threads / discuss / 51857

Git diff|status against remote repo

Subject: Git diff|status against remote repo

## tl;dr

3 messages between Sep 16, 2019 and Sep 16, 2019.

replies: 2people: 2as markdown or json

Stefanie Leisestreichler· Sep 16, 2019, 09:02 UTC · lore
Hi.

I am far from being a pro in git. There is something I do not understand.

This is my git config:
[core]
         repositoryformatversion = 0
         filemode = true
         bare = false
         logallrefupdates = true
[remote "origin"]
         url = ssh://git@192.168.2.2:/home/git/PROJECT.git
         fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
[branch "master"]
         remote = origin
         merge = refs/heads/master
[branch "develop"]
         remote = origin
         merge = refs/heads/develop
I have a local repo called "develop" also on each involved dev machine.

Developer A has made changes on nearly each file of the project by changing the namespace and locally commited those changes to his local branch "develop". After that he did a git push.

On a not involved machine M I did a git clone ssh://git@192.168.2.2:/home/git/PROJECT.git and after that I did a "git checkout develop" which was followed by a message like "Branch develop is following remote branch develop from origin". I can see all the changes Developer A has made.

On my machine DEV I am on my local branch develop. Since I did not pull or merge from origin already, I am not able to see any of those changes developer A has made. So far so good. But I would expect, that git status (which results in "On branch develop. Your branch is up to date with origin/develop) or "git diff origin/develop develop" or "git diff origin/develop...develop" (both no output at all) would give me a hint that I am x commits behind origin/master or (git diff) will show me the changes Developer A committed to the Repro. But nothing...

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks, Steffi

Pratyush Yadav· Sep 16, 2019, 10:45 UTC · re: Stefanie Leisestreichler · lore

Re: Git diff|status against remote repo

On 16/09/19 11:02AM, Stefanie Leisestreichler wrote:
Show 43 quoted lines
> Hi.
> 
> I am far from being a pro in git.
> There is something I do not understand.
> 
> This is my git config:
> [core]
>         repositoryformatversion = 0
>         filemode = true
>         bare = false
>         logallrefupdates = true
> [remote "origin"]
>         url = ssh://git@192.168.2.2:/home/git/PROJECT.git
>         fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
> [branch "master"]
>         remote = origin
>         merge = refs/heads/master
> [branch "develop"]
>         remote = origin
>         merge = refs/heads/develop
> 
> I have a local repo called "develop" also on each involved dev machine.
> 
> Developer A has made changes on nearly each file of the project by changing
> the namespace and locally commited those changes to his local branch
> "develop". After that he did a git push.
> 
> On a not involved machine M I did a git clone
> ssh://git@192.168.2.2:/home/git/PROJECT.git and after that I did a "git
> checkout develop" which was followed by a message like "Branch develop is
> following remote branch develop from origin". I can see all the changes
> Developer A has made.
> 
> On my machine DEV I am on my local branch develop. Since I did not pull or
> merge from origin already, I am not able to see any of those changes
> developer A has made. So far so good. But I would expect, that git status
> (which results in "On branch develop. Your branch is up to date with
> origin/develop) or "git diff origin/develop develop" or "git diff
> origin/develop...develop" (both no output at all) would give me a hint that
> I am x commits behind origin/master or (git diff) will show me the changes
> Developer A committed to the Repro. But nothing...
> 
> What am I doing wrong?

You haven't gotten the new commits from origin, so your local repo can't know how ahead/behind it is from its remote version.

Run `git fetch origin`.

Now if you run `git status`, it should show you that you are X commits behind origin.

`git pull` does two things: `git fetch` and `git merge`. fetch "downloads" all the commits from remote, and merge then puts them in your local branch. So if you do a `git pull`, developer A's changes are now merged into your tree. But if you only do a fetch, origin/master gets updated, but not your local master. So now status can know how far you are behind, but your local branch is not changed yet.

Once you are ready to finally get those changes in your local branch, run `git merge origin/master`.

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Stefanie Leisestreichler· Sep 16, 2019, 11:31 UTC · re: Pratyush Yadav · lore

Re: Git diff|status against remote repo

Am 16.09.19 um 12:45 schrieb Pratyush Yadav:
Show 63 quoted lines
> On 16/09/19 11:02AM, Stefanie Leisestreichler wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I am far from being a pro in git.
>> There is something I do not understand.
>>
>> This is my git config:
>> [core]
>>          repositoryformatversion = 0
>>          filemode = true
>>          bare = false
>>          logallrefupdates = true
>> [remote "origin"]
>>          url = ssh://git@192.168.2.2:/home/git/PROJECT.git
>>          fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>> [branch "master"]
>>          remote = origin
>>          merge = refs/heads/master
>> [branch "develop"]
>>          remote = origin
>>          merge = refs/heads/develop
>>
>> I have a local repo called "develop" also on each involved dev machine.
>>
>> Developer A has made changes on nearly each file of the project by changing
>> the namespace and locally commited those changes to his local branch
>> "develop". After that he did a git push.
>>
>> On a not involved machine M I did a git clone
>> ssh://git@192.168.2.2:/home/git/PROJECT.git and after that I did a "git
>> checkout develop" which was followed by a message like "Branch develop is
>> following remote branch develop from origin". I can see all the changes
>> Developer A has made.
>>
>> On my machine DEV I am on my local branch develop. Since I did not pull or
>> merge from origin already, I am not able to see any of those changes
>> developer A has made. So far so good. But I would expect, that git status
>> (which results in "On branch develop. Your branch is up to date with
>> origin/develop) or "git diff origin/develop develop" or "git diff
>> origin/develop...develop" (both no output at all) would give me a hint that
>> I am x commits behind origin/master or (git diff) will show me the changes
>> Developer A committed to the Repro. But nothing...
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
> 
> You haven't gotten the new commits from origin, so your local repo can't
> know how ahead/behind it is from its remote version.
> 
> Run `git fetch origin`.
> 
> Now if you run `git status`, it should show you that you are X commits
> behind origin.
> 
> `git pull` does two things: `git fetch` and `git merge`. fetch
> "downloads" all the commits from remote, and merge then puts them in
> your local branch. So if you do a `git pull`, developer A's changes are
> now merged into your tree. But if you only do a fetch, origin/master
> gets updated, but not your local master. So now status can know how far
> you are behind, but your local branch is not changed yet.
> 
> Once you are ready to finally get those changes in your local branch,
> run `git merge origin/master`.
> 
Thanks a lot. git fetch did the trick.

← back to recent threads