threads / discuss / 49915

[PATCHv2 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

Subject: [PATCHv2 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

## tl;dr

21 messages between Nov 29, 2018 and Feb 2, 2019.

replies: 20people: 5as markdown or json

Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · lore

This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip, with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it without range-diff, but would ask for full review.

I plan on resending after the next release as this got delayed quite a bit, which is why I also rebased it to master.

Thanks, Stefan

Previous round: https://public-inbox.org/git/20181016181327.107186-1-sbeller@google.com/

Stefan Beller (9):
  sha1-array: provide oid_array_filter
  submodule.c: fix indentation
  submodule.c: sort changed_submodule_names before searching it
  submodule.c: tighten scope of changed_submodule_names struct
  submodule: store OIDs in changed_submodule_names
  repository: repo_submodule_init to take a submodule struct
  submodule: migrate get_next_submodule to use repository structs
  submodule.c: fetch in submodules git directory instead of in worktree
  fetch: try fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched
 Documentation/technical/api-oid-array.txt    |   5 +
 builtin/fetch.c                              |  11 +-
 builtin/grep.c                               |  17 +-
 builtin/ls-files.c                           |  12 +-
 builtin/submodule--helper.c                  |   2 +-
 repository.c                                 |  27 +-
 repository.h                                 |  12 +-
 sha1-array.c                                 |  17 ++
 sha1-array.h                                 |   3 +
 submodule.c                                  | 284 ++++++++++++++++---
 t/helper/test-submodule-nested-repo-config.c |   8 +-
 t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh                  |  86 ++++++
 12 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 1/9] sha1-array: provide oid_array_filter

Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 Documentation/technical/api-oid-array.txt |  5 +++++
 sha1-array.c                              | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 sha1-array.h                              |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-oid-array.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-oid-array.txt
index 9febfb1d52..c97428c2c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/technical/api-oid-array.txt
+++ b/Documentation/technical/api-oid-array.txt
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ Functions
 	is not sorted, this function has the side effect of sorting
 	it.
 
+`oid_array_filter`::
+	Apply the callback function `want` to each entry in the array,
+	retaining only the entries for which the function returns true.
+	Preserve the order of the entries that are retained.
+
 Examples
 --------
 
diff --git a/sha1-array.c b/sha1-array.c
index b94e0ec0f5..d922e94e3f 100644
--- a/sha1-array.c
+++ b/sha1-array.c
@@ -77,3 +77,20 @@ int oid_array_for_each_unique(struct oid_array *array,
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+
+void oid_array_filter(struct oid_array *array,
+		      for_each_oid_fn want,
+		      void *cb_data)
+{
+	unsigned nr = array->nr, src, dst;
+	struct object_id *oids = array->oid;
+
+	for (src = dst = 0; src < nr; src++) {
+		if (want(&oids[src], cb_data)) {
+			if (src != dst)
+				oidcpy(&oids[dst], &oids[src]);
+			dst++;
+		}
+	}
+	array->nr = dst;
+}
diff --git a/sha1-array.h b/sha1-array.h
index 232bf95017..55d016c4bf 100644
--- a/sha1-array.h
+++ b/sha1-array.h
@@ -22,5 +22,8 @@ int oid_array_for_each(struct oid_array *array,
 int oid_array_for_each_unique(struct oid_array *array,
 			      for_each_oid_fn fn,
 			      void *data);
+void oid_array_filter(struct oid_array *array,
+		      for_each_oid_fn want,
+		      void *cbdata);
 
 #endif /* SHA1_ARRAY_H */
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 2/9] submodule.c: fix indentation

