# Bug with splits in new nvimdiff layout

3 messages from 2022-07-07 to 2022-07-08. Participants: Matthew Klein, Junio C Hamano, Fernando Ramos.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/58120

## Matthew Klein, 2022-07-07 16:58

Subject: Bug with splits in new nvimdiff layout
Message-ID: <CACRpdvnuAYY0U1_3uD8zKgtq05+bgwjzXpZKomro6gqYDNrjGg@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CACRpdvnuAYY0U1_3uD8zKgtq05%2BbgwjzXpZKomro6gqYDNrjGg%40mail.gmail.com

```
Hi,

I encountered a bug when using the new vimdiff layout format.

To recreate this, start with a merge conflict, and merge with this command:

    git mergetool --tool=nvimdiff

I expected the layout to be:

    ------------------------------------------
    |             |           |              |
    |   LOCAL     |   BASE    |   REMOTE     |
    |             |           |              |
    ------------------------------------------
    |                                        |
    |                MERGED                  |
    |                                        |
    ------------------------------------------

The layout when I ran the command was:

    ------------------------------------------
    |                                        |
    |                LOCAL                   |
    |                                        |
    ------------------------------------------
    |             |           |              |
    |   LOCAL     |   LOCAL   |   MERGED     |
    |             |           |              |
    ------------------------------------------

I expected the layout to be the same as what was documented to be the default
for "nvimdiff".

In my init.vim configuration file, I have these lines set:

    set splitbelow
    set splitright

These options globally change the behaviour of the "split" command so that
instead of "split" creating a new window above the current window, or to the
left when used with "vertical", it does the opposite. Docs:
https://neovim.io/doc/user/options.html#'splitbelow'

I recommend using the "leftabove" (a.k.a "aboveleft") command together with
"split". Since these windows are positioned absolutely (according to
"mergetool.nvimdiff.layout"), it shouldn't depend on the user's configuration.
Docs: https://neovim.io/doc/user/windows.html#:leftabove

The previous invocation (i.e. "4wincmd w | wincmd J") didn't run into this
issue, since its not affected by the "splitbelow" and "splitright" options.

Hope this helps,

Matthew

[System Info]
git version:
git version 2.37.0
cpu: x86_64
no commit associated with this build
sizeof-long: 8
sizeof-size_t: 8
shell-path: /bin/sh
uname: Linux 5.18.9-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat, 02 Jul 2022
21:03:06 +0000 x86_64
compiler info: gnuc: 12.1
libc info: glibc: 2.35
$SHELL (typically, interactive shell): /bin/bash


[Enabled Hooks]

```

## Junio C Hamano, 2022-07-07 18:46

Subject: Re: Bug with splits in new nvimdiff layout
Message-ID: <xmqqo7y0zrp3.fsf@gitster.g>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/xmqqo7y0zrp3.fsf%40gitster.g
In-Reply-To: <CACRpdvnuAYY0U1_3uD8zKgtq05+bgwjzXpZKomro6gqYDNrjGg@mail.gmail.com>

```
Matthew Klein <mklein994@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I encountered a bug when using the new vimdiff layout format.

Thanks for a report.

Fernando (the author of the layout engine)?  Can you take a look?

> To recreate this, start with a merge conflict, and merge with this command:
>
>     git mergetool --tool=nvimdiff
>
> I expected the layout to be:
>
>     ------------------------------------------
>     |             |           |              |
>     |   LOCAL     |   BASE    |   REMOTE     |
>     |             |           |              |
>     ------------------------------------------
>     |                                        |
>     |                MERGED                  |
>     |                                        |
>     ------------------------------------------
>
> The layout when I ran the command was:
>
>     ------------------------------------------
>     |                                        |
>     |                LOCAL                   |
>     |                                        |
>     ------------------------------------------
>     |             |           |              |
>     |   LOCAL     |   LOCAL   |   MERGED     |
>     |             |           |              |
>     ------------------------------------------
>
> I expected the layout to be the same as what was documented to be the default
> for "nvimdiff".
>
> In my init.vim configuration file, I have these lines set:
>
>     set splitbelow
>     set splitright
>
> These options globally change the behaviour of the "split" command so that
> instead of "split" creating a new window above the current window, or to the
> left when used with "vertical", it does the opposite. Docs:
> https://neovim.io/doc/user/options.html#'splitbelow'
>
> I recommend using the "leftabove" (a.k.a "aboveleft") command together with
> "split". Since these windows are positioned absolutely (according to
> "mergetool.nvimdiff.layout"), it shouldn't depend on the user's configuration.
> Docs: https://neovim.io/doc/user/windows.html#:leftabove
>
> The previous invocation (i.e. "4wincmd w | wincmd J") didn't run into this
> issue, since its not affected by the "splitbelow" and "splitright" options.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Matthew
>
> [System Info]
> git version:
> git version 2.37.0
> cpu: x86_64
> no commit associated with this build
> sizeof-long: 8
> sizeof-size_t: 8
> shell-path: /bin/sh
> uname: Linux 5.18.9-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat, 02 Jul 2022
> 21:03:06 +0000 x86_64
> compiler info: gnuc: 12.1
> libc info: glibc: 2.35
> $SHELL (typically, interactive shell): /bin/bash
>
>
> [Enabled Hooks]

```

## Fernando Ramos, 2022-07-08 17:06

Subject: Re: Bug with splits in new nvimdiff layout
Message-ID: <YshkFWZfBMbuN/tI@zacax395.localdomain>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/YshkFWZfBMbuN%2FtI%40zacax395.localdomain
In-Reply-To: <xmqqo7y0zrp3.fsf@gitster.g>

```
On 22/07/07 11:46AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthew Klein <mklein994@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I encountered a bug when using the new vimdiff layout format.
> 
> Thanks for a report.
> 
> Fernando (the author of the layout engine)?  Can you take a look?
> 
No problem! 

The description from Matthew already includes a proposed solution (thanks!)
which should work.

Let me implement and test it this weekend and I'll get back to you.


```
