# [PATCH] configure.ac: fix misspell in comments

2 messages from 2021-08-05 to 2021-08-05. Participants: zegolem, Taylor Blau.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/56217

## zegolem, 2021-08-05 00:03

Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: fix misspell in comments
Message-ID: <HE1PR05MB3371C8B2A590C32E0FDD212DD3F29@HE1PR05MB3371.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/HE1PR05MB3371C8B2A590C32E0FDD212DD3F29%40HE1PR05MB3371.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com

```
There are two places in the file where 'you are' was written as 'your
are'.

Signed-off-by: ZIEGLER Florian <zegolem1383@outlook.fr>
---

Note: I didn't review the full file for other errors

 configure.ac | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 031e8d3fee..44fd314a2e 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ else
 fi
 GIT_CONF_SUBST([NO_REGEX])
 #
-# Define FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES if your are on a system which succeeds
+# Define FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES if you are on a system which succeeds
 # when attempting to read from an fopen'ed directory.
 AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether system succeeds to read fopen'ed directory],
  [ac_cv_fread_reads_directories],
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ else
 fi
 GIT_CONF_SUBST([FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES])
 #
-# Define SNPRINTF_RETURNS_BOGUS if your are on a system which snprintf()
+# Define SNPRINTF_RETURNS_BOGUS if you are on a system which snprintf()
 # or vsnprintf() return -1 instead of number of characters which would
 # have been written to the final string if enough space had been available.
 AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether snprintf() and/or vsnprintf() return bogus value],
-- 
2.32.0


```

## Taylor Blau, 2021-08-05 01:34

Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure.ac: fix misspell in comments
Message-ID: <YQtAKABgIjyEs2yr@nand.local>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/YQtAKABgIjyEs2yr%40nand.local
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR05MB3371C8B2A590C32E0FDD212DD3F29@HE1PR05MB3371.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

```
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 02:03:47AM +0200, zegolem wrote:
> There are two places in the file where 'you are' was written as 'your
> are'.

Thanks; these both look obviously correct to me.

> Note: I didn't review the full file for other errors

I took a brief look. Those two are the only instances of 'your are'. I
looked through all uses of 'your' to make sure there weren't other
typos, and I couldn't find any either.

Thanks,
Taylor

```