The submodule subsystem is really bad at staying within 80 characters. Fix it while we are here.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 submodule.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index 6415cc5580..bc48ea3b68 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1271,7 +1271,8 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 		if (!submodule) {
 			const char *name = default_name_or_path(ce->name);
 			if (name) {
-				default_submodule.path = default_submodule.name = name;
+				default_submodule.path = name;
+				default_submodule.name = name;
 				submodule = &default_submodule;
 			}
 		}
@@ -1281,8 +1282,10 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 		default:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
-			if (!submodule || !unsorted_string_list_lookup(&changed_submodule_names,
-							 submodule->name))
+			if (!submodule ||
+			    !unsorted_string_list_lookup(
+					&changed_submodule_names,
+					submodule->name))
 				continue;
 			default_argv = "on-demand";
 			break;
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 3/9] submodule.c: sort changed_submodule_names before searching it

We can string_list_insert() to maintain sorted-ness of the list as we find new items, or we can string_list_append() to build an unsorted list and sort it at the end just once.

As we do not rely on the sortedness while building the list, we pick the "append and sort at the end" as it has better worst case execution times.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 submodule.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index bc48ea3b68..3c388f85cc 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
 			if (!submodule ||
-			    !unsorted_string_list_lookup(
+			    !string_list_lookup(
 					&changed_submodule_names,
 					submodule->name))
 				continue;
@@ -1377,6 +1377,7 @@ int fetch_populated_submodules(struct repository *r,
 	/* default value, "--submodule-prefix" and its value are added later */
 
 	calculate_changed_submodule_paths(r);
+	string_list_sort(&changed_submodule_names);
 	run_processes_parallel(max_parallel_jobs,
 			       get_next_submodule,
 			       fetch_start_failure,
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Jonathan Tan· Dec 5, 2018, 00:12 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCH 3/9] submodule.c: sort changed_submodule_names before searching it

Show 7 quoted lines
> We can string_list_insert() to maintain sorted-ness of the
> list as we find new items, or we can string_list_append() to
> build an unsorted list and sort it at the end just once.
> 
> As we do not rely on the sortedness while building the
> list, we pick the "append and sort at the end" as it
> has better worst case execution times.
I would write this entire commit message as:
  Instead of using unsorted_string_list_lookup(), sort
  changed_submodule_names before performing any lookups so that we can
  use the faster string_list_lookup() instead.
The code in this patch is fine, and patches 1-2 are fine too.
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 4/9] submodule.c: tighten scope of changed_submodule_names struct

The `changed_submodule_names` are only used for fetching, so let's make it part of the struct that is passed around for fetching submodules.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 submodule.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index 3c388f85cc..f93f0aff82 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include "commit-reach.h"
 
 static int config_update_recurse_submodules = RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF;
-static struct string_list changed_submodule_names = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
 static int initialized_fetch_ref_tips;
 static struct oid_array ref_tips_before_fetch;
 static struct oid_array ref_tips_after_fetch;
@@ -1136,7 +1135,8 @@ void check_for_new_submodule_commits(struct object_id *oid)
 	oid_array_append(&ref_tips_after_fetch, oid);
 }
 
-static void calculate_changed_submodule_paths(struct repository *r)
+static void calculate_changed_submodule_paths(struct repository *r,
+		struct string_list *changed_submodule_names)
 {
 	struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
 	struct string_list changed_submodules = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
@@ -1174,7 +1174,8 @@ static void calculate_changed_submodule_paths(struct repository *r)
 			continue;
 
 		if (!submodule_has_commits(r, path, commits))
-			string_list_append(&changed_submodule_names, name->string);
+			string_list_append(changed_submodule_names,
+					   name->string);
 	}
 
 	free_submodules_oids(&changed_submodules);
@@ -1221,8 +1222,10 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
 	int default_option;
 	int quiet;
 	int result;
+
+	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
 };
-#define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0}
+#define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP }
 
 static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
 				    struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf)
@@ -1284,7 +1287,7 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
 			if (!submodule ||
 			    !string_list_lookup(
-					&changed_submodule_names,
+					&spf->changed_submodule_names,
 					submodule->name))
 				continue;
 			default_argv = "on-demand";
@@ -1376,8 +1379,8 @@ int fetch_populated_submodules(struct repository *r,
 	argv_array_push(&spf.args, "--recurse-submodules-default");
 	/* default value, "--submodule-prefix" and its value are added later */
 
