threads / discuss / 57061

Issue with git clone via http/https and alternates

Subject: Issue with git clone via http/https and alternates

## tl;dr

2 messages between Dec 9, 2021 and Dec 10, 2021.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Ralf Baechle· Dec 9, 2021, 19:59 UTC · lore

I'm hosting a number of largish repositories which being very similar are using git's alternates feature to save disk and memory. Cloning via git:// or ssh for users with accounts on the server works as expected but cloning via http or https results fails as follows:

$ git clone http://git.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/linux-mti.git Cloning into 'linux-mti'... warning: alternate disabled by http.followRedirects: http://git.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/ralf/linux.git/ error: Unable to find e4add961d4aaeb19f607f6d7bea8d59e1bd39ff0 under http://git.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/linux-mti.git Fetching objects: 11, done. Cannot obtain needed object e4add961d4aaeb19f607f6d7bea8d59e1bd39ff0 while processing commit 9e2bf7cf7d9003c0f06736be5218ed79234f254c. error: fetch failed.

Adding -c http.followRedirects=true will make the clone succeed. Question, shouldn't the default of http.followRedirects=initial already suffice?

Anyway, what I'm looking for is something I can do serverside so users cloning the repository are not bothered with this http.followRedirects business. Is there anything I can do?

Thanks,
  Ralf
Jeff King· Dec 10, 2021, 04:08 UTC · re: Ralf Baechle · lore

Re: Issue with git clone via http/https and alternates

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 08:59:14PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> I'm hosting a number of largish repositories which being very similar
> are using git's alternates feature to save disk and memory.  Cloning via
> git:// or ssh for users with accounts on the server works as expected but
> cloning via http or https results fails as follows:
> 
> $ git clone http://git.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/linux-mti.git
> Cloning into 'linux-mti'...
> warning: alternate disabled by http.followRedirects: http://git.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/ralf/linux.git/
> error: Unable to find e4add961d4aaeb19f607f6d7bea8d59e1bd39ff0 under http://git.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/linux-mti.git
> Fetching objects: 11, done.
> Cannot obtain needed object e4add961d4aaeb19f607f6d7bea8d59e1bd39ff0
> while processing commit 9e2bf7cf7d9003c0f06736be5218ed79234f254c.
> error: fetch failed.
> 
> Adding -c http.followRedirects=true will make the clone succeed. Question,
> shouldn't the default of http.followRedirects=initial already suffice?

There are security implications to allowing more redirects. See cb4d2d35c4 (http: treat http-alternates like redirects, 2016-12-06). That commit message does mention that we could be more lenient for same-server redirects here, but AFAIK this is the first time anybody cared enough to even bring it up the list.

That said...
> Anyway, what I'm looking for is something I can do serverside so users
> cloning the repository are not bothered with this http.followRedirects
> business.  Is there anything I can do?

Turn on smart-http support for your server. The dumb-http protocol is rather inefficient, and is what requires the client to even know about your server-side alternates in the first place. And personally, I have a lot less trust in it in general, compared to smart-http. There have been tons of fixes and improvements in the smart-http code in the past 10 years, and I don't think anybody is really paying much attention to dumb-http.

-Peff

← back to recent threads