **** is "die ...; exit 2" sequence?
> @@ -45,6 +45,17 @@ do > message_given=1 > fi > ;; > + -F) > + annotate=1 > + shift > + if test "$#" = "0"; then > + die "error: option -F needs an argument" > + exit 2 > + else > + message="$(cat "$1")" > + message_given=1 > + fi > + ;;
I know it was copied from Han-Wen's aabd7693, but was this somehow to catch the case where die can fail???
Re: [PATCH] git-tag: support -F <file> option
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> > + if test "$#" = "0"; then > > + die "error: option -F needs an argument" > > + exit 2 > > + ;; > > I know it was copied from Han-Wen's aabd7693, but was this > somehow to catch the case where die can fail???
What, you haven't heard of the /bin/resurrection shell?
Apparently one of its features is it can sometimes make die return successfully, even days after the initial call. :-)
-- Shawn.
Re: [PATCH] git-tag: support -F <file> option
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > This imitates the behaviour of git-commit. > > > > Noticed by Han-Wen Nienhuys. > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> > > Ok, but what the **** is "die ...; exit 2" sequence?
;-) I did not even bother reading the code when I copied it.
Ciao, Dscho