Re: [PATCH] send-email: restore --in-reply-to superseding behavior
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 02:33:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > git send-email --in-reply-to= fails to override the email headers,
> > if they're present in the output of format-patch, which breakes the
>
> Will do s/breakes/breaks/ while applying.
>
UGH! I've been fat-fingering typos the whole day, today... Sorry about that one.
Show 24 quoted lines
> It makes me wonder, however, why it is a good idea to have the I-R-T
> in the format patch output in the first place.
>
> > elsif (/^In-Reply-To: (.*)/i) {
> > - $in_reply_to = $1;
> > + if (!$initial_in_reply_to) {
> > + $in_reply_to = $1;
> > + }
>
> I can see how this would work the way it should for the first
> message we send out, so it would work well for a single patch.
>
> But what does this change do to the chaining (either making [PATCH
> 1/N] thru [PATCH N/N] as responses to the cover letter [PATCH 0/N],
> or making [PATCH n+1/N] as response to [PATCH n/N] for 1 <= n < N)
> of multiple messages?
>
> When you prepare a series whose 1..N/N are all pointing at 0/N with
> the already prepared In-Reply-To (so you have N+1 files to send
> out), wouldn't you want to make 0/N a reply to a particular message
> you specify on the command line, while keeping the relationship
> among your messages intact? Doesn't having $initial_in_reply_to
> (i.e. command line override) help above code break the chaning?
>This change will make all emails to appear as a reply to the msgid fed to --in-reply-to. I see your point, though, and at its light I think now this patch, is actually incomplete.
With this change we get back the override desired behavior, but it also breaks the contract, according to the man page.
"
--in-reply-to=<identifier>
Make the first mail (or all the mails with --no-thread) appear as a reply to the given Message-Id, which
avoids breaking threads to provide a new patch series. The second and subsequent emails will be sent as
replies according to the --[no-]chain-reply-to setting.
"I drove the change based on my usecase, which is marginal to the multi-part reply case.
I guess we just need the following, for a complete solution:
Show changes to git-send-email.perl +6 −2
diff --git a/git-send-email.perl b/git-send-email.perl
index dc95656f75..768296ea0a 100755
--- a/git-send-email.perl
+++ b/git-send-email.perl
@@ -1699,10 +1699,14 @@ sub process_file {
$xfer_encoding = $1 if not defined $xfer_encoding;
}
elsif (/^In-Reply-To: (.*)/i) {
- $in_reply_to = $1;
+ if (!$initial_in_reply_to || $thread) {
+ $in_reply_to = $1;
+ }
}
elsif (/^References: (.*)/i) {
- $references = $1;
+ if (!$initial_in_reply_to || $thread) {
+ $references = $1;
+ }
}
elsif (!/^Date:\s/i && /^[-A-Za-z]+:\s+\S/) {
push @xh, $_;
Rafael Aquini
