threads / patch / 52294

v2userdiff: support Python async functions

Subject: [PATCH v2] userdiff: support Python async functions

## tl;dr

3 messages between Nov 19, 2019 and Nov 20, 2019. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 2people: 3as markdown or json

Josh Holland· Nov 19, 2019, 15:08 UTC · lore

Python's async functions (declared with "async def" rather than "def") were not being displayed in hunk headers. This commit teaches git about the async function syntax, and adds tests for the Python userdiff regex.

Signed-off-by: Josh Holland <anowlcalledjosh@gmail.com>
---
This patch now includes tests for indented declarations, as well as the
unindented versions which were present before. Apologies for the delay
in preparing this patch.
 t/t4018/python-async-def          | 4 ++++
 t/t4018/python-class              | 4 ++++
 t/t4018/python-def                | 4 ++++
 t/t4018/python-indented-async-def | 7 +++++++
 t/t4018/python-indented-class     | 5 +++++
 t/t4018/python-indented-def       | 7 +++++++
 userdiff.c                        | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 t/t4018/python-async-def
 create mode 100644 t/t4018/python-class
 create mode 100644 t/t4018/python-def
 create mode 100644 t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
 create mode 100644 t/t4018/python-indented-class
 create mode 100644 t/t4018/python-indented-def
Show changes to 7 files +32 −1

t/t4018/python-async-def, t/t4018/python-class, t/t4018/python-def, t/t4018/python-indented-async-def, t/t4018/python-indented-class, t/t4018/python-indented-def, userdiff.c

diff --git a/t/t4018/python-async-def b/t/t4018/python-async-def
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..87640e03d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4018/python-async-def
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+async def RIGHT(pi: int = 3.14):
+    while True:
+        break
+    return ChangeMe()
diff --git a/t/t4018/python-class b/t/t4018/python-class
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ba9e74143
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4018/python-class
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+class RIGHT(int, str):
+    # comment
+    # another comment
+    # ChangeMe
diff --git a/t/t4018/python-def b/t/t4018/python-def
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e50b31b0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4018/python-def
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+def RIGHT(pi: int = 3.14):
+    while True:
+        break
+    return ChangeMe()
diff --git a/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f5d03258a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+class Foo:
+    async def RIGHT(self, x: int):
+        return [
+            1,
+            2,
+            ChangeMe,
+        ]
diff --git a/t/t4018/python-indented-class b/t/t4018/python-indented-class
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..19b4f35c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4018/python-indented-class
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    class RIGHT:
+        # comment
+        # another comment
+        # ChangeMe
diff --git a/t/t4018/python-indented-def b/t/t4018/python-indented-def
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..208fbadd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4018/python-indented-def
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+class Foo:
+    def RIGHT(self, x: int):
+        return [
+            1,
+            2,
+            ChangeMe,
+        ]
diff --git a/userdiff.c b/userdiff.c
index e187d356f..3fd324e61 100644
--- a/userdiff.c
+++ b/userdiff.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ PATTERNS("php",
 	 "[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*"
 	 "|[-+0-9.e]+|0[xXbB]?[0-9a-fA-F]+"
 	 "|[-+*/<>%&^|=!.]=|--|\\+\\+|<<=?|>>=?|===|&&|\\|\\||::|->"),
-PATTERNS("python", "^[ \t]*((class|def)[ \t].*)$",
+PATTERNS("python", "^[ \t]*((class|(async[ \t]+)?def)[ \t].*)$",
 	 /* -- */
 	 "[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*"
 	 "|[-+0-9.e]+[jJlL]?|0[xX]?[0-9a-fA-F]+[lL]?"
-- 
2.24.0
Junio C Hamano· Nov 20, 2019, 03:59 UTC · re: Josh Holland · lore

Re: [PATCH v2] userdiff: support Python async functions

Josh Holland <anowlcalledjosh@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch now includes tests for indented declarations, as well as the
> unindented versions which were present before.
Very much appreciated.
I wondered if something like
Show changes to t/t4018/python-indented-async-def +3 −0
diff --git a/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
index f5d03258af..567c1dafcb 100644
--- a/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
+++ b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+async def not_this_one(self):
+    return []
+
 class Foo:
     async def RIGHT(self, x: int):
         return [

would further help, but if a breakage makes us ignore a start of
definition that is indented, we would hit "class Foo:" you added
and notice such a breakage anyway, without additional definition
before it.  So I think what we see in this patch is good.

Thanks.

> ...
>  t/t4018/python-indented-async-def | 7 +++++++
> ...
> diff --git a/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..f5d03258a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +class Foo:
> +    async def RIGHT(self, x: int):
> +        return [
> +            1,
> +            2,
> +            ChangeMe,
> +        ]
> ...
Johannes Sixt· Nov 20, 2019, 06:48 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCH v2] userdiff: support Python async functions

Am 20.11.19 um 04:59 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Show 25 quoted lines
> Josh Holland <anowlcalledjosh@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> This patch now includes tests for indented declarations, as well as the
>> unindented versions which were present before.
> 
> Very much appreciated.
> 
> I wondered if something like
> 
> diff --git a/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
> index f5d03258af..567c1dafcb 100644
> --- a/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
> +++ b/t/t4018/python-indented-async-def
> @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
> +async def not_this_one(self):
> +    return []
> +
>  class Foo:
>      async def RIGHT(self, x: int):
>          return [
> 
> would further help, but if a breakage makes us ignore a start of
> definition that is indented, we would hit "class Foo:" you added
> and notice such a breakage anyway, without additional definition
> before it.  So I think what we see in this patch is good.
Good point raised and fine analysis!
This patch is
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
-- Hannes

← back to recent threads