threads / bug / 54417

[BUG?] Weird interaction between `git -C`, aliases and worktrees

Subject: [BUG?] Weird interaction between `git -C`, aliases and worktrees

## tl;dr

4 messages between Oct 14, 2020 and Oct 16, 2020.

replies: 3people: 3as markdown or json

Philippe Blain· Oct 14, 2020, 15:27 UTC · lore
Hello all,

Up to recently I had an alias 'st' for `git status`, i.e. `git config alias.st status`. This works well in the main working tree as well as secondary worktrees (`git worktree add ...`), and also shows paths relative to the current directory if I'm not at the root of the repo, just like `git status`.

Now I wanted to change my alias so that it ran `git status` and then an additional command, i.e. `git config alias.st '!git status && date'` (for demonstration purposes). This works correctly in the main worktree and secondary worktrees, but since aliases run from the root of the repo, the paths in the output of 'git st' are not relative to the current directory.

So my next attempt was `git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" status && date'`, so that paths would be relative in the output. However, this works in the main worktree but fails badly in the secondary worktree:

``` rm -rf test && rm -rf test2 && git init test && cd test && mkdir folder && date>>folder/file && git add folder/file && git ci -m "commit" && git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" status && date' && date >>folder/file && echo '=== `git st` in main worktree at root ===' && git st && cd folder && echo '=== `git st` in main worktree in folder ===' && git st && git worktree add ../test2 && cd ../test2 && date >>folder/file && echo '=== `git st` in secondary worktree at root ===' && git st && cd folder && echo '=== `git st` in secondary worktree in folder ===' && git st ```

The last commands ouputs: 
```
=== `git st` in secondary worktree in folder ===
On branch test2
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
	deleted:    folder/file
Untracked files:
  (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
	file

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") ```

So something is wrong in the automatic worktree path detection... If I replace the alias with

    git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" --work-tree=$PWD status && date' 
then it works correctly, but I have a feeling this should not be necessary...

I've CC-ed Eric (because of his work on `git worktree`) and Elijah (because I remember he worked on `dir.c` so maybe this is related to that code, but I'm not sure).

Cheers, Philippe

Elijah Newren· Oct 14, 2020, 22:02 UTC · re: Philippe Blain · lore

Re: [BUG?] Weird interaction between `git -C`, aliases and worktrees

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:27 AM Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 74 quoted lines
>
> Hello all,
>
> Up to recently I had an alias 'st' for `git status`, i.e. `git config alias.st status`.
> This works well in the main working tree as well as secondary worktrees (`git worktree add ...`),
> and also shows paths relative to the current directory if I'm not at the root of the repo,
> just like `git status`.
>
> Now I wanted to change my alias so that it ran `git status` and then an additional command, i.e.
> `git config alias.st '!git status && date'` (for demonstration purposes).
> This works correctly in the main worktree and secondary worktrees, but since aliases
> run from the root of the repo, the paths in the output of 'git st' are not relative
> to the current directory.
>
> So my next attempt was `git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" status && date'`,
> so that paths would be relative in the output. However, this works in the main worktree
> but fails badly in the secondary worktree:
>
> ```
> rm -rf test &&
> rm -rf test2 &&
> git init test &&
> cd test &&
> mkdir folder &&
> date>>folder/file &&
> git add folder/file &&
> git ci -m "commit" &&
> git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" status && date' &&
> date >>folder/file &&
> echo '=== `git st` in main worktree at root ===' &&
> git st &&
> cd folder &&
> echo '=== `git st` in main worktree in folder ===' &&
> git st &&
> git worktree add ../test2 &&
> cd ../test2 &&
> date >>folder/file &&
> echo '=== `git st` in secondary worktree at root ===' &&
> git st &&
> cd folder &&
> echo '=== `git st` in secondary worktree in folder ===' &&
> git st
> ```
>
> The last commands ouputs:
>
> ```
> === `git st` in secondary worktree in folder ===
> On branch test2
> Changes not staged for commit:
>   (use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
>   (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
>         deleted:    folder/file
>
> Untracked files:
>   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>         file
>
> no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
> ```
>
> So something is wrong in the automatic worktree path detection...
> If I replace the alias with
>
>     git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" --work-tree=$PWD status && date'
>
> then it works correctly, but I have a feeling this should not be necessary...
>
> I've CC-ed Eric (because of his work on `git worktree`) and Elijah (because
> I remember he worked on `dir.c` so maybe this is related to that code, but I'm
> not sure).
>
> Cheers,
> Philippe

