# [ANNOUNCE] Git Rev News edition 69

3 messages from 2020-11-27 to 2020-11-28. Participants: Christian Couder, Felipe Contreras.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/54725

## Christian Couder, 2020-11-27 21:14

Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Git Rev News edition 69
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD0xoqVh=1BweBqNOt4_9xg4GvDd7Jf5f5_5z4H+PCVt8g@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAP8UFD0xoqVh%3D1BweBqNOt4_9xg4GvDd7Jf5f5_5z4H%2BPCVt8g%40mail.gmail.com

```
Hi everyone,

The 69th edition of Git Rev News is now published:

  https://git.github.io/rev_news/2020/11/27/edition-69/

Thanks a lot to Philippe Blain, Semyon Kirnosenko, Tarun Batra, Philip
Oakley and Luca Milanesio who helped this month!

Enjoy,
Christian, Jakub, Markus and Kaartic.

PS: An issue for the next edition is already opened and contributions
are welcome:

https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/468

```

## Felipe Contreras, 2020-11-28 08:27

Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git Rev News edition 69
Message-ID: <CAMP44s28HEUUvW8hs5PxrW5NwwDdpou-qsNm8nx3kMk_g0brNw@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAMP44s28HEUUvW8hs5PxrW5NwwDdpou-qsNm8nx3kMk_g0brNw%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD0xoqVh=1BweBqNOt4_9xg4GvDd7Jf5f5_5z4H+PCVt8g@mail.gmail.com>

```
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:24 PM Christian Couder
<christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> The 69th edition of Git Rev News is now published:
>
>   https://git.github.io/rev_news/2020/11/27/edition-69/

A nit-pick that has bothered me for years...

The font seems to be the same as git-scm.com, which is horrendous [1]
in Linux. The style was clearly developed by people in the Git
teaching industrial complex, who use macOS, not Linux.

The font-family list is Adelle, Georgia, Times New Roman. None of
which are present in Linux systems (and the first one costs $540 USD).
Then it falls back to "serif", which is already the default. So
basically on Linux there is no font. It has the same font as "<p>Hello
world<p>".

I was told in university that the best fonts to read on screens are
sans-serif (Arial), and in paper serif (Times New Roman). Which is why
the first thing I do in an HTML page is to add a style: body {
font-family: sans-serif; }. But somehow nobody in this lucrative
industry managed to do s/\<serif\>/sans-serif/ for Linux users.

Anyway, enough ranting.

After investigating all the different fonts specified in the list
(present in macOS and Windows), I sent a fix [2] to pick similar fonts
for Linux. The best one is Roboto Slab [3], which looks very similar
to Adelle, and it's free. Alternatively, DejaVu Serif [4] is a good
second option present in many (most?) Linux systems, plus it's how it
looks on Windows with Georgia. And lastly, plain old (but not 90s old)
sans-serif [5].

And now it finally looks readable to me.

Cheers.

[1] https://i.imgur.com/IGwT40T.png
[2] https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/470
[3] https://i.imgur.com/iD4rTv8.png
[4] https://i.imgur.com/hVu3VNS.png
[5] https://i.imgur.com/7KXVsQa.png

-- 
Felipe Contreras

```

## Christian Couder, 2020-11-28 08:40

Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git Rev News edition 69
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD32sjT_nttQrxknr=4EYUQLMebg=KhdGmMJ7j+YUmTjwg@mail.gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/CAP8UFD32sjT_nttQrxknr%3D4EYUQLMebg%3DKhdGmMJ7j%2BYUmTjwg%40mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s28HEUUvW8hs5PxrW5NwwDdpou-qsNm8nx3kMk_g0brNw@mail.gmail.com>

```
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 9:27 AM Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:

> A nit-pick that has bothered me for years...
>
> The font seems to be the same as git-scm.com, which is horrendous [1]
> in Linux.

I agree that the fonts haven't looked great to me either.

> After investigating all the different fonts specified in the list
> (present in macOS and Windows), I sent a fix [2] to pick similar fonts
> for Linux.

Thanks for your pull request! I hope we can merge it soon.

> The best one is Roboto Slab [3], which looks very similar
> to Adelle, and it's free. Alternatively, DejaVu Serif [4] is a good
> second option present in many (most?) Linux systems, plus it's how it
> looks on Windows with Georgia. And lastly, plain old (but not 90s old)
> sans-serif [5].

Thanks for the screenshots too. Yeah, it seems that the fonts you
suggest look better.

Best,
Christian.

```