-	calculate_changed_submodule_paths(r);
-	string_list_sort(&changed_submodule_names);
+	calculate_changed_submodule_paths(r, &spf.changed_submodule_names);
+	string_list_sort(&spf.changed_submodule_names);
 	run_processes_parallel(max_parallel_jobs,
 			       get_next_submodule,
 			       fetch_start_failure,
@@ -1386,7 +1389,7 @@ int fetch_populated_submodules(struct repository *r,
 
 	argv_array_clear(&spf.args);
 out:
-	string_list_clear(&changed_submodule_names, 1);
+	string_list_clear(&spf.changed_submodule_names, 1);
 	return spf.result;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 5/9] submodule: store OIDs in changed_submodule_names

'calculate_changed_submodule_paths' uses a local list to compute the changed submodules, and then produces the result by copying appropriate items into the result list.

Instead use the result list directly and prune items afterwards using string_list_remove_empty_items.

By doing so we'll have access to the util pointer for longer that contains the commits that we need to fetch, which will be useful in a later patch.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
---
 submodule.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index f93f0aff82..0c81aca6f2 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1139,8 +1139,7 @@ static void calculate_changed_submodule_paths(struct repository *r,
 		struct string_list *changed_submodule_names)
 {
 	struct argv_array argv = ARGV_ARRAY_INIT;
-	struct string_list changed_submodules = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
-	const struct string_list_item *name;
+	struct string_list_item *name;
 
 	/* No need to check if there are no submodules configured */
 	if (!submodule_from_path(r, NULL, NULL))
@@ -1157,9 +1156,9 @@ static void calculate_changed_submodule_paths(struct repository *r,
 	 * Collect all submodules (whether checked out or not) for which new
 	 * commits have been recorded upstream in "changed_submodule_names".
 	 */
-	collect_changed_submodules(r, &changed_submodules, &argv);
+	collect_changed_submodules(r, changed_submodule_names, &argv);
 
-	for_each_string_list_item(name, &changed_submodules) {
+	for_each_string_list_item(name, changed_submodule_names) {
 		struct oid_array *commits = name->util;
 		const struct submodule *submodule;
 		const char *path = NULL;
@@ -1173,12 +1172,14 @@ static void calculate_changed_submodule_paths(struct repository *r,
 		if (!path)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!submodule_has_commits(r, path, commits))
-			string_list_append(changed_submodule_names,
-					   name->string);
+		if (submodule_has_commits(r, path, commits)) {
+			oid_array_clear(commits);
+			*name->string = '\0';
+		}
 	}
 
-	free_submodules_oids(&changed_submodules);
+	string_list_remove_empty_items(changed_submodule_names, 1);
+
 	argv_array_clear(&argv);
 	oid_array_clear(&ref_tips_before_fetch);
 	oid_array_clear(&ref_tips_after_fetch);
@@ -1389,7 +1390,7 @@ int fetch_populated_submodules(struct repository *r,
 
 	argv_array_clear(&spf.args);
 out:
-	string_list_clear(&spf.changed_submodule_names, 1);
+	free_submodules_oids(&spf.changed_submodule_names);
 	return spf.result;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 6/9] repository: repo_submodule_init to take a submodule struct

When constructing a struct repository for a submodule for some revision of the superproject where the submodule is not contained in the index, it may not be present in the working tree currently either. In that situation giving a 'path' argument is not useful. Upgrade the repo_submodule_init function to take a struct submodule instead. The submodule struct can be obtained via submodule_from_{path, name} or an artificial submodule struct can be passed in.

While we are at it, rename the repository struct in the repo_submodule_init function, which is to be initialized, to a name that is not confused with the struct submodule as easily. Perform such renames in similar functions as well.

