# GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 8 messages from 2005-05-11 to 2005-05-11. Participants: Alexey Nezhdanov, David Greaves, David Woodhouse, Mark Brown. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/569 ## Alexey Nezhdanov, 2005-05-11 07:41 Subject: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <200505111141.27725.snake@penza-gsm.ru> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200505111141.27725.snake%40penza-gsm.ru ``` Hello. GIT refuses to compile on Debian sarge on sparc64. Probably some compile flag is incompartible but can't figure out which. ============================= webmaster@www:/tmp/cogito-0.10$ make cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o read-cache.o read-cache.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o sha1_file.o sha1_file.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o usage.o usage.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o object.o object.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o commit.o commit.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o tree.o tree.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o blob.o blob.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o tag.o tag.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o date.o date.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o strbuf.o strbuf.c cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -c -o diff.o diff.c ar rcs libgit.a read-cache.o sha1_file.o usage.o object.o commit.o tree.o blob.o tag.o date.o strbuf.o diff.o cc -g -O2 -Wall '-DSHA1_HEADER=' -o git-update-cache update-cache.c libgit.a -lz -lssl /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/bin/../lib/libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/bin/../lib/libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [git-update-cache] Error 1 webmaster@www:/tmp/cogito-0.10$ -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov ``` ## David Greaves, 2005-05-11 08:01 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <4281BBC4.8060709@dgreaves.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/4281BBC4.8060709%40dgreaves.com In-Reply-To: <200505111141.27725.snake@penza-gsm.ru> ``` Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: >Hello. GIT refuses to compile on Debian sarge on sparc64. >Probably some compile flag is incompartible but can't figure out which. > > read the error message: >/usr/bin/ld: skipping >incompatible /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libz.so when > > hmm... libz.so >/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz > > Can't find often equals "not installed" So go to aptitude, search for zlib You'll find libz-dev Install it Or just run apt-get install libz-dev And try again David ``` ## Alexey Nezhdanov, 2005-05-11 09:32 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <200505111332.38491.snake@penza-gsm.ru> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200505111332.38491.snake%40penza-gsm.ru In-Reply-To: <4281BBC4.8060709@dgreaves.com> ``` Wensday, 11 May 2005 12:01 David Greaves wrote: > Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > >Hello. GIT refuses to compile on Debian sarge on sparc64. > >Probably some compile flag is incompartible but can't figure out which. > > read the error message: > >/usr/bin/ld: skipping > >incompatible /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.3/../../../libz.so when > > hmm... > libz.so > > >/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz > > Can't find often equals "not installed" webmaster@www:/tmp/cogito-0.10$ ls -l /usr/lib/libz.so lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9 2005-05-11 11:18 /usr/lib/libz.so -> libz.so.1 webmaster@www:/tmp/cogito-0.10$ ls -l /usr/lib/libz.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 83610 2004-12-07 21:38 /usr/lib/libz.a > > So go to aptitude, search for zlib > You'll find libz-dev > Install it > > Or just run > apt-get install libz-dev > > And try again Nope, not helped. www:/home/snake# apt-get install libz-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Note, selecting zlib1g-dev instead of libz-dev zlib1g-dev is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 307 not upgraded. www:/home/snake# > > David > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov ``` ## David Woodhouse, 2005-05-11 11:01 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <1115809273.16187.493.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1115809273.16187.493.camel%40hades.cambridge.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200505111141.27725.snake@penza-gsm.ru> ``` On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 11:41 +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.so when searching for -lz > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.a when searching for -lz > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz Libraries which are in /usr/lib as opposed to /usr/lib64 are presumably 64-bit. Since the linker is claiming that they're incompatible, I assume your compiler is defaulting to 64-bit output. Try adding '-m32' to CFLAGS, or installing 64-bit libz. -- dwmw2 ``` ## David Woodhouse, 2005-05-11 11:58 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <1115812736.16187.494.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/1115812736.16187.494.camel%40hades.cambridge.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <1115809273.16187.493.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> ``` On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 12:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Libraries which are in /usr/lib as opposed to /usr/lib64 are presumably > 64-bit. Der.... I mean 32-bit, obviously; otherwise the rest wouldn't make sense: > Since the linker is claiming that they're incompatible, I assume > your compiler is defaulting to 64-bit output. Try adding '-m32' to > CFLAGS, or installing 64-bit libz. -- dwmw2 ``` ## Mark Brown, 2005-05-11 12:34 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <20050511123425.GA28547@projectcolo.org.uk> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20050511123425.GA28547%40projectcolo.org.uk In-Reply-To: <1115812736.16187.494.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> ``` On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:58:56PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 12:01 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Libraries which are in /usr/lib as opposed to /usr/lib64 are presumably > > 64-bit. > Der.... I mean 32-bit, obviously; otherwise the rest wouldn't make > sense: Yes, that is the case for Debian. > > Since the linker is claiming that they're incompatible, I assume > > your compiler is defaulting to 64-bit output. Try adding '-m32' to > > CFLAGS, or installing 64-bit libz. ...provided in the lib64z1-dev package. I'm not sure if there is a 64 bit libssl package, though. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." ``` ## Alexey Nezhdanov, 2005-05-11 12:57 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <200505111657.14424.snake@penza-gsm.ru> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200505111657.14424.snake%40penza-gsm.ru In-Reply-To: <1115809273.16187.493.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> ``` Wensday, 11 May 2005 15:01 David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 11:41 +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.so when searching for > > -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.a when searching for > > -lz /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz > > Libraries which are in /usr/lib as opposed to /usr/lib64 are presumably > 64-bit. Since the linker is claiming that they're incompatible, I assume > your compiler is defaulting to 64-bit output. Try adding '-m32' to > CFLAGS, or installing 64-bit libz. Thank you very much. -m32 helped. 64bits libz and libcurl are missing. -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov ``` ## Alexey Nezhdanov, 2005-05-11 13:01 Subject: Re: GIT compile error on Sun Sparc SB2000 Message-ID: <200505111701.26303.snake@penza-gsm.ru> URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/200505111701.26303.snake%40penza-gsm.ru In-Reply-To: <200505111657.14424.snake@penza-gsm.ru> ``` Wensday, 11 May 2005 16:57 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > 64bits libz and libcurl are missing. Just to be correct: libssl and libcurl actually. But this already makes no sense. -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov ```