# Re: [PATCH] http-backend: remove a duplicated code branch 2 messages from 2021-10-24 to 2021-10-24. Participants: Robin Dupret. Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/56775 ## Robin Dupret, 2021-10-24 17:23 Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-backend: remove a duplicated code branch Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CF7T869H4UYO.3GYODDJ6QKL27%40MacBook-Pro-de-Robin-3.local ``` In-Reply-To: xmqqbl3u5fhy.fsf@gitster.g Cc: Jeff King , Robin Dupret , git@vger.kernel.org, Robin Dupret , junio@pobox.com Hello, Sorry for the late reply, I'm not really familiar with mailing lists. I resent the patch with an ammended commit message. Actually, the goal is not to add any maintainance burden. I just thought the original prose was not really intentional. Feel free to discard this patch if you doubt it brings any improvement to the code. I'd be happy to send a more substantial patch later if the opportunity arrises. :-) (Thanks for your comments and again for all your work on this great tool !) ``` ## Robin Dupret, 2021-10-24 17:29 Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-backend: remove a duplicated code branch Message-ID: URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CA%2BG124W0UnQ_qBUwL6UAEu81ugpo%3DEYR-QS%3DxX63afbYvAEBoQ%40mail.gmail.com In-Reply-To: ``` Hello, Sorry for the late reply, I'm not really familiar with mailing lists. I resent the patch with an ammended commit message. Actually, the goal is not to add any maintainance burden. I just thought the original prose was not really intentional. Feel free to discard this patch if you doubt it brings any improvement to the code. I'd be happy to send a more substantial patch later if the opportunity arrises. :-) (Thanks for your comments and again for all your work on this great tool !) Le dim. 24 oct. 2021 à 19:25, Robin Dupret a écrit : > > In-Reply-To: xmqqbl3u5fhy.fsf@gitster.g > Cc: Jeff King , Robin Dupret , git@vger.kernel.org, Robin Dupret , junio@pobox.com > > Hello, > > Sorry for the late reply, I'm not really familiar with mailing lists. > I resent the patch with an ammended commit message. > > Actually, the goal is not to add any maintainance burden. I just thought > the original prose was not really intentional. Feel free to discard this > patch if you doubt it brings any improvement to the code. > > I'd be happy to send a more substantial patch later if the opportunity > arrises. :-) > > (Thanks for your comments and again for all your work on this great > tool !) ```