# Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description

1 messages from 2021-05-13 to 2021-05-13. Participants: Teng Long.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/55681

## Teng Long, 2021-05-13 06:44

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] packfile-uri.txt: fix blobPackfileUri description
Message-ID: <CADMgQSR=f0kAnX0Fat2vSpVaG62WX9VAkU0xNeN_hiDaHXu-eA@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CADMgQSR%3Df0kAnX0Fat2vSpVaG62WX9VAkU0xNeN_hiDaHXu-eA%40mail.gmail.com

```
Junio C Hamano writes:

>Yes.  Some people seem to omit the final response to reviewer
>suggestions on the previous round and just send a revised patch, but
>it is much nicer to cleanly conclude the review cycle for the
>previous round with a separate response (it could just be "yes,
>you're right---I'll incorporate your suggestions in the next round,
>thanks") before starting a new cycle.

If I  send a new patch cycle, the "--thread"  argument seems
to be recommended. This may be the reason why it is easier
to understand when submitting a series of patches?

I may try to use "--thread", but it may make this whole
patch more confusing, sorry for that.

```
