threads / announce / 567

[ANNOUNCE] git-pb git tree

Subject: [ANNOUNCE] git-pb git tree

## tl;dr

2 messages between May 11, 2005 and May 11, 2005.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Petr Baudis· May 11, 2005, 03:16 UTC · lore
  Hello,
  I've published the git-pb git tree. This is a purely "core GIT" tree,
with no traces of Cogito itself inside, and intended to be safe-to-pull
for Linus. It will hopefully be soon fully synchronized by the GIT part
of the Cogito tree (it already has all the important bits), and will
stay so - any GIT stuff will go to the Cogito tree through the git-pb
tree.
  I plan to integrate the well-looking core git patches flying through
the mailing list to the git-pb tree, as well as various own stuff
(related or not related to what Cogito needs for operating well).  I
will be pulling from Linus on regular basis, and from git-jc too if I
feel comfortable with what's inside.
  I'm also thinking about git-pbc for the possibly controversial stuff
(taking care of hidden files, perhaps librarifications).
  You get it as a Git tree at
	rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/git-pb.git
	http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/git-pb.git
  On related note, I've set up a Git->CIA gateway. CIA is a commit
aggregator, tracking large number of open source projects. Cogito's and
git-pb's corner is at http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/Cogito, the
commits are also broadcasted to the #git OPN channel (which is the point
of the whole thing, after all ;-).
  Have fun,
-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
Junio C Hamano· May 11, 2005, 04:11 UTC · re: Petr Baudis · lore

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pb git tree

>>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> writes:

PB> Hello, PB> I've published the git-pb git tree. This is a purely "core GIT" tree, PB> ... PB> You get it as a Git tree at

PB> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/git-pb.git PB> http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/cogito/git-pb.git

Good, this is what I was waiting for.

Just in case people are wondering, all of what's there in the current git-jc tree, except for one two liner documentation fix, is already included in the git-pb tree, so there is no reason for people other than Petr to pull from git-jc at this moment.

← back to recent threads