# did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean?

1 messages from 2019-03-06 to 2019-03-06. Participants: Robert P. J. Day.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/50671

## Robert P. J. Day, 2019-03-06 14:44

Subject: did we ever resolve what "known to Git" should mean?
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1903060940470.6367@localhost.localdomain>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/alpine.LFD.2.21.1903060940470.6367%40localhost.localdomain

```

  going back to a couple threads:

https://marc.info/?l=git&m=151048015116473&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152690160605723&w=2

and i'm going to try to clarify what (if anything) was decided
regarding the internally inconsistent phrase "known to Git." junio's
take on this here:

https://marc.info/?l=git&m=152695527902711&w=2

was to banish the phrase entirely in favour of some combination of
"tracked" and/or "added to the index."

  thoughts?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

```