I've tried to upload a patch twice but it doesn't seem to be showing up in my mailbox or in the mailing list archives. The patch title was "[RFC PATCH] evolve: Implement the git change command".
Has anyone seen it? Is there a reason the mailing list would reject a patch?
- Stefan
Re: Missing patch?
Stefan Xenos <sxenos@google.com> wrote:
> I've tried to upload a patch twice but it doesn't seem to be showing > up in my mailbox or in the mailing list archives. The patch title was > "[RFC PATCH] evolve: Implement the git change command". > > Has anyone seen it? Is there a reason the mailing list would reject a patch?
Who was on the Cc: list (if anyone)? Any other info, particularly the date/time of the patch.
Was it huge? vger rejects giant mails.
Any bounces? (perhaps in your spam box).
I noticed I didn't get too many messages from vger yesterday, so maybe it was down for a bit and still going through a backlog (or people were just enjoying the weekend).
I've been hacking on public-inbox lately so I checked to see if I accidentally deleted it, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Re: Missing patch?
I'm guessing the patch was just too big. I'll break it up and submit it in bits.
- Stefan
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:21 PM Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
> > Stefan Xenos <sxenos@google.com> wrote: > > I've tried to upload a patch twice but it doesn't seem to be showing > > up in my mailbox or in the mailing list archives. The patch title was > > "[RFC PATCH] evolve: Implement the git change command". > > > > Has anyone seen it? Is there a reason the mailing list would reject a patch? > > Who was on the Cc: list (if anyone)? Any other info, > particularly the date/time of the patch. > > Was it huge? vger rejects giant mails. > > Any bounces? (perhaps in your spam box). > > I noticed I didn't get too many messages from vger yesterday, > so maybe it was down for a bit and still going through a backlog > (or people were just enjoying the weekend). > > I've been hacking on public-inbox lately so I checked to see if > I accidentally deleted it, but that doesn't seem to be the case.