threads / discuss / 56397

Draft of Git Rev News edition 78

Subject: Draft of Git Rev News edition 78

## tl;dr

5 messages between Aug 29, 2021 and Aug 31, 2021.

replies: 4people: 2as markdown or json

Christian Couder· Aug 29, 2021, 10:21 UTC · lore
Hi everyone!
A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:
  https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-78.md

Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on this GitHub issue:

  https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/518
You can also reply to this email.

In general all kinds of contributions, for example proofreading, suggestions for articles or links, help on the issues in GitHub, and so on, are very much appreciated.

I tried to Cc everyone who appears in this edition, but maybe I missed some people, sorry about that.

Jakub, Markus, Kaartic and I plan to publish this edition on Saturday July 31st.

Thanks, Christian.

Christian Couder· Aug 29, 2021, 10:23 UTC · re: Christian Couder · lore

Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 78

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 12:21 PM Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jakub, Markus, Kaartic and I plan to publish this edition on Saturday July 31st.
Actually on Thursday August 31st. Sorry.
Philip Oakley· Aug 29, 2021, 19:53 UTC · re: Christian Couder · lore

Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 78

Tuesday? 31st August..
On 29/08/2021 11:23, Christian Couder wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 12:21 PM Christian Couder
> <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jakub, Markus, Kaartic and I plan to publish this edition on Saturday July 31st.
> Actually on Thursday August 31st. Sorry.
Christian Couder· Aug 31, 2021, 13:36 UTC · lore

Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 78

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 11:36 PM Markus Jansen <mja@jansen-preisler.de> wrote:
>
> Tried to sort out tenses in the story, and added my usual tiny amount of correction suggestions in 34d65d4.
> As usual, feel free to further correct/revert/rephrase etc.
Thanks for the fixes! They LGTM!
> I like the backreferences to past editions, which I regard being a build-up mechanism for a collective/community memory :-).

Yeah, it's a balance between making things more useful without making the text harder to read. But I think so far the result has been positive.

← back to recent threads