I don't think there's anything dir.c-specific here (thank goodness...). I extended your aliases slightly to echo the command they would run (so I could see the value of $GIT_PREFIX) as well as to print all the GIT_* environment variables, and found that GIT_DIR was set as well as GIT_PREFIX, so you can duplicate the funny results with

GIT_DIR=$WHEREVER git -C folder status
or even
git --git-dir=$WHEREVER -C folder status

In fact, you don't need any special worktrees setup; using these commands will trigger the funny status output. Looking at the documentation for core.worktree, I see

"If --git-dir or GIT_DIR is specified but none of --work-tree, GIT_WORK_TREE and core.worktree is specified, the current working directory is regarded as the top level of your working tree."

and indeed, I find that if I run from the toplevel:
git --work-tree=folder/ status

then I see the same output that you are complaining about. So, it seems that "the current working directory is regarded as the top level of your working tree" is implemented to take effect AFTER the "-C folder" first changes the current working directory.

I haven't tracked down where in the code this happens, but I suspect that this is what is happening and is the culprit behind the behavior you are seeing. If I am right, it doesn't answer whether this is a bug, of course -- it could be that this ordering is intentional and desired, or it could be that this ordering is not wanted. Anyway, does this help you track it down?

Philippe Blain· Oct 14, 2020, 22:35 UTC · re: Elijah Newren · lore

Re: [BUG?] Weird interaction between `git -C`, aliases and worktrees

Hi Elijah,
Show 98 quoted lines
> Le 14 oct. 2020 à 18:02, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:27 AM Philippe Blain
> <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> Up to recently I had an alias 'st' for `git status`, i.e. `git config alias.st status`.
>> This works well in the main working tree as well as secondary worktrees (`git worktree add ...`),
>> and also shows paths relative to the current directory if I'm not at the root of the repo,
>> just like `git status`.
>> 
>> Now I wanted to change my alias so that it ran `git status` and then an additional command, i.e.
>> `git config alias.st '!git status && date'` (for demonstration purposes).
>> This works correctly in the main worktree and secondary worktrees, but since aliases
>> run from the root of the repo, the paths in the output of 'git st' are not relative
>> to the current directory.
>> 
>> So my next attempt was `git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" status && date'`,
>> so that paths would be relative in the output. However, this works in the main worktree
>> but fails badly in the secondary worktree:
>> 
>> ```
>> rm -rf test &&
>> rm -rf test2 &&
>> git init test &&
>> cd test &&
>> mkdir folder &&
>> date>>folder/file &&
>> git add folder/file &&
>> git ci -m "commit" &&
>> git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" status && date' &&
>> date >>folder/file &&
>> echo '=== `git st` in main worktree at root ===' &&
>> git st &&
>> cd folder &&
>> echo '=== `git st` in main worktree in folder ===' &&
>> git st &&
>> git worktree add ../test2 &&
>> cd ../test2 &&
>> date >>folder/file &&
>> echo '=== `git st` in secondary worktree at root ===' &&
>> git st &&
>> cd folder &&
>> echo '=== `git st` in secondary worktree in folder ===' &&
>> git st
>> ```
>> 
>> The last commands ouputs:
>> 
>> ```
>> === `git st` in secondary worktree in folder ===
>> On branch test2
>> Changes not staged for commit:
>>  (use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
>>  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
>>        deleted:    folder/file
>> 
>> Untracked files:
>>  (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>>        file
>> 
>> no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
>> ```
>> 
>> So something is wrong in the automatic worktree path detection...
>> If I replace the alias with
>> 
>>    git config alias.st '!git -C "${GIT_PREFIX}" --work-tree=$PWD status && date'
>> 
>> then it works correctly, but I have a feeling this should not be necessary...
>> 
>> I've CC-ed Eric (because of his work on `git worktree`) and Elijah (because
>> I remember he worked on `dir.c` so maybe this is related to that code, but I'm
>> not sure).
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Philippe
> 
> I don't think there's anything dir.c-specific here (thank
> goodness...).  I extended your aliases slightly to echo the command
> they would run (so I could see the value of $GIT_PREFIX) as well as to
> print all the GIT_* environment variables, and found that GIT_DIR was
> set as well as GIT_PREFIX, so you can duplicate the funny results with
> 
> GIT_DIR=$WHEREVER git -C folder status
> 
> or even
> 
> git --git-dir=$WHEREVER -C folder status
> 
> In fact, you don't need any special worktrees setup; using these
> commands will trigger the funny status output.  Looking at the
> documentation for core.worktree, I see
> 
> "If --git-dir or GIT_DIR is specified but none of --work-tree,
> GIT_WORK_TREE and core.worktree is specified, the current working
> directory is regarded as the top level of your working tree."
Yes, this is in line with git(1) [1] :
"Specifying the location of the ".git" directory using this option (or GIT_DIR environment variable)
 turns off the repository discovery that tries to find a directory with ".git" subdirectory
(which is how the repository and the top-level of the working tree are discovered), 
and tells Git that you are at the top level of the working tree. 
If you are not at the top-level directory of the working tree,
 you should tell Git where the top-level of the working tree is, 
with the --work-tree=<path> option (or GIT_WORK_TREE environment variable)"
Show 15 quoted lines
> and indeed, I find that if I run from the toplevel:
> 
> git --work-tree=folder/ status
> 
> then I see the same output that you are complaining about.  So, it
> seems that "the current working directory is regarded as the top level
> of your working tree" is implemented to take effect AFTER the "-C
> folder" first changes the current working directory.
> 
> I haven't tracked down where in the code this happens, but I suspect
> that this is what is happening and is the culprit behind the behavior
> you are seeing.  If I am right, it doesn't answer whether this is a
> bug, of course -- it could be that this ordering is intentional and
> desired, or it could be that this ordering is not wanted.  Anyway,
> does this help you track it down?
I found two threads [2] and [3] which are manifestations of similar (or the same ?) problems...

