threads / patch / 55159

patchdoc: fix naming of response-end-pkt

Subject: [OUTREACHY][PATCH v1] doc: fix naming of response-end-pkt

## tl;dr

4 messages between Feb 16, 2021 and Feb 18, 2021. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 3people: 3as markdown or json

Joey Salazar· Feb 16, 2021, 21:21 UTC · lore

Git Protocol version 2[1] defines 0002 as a Message Packet that indicates the end of a response for stateless connections.

Change the naming of the 0002 Packet to 'Response end' to match the parsing introduced in Wireshark's MR !1922 for consistency.

[1] kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/technical/protocol-v2.html [2] gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/1922

Signed-off-by: Joey Salazar <jgsal@protonmail.com>
---
 Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Show changes to Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt +2 −3
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt b/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
index e597b74da39..6c55d566d8b 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ In protocol v2 these special packets will have the following semantics:

   * '0000' Flush Packet (flush-pkt) - indicates the end of a message
   * '0001' Delimiter Packet (delim-pkt) - separates sections of a message
-  * '0002' Message Packet (response-end-pkt) - indicates the end of a response
-    for stateless connections
+  * '0002' Response end Packet (response_end-pkt) - indicates the end of a
+    response for stateless connections

 Initial Client Request
 ----------------------
--
2.29.0.rc2
Junio C Hamano· Feb 16, 2021, 23:03 UTC · re: Joey Salazar · lore

Re: [OUTREACHY][PATCH v1] doc: fix naming of response-end-pkt

Joey Salazar <jgsal@protonmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Git Protocol version 2[1] defines 0002 as a Message Packet that indicates
> the end of a response for stateless connections.
>
> Change the naming of the 0002 Packet to 'Response end' to match the
> parsing introduced in Wireshark's MR !1922 for consistency.
>
> [1] kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/technical/protocol-v2.html
> [2] gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/1922
>
> Signed-off-by: Joey Salazar <jgsal@protonmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

This came from b0df0c16 (stateless-connect: send response end packet, 2020-05-19), didn't it?

The original commit even says "response end packet" on its title, so I am reasonably sure the patch under discussion is an improvement ;-)

Having said that, asking its author to review the change would be the most appropriate (cc'ed).

Thanks.
Show 18 quoted lines
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt b/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
> index e597b74da39..6c55d566d8b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ In protocol v2 these special packets will have the following semantics:
>
>    * '0000' Flush Packet (flush-pkt) - indicates the end of a message
>    * '0001' Delimiter Packet (delim-pkt) - separates sections of a message
> -  * '0002' Message Packet (response-end-pkt) - indicates the end of a response
> -    for stateless connections
> +  * '0002' Response end Packet (response_end-pkt) - indicates the end of a
> +    response for stateless connections
>
>  Initial Client Request
>  ----------------------
> --
> 2.29.0.rc2
Denton Liu· Feb 17, 2021, 11:07 UTC · re: Joey Salazar · lore

Re: [OUTREACHY][PATCH v1] doc: fix naming of response-end-pkt

Hi Joey,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:21:50PM +0000, Joey Salazar wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Git Protocol version 2[1] defines 0002 as a Message Packet that indicates
> the end of a response for stateless connections.
> 
> Change the naming of the 0002 Packet to 'Response end' to match the
> parsing introduced in Wireshark's MR !1922 for consistency.

Thanks for catching this, this is an obvious error on my part. In fact, I'd go as far as saying that in the commit where this was defined, b0df0c16 (stateless-connect: send response end packet, 2020-05-19), I erroneously called it a "Message Packet" when I meant to type "Response End Packet", which you are now correcting.

Show 20 quoted lines
> [1] kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/technical/protocol-v2.html
> [2] gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/1922
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joey Salazar <jgsal@protonmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt b/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
> index e597b74da39..6c55d566d8b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/protocol-v2.txt
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ In protocol v2 these special packets will have the following semantics:
> 
>    * '0000' Flush Packet (flush-pkt) - indicates the end of a message
>    * '0001' Delimiter Packet (delim-pkt) - separates sections of a message
> -  * '0002' Message Packet (response-end-pkt) - indicates the end of a response
> -    for stateless connections
> +  * '0002' Response end Packet (response_end-pkt) - indicates the end of a
> +    response for stateless connections

A couple of aesthetic details: I see that these changes are based on MR !1922 so if you decide to take these suggestions, you'll probably need to apply them there too.

	1. It'd probably read better as "Response End Packet" (with the
	   "e" capitalised)
	2. The mix of underscore and hyphen in response_end-pkt is a
	   little odd, although I see that you've done it to make it
	   match the surrounding code[3].

I think that I'd prefer if 1. is taken and 2. can be ignored. But with or without those changes, consider this patch

	Acked-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>

Thanks, Denton

[3]: https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/1922#note_502316230
Show 5 quoted lines
>  Initial Client Request
>  ----------------------
> --
> 2.29.0.rc2
> 
Joey Salazar· Feb 17, 2021, 23:59 UTC · re: Denton Liu · lore

Re: [OUTREACHY][PATCH v1] doc: fix naming of response-end-pkt

Hi Denton,
On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:07 AM, Denton Liu wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Hi Joey,
>
> A couple of aesthetic details: I see that these changes are based on MR
> !1922 so if you decide to take these suggestions, you'll probably need
> to apply them there too.
>
> 1. It'd probably read better as "Response End Packet" (with the
> "e" capitalised)
>
> 2. The mix of underscore and hyphen in response_end-pkt is a
> little odd, although I see that you've done it to make it
> match the surrounding code[3].
Well noted, I'll follow up shortly with PATCH v2 to incorporate both changes.

Thank you, Joey

← back to recent threads