Maybe git-config(1) could document which variables will be set in aliases that shell out, but even that might be tricky because it seems the answer is "it depends" (according to [2])...

I also found 57ea7123c8 (git.c: make sure we do not leak GIT_* to alias scripts, 2015-12-20), in topic 'nd/clear-gitenv-upon-use-of-alias', which tries to clear out GIT_* variables from aliases environment, which I guess is defeated by the fact that I run `git -C` in my alias...

Anyway thanks for your answer.

[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git#Documentation/git.txt---git-dirltpathgt [2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200130102933.GE840531@coredump.intra.peff.net/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200228190218.GC1408759@coredump.intra.peff.net/

Philippe.
Jeff King· Oct 16, 2020, 00:23 UTC · re: Philippe Blain · lore

Re: [BUG?] Weird interaction between `git -C`, aliases and worktrees

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 06:35:39PM -0400, Philippe Blain wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> I found two threads [2] and [3] which are manifestations of similar (or the same ?) problems...
> 
> Maybe git-config(1) could document which variables will 
> be set in aliases that shell out, but even that might be tricky because it
> seems the answer is "it depends" (according to [2])...
> 
> I also found 57ea7123c8 (git.c: make sure we do not 
> leak GIT_* to alias scripts, 2015-12-20), in topic 'nd/clear-gitenv-upon-use-of-alias',
> which tries to clear out GIT_* variables from aliases environment,
> which I guess is defeated by the fact that I run `git -C` in my alias...
> 
> Anyway thanks for your answer.
> 
> [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git#Documentation/git.txt---git-dirltpathgt
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200130102933.GE840531@coredump.intra.peff.net/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200228190218.GC1408759@coredump.intra.peff.net/

IMHO it is still worth doing a fix similar to what I wrote earlier. But somebody needs to figure out what's up with the failure in t5601:

 - whether it's a behavior that has to be kept, or if it's something we can
   deprecate or just publicly warn about
 - if kept, can we work around it internally within git-clone /
   git-init? If not, can we work around it with an extra environment
   variable?

I probably won't look at it anytime soon, but I'd be happy if somebody else did. :)

-Peff

← back to recent threads