Also move its documentation into the header file.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 builtin/grep.c                               | 17 +++++++-----
 builtin/ls-files.c                           | 12 +++++----
 builtin/submodule--helper.c                  |  2 +-
 repository.c                                 | 27 ++++++++------------
 repository.h                                 | 12 +++++++--
 t/helper/test-submodule-nested-repo-config.c |  8 +++---
 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/grep.c b/builtin/grep.c
index 71df52a333..d6bd887b2d 100644
--- a/builtin/grep.c
+++ b/builtin/grep.c
@@ -404,7 +404,10 @@ static int grep_submodule(struct grep_opt *opt, struct repository *superproject,
 			  const struct object_id *oid,
 			  const char *filename, const char *path)
 {
-	struct repository submodule;
+	struct repository subrepo;
+	const struct submodule *sub = submodule_from_path(superproject,
+							  &null_oid, path);
+
 	int hit;
 
 	/*
@@ -420,12 +423,12 @@ static int grep_submodule(struct grep_opt *opt, struct repository *superproject,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (repo_submodule_init(&submodule, superproject, path)) {
+	if (repo_submodule_init(&subrepo, superproject, sub)) {
 		grep_read_unlock();
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	repo_read_gitmodules(&submodule);
+	repo_read_gitmodules(&subrepo);
 
 	/*
 	 * NEEDSWORK: This adds the submodule's object directory to the list of
@@ -437,7 +440,7 @@ static int grep_submodule(struct grep_opt *opt, struct repository *superproject,
 	 * store is no longer global and instead is a member of the repository
 	 * object.
 	 */
-	add_to_alternates_memory(submodule.objects->objectdir);
+	add_to_alternates_memory(subrepo.objects->objectdir);
 	grep_read_unlock();
 
 	if (oid) {
@@ -462,14 +465,14 @@ static int grep_submodule(struct grep_opt *opt, struct repository *superproject,
 
 		init_tree_desc(&tree, data, size);
 		hit = grep_tree(opt, pathspec, &tree, &base, base.len,
-				object->type == OBJ_COMMIT, &submodule);
+				object->type == OBJ_COMMIT, &subrepo);
 		strbuf_release(&base);
 		free(data);
 	} else {
-		hit = grep_cache(opt, &submodule, pathspec, 1);
+		hit = grep_cache(opt, &subrepo, pathspec, 1);
 	}
 
-	repo_clear(&submodule);
+	repo_clear(&subrepo);
 	return hit;
 }
 
diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
index c70a9c7158..583a0e1ca2 100644
--- a/builtin/ls-files.c
+++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
@@ -206,17 +206,19 @@ static void show_files(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir);
 static void show_submodule(struct repository *superproject,
 			   struct dir_struct *dir, const char *path)
 {
-	struct repository submodule;
+	struct repository subrepo;
+	const struct submodule *sub = submodule_from_path(superproject,
+							  &null_oid, path);
 
-	if (repo_submodule_init(&submodule, superproject, path))
+	if (repo_submodule_init(&subrepo, superproject, sub))
 		return;
 
-	if (repo_read_index(&submodule) < 0)
+	if (repo_read_index(&subrepo) < 0)
 		die("index file corrupt");
 
-	show_files(&submodule, dir);
+	show_files(&subrepo, dir);
 
-	repo_clear(&submodule);
+	repo_clear(&subrepo);
 }
 
 static void show_ce(struct repository *repo, struct dir_struct *dir,
diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
index d38113a31a..4eceb8f040 100644
--- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
+++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ static int ensure_core_worktree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 	if (!sub)
 		BUG("We could get the submodule handle before?");
 
-	if (repo_submodule_init(&subrepo, the_repository, path))
+	if (repo_submodule_init(&subrepo, the_repository, sub))
 		die(_("could not get a repository handle for submodule '%s'"), path);
 
 	if (!repo_config_get_string(&subrepo, "core.worktree", &cw)) {
diff --git a/repository.c b/repository.c
index 5dd1486718..aabe64ee5d 100644
--- a/repository.c
+++ b/repository.c
@@ -166,30 +166,23 @@ int repo_init(struct repository *repo,
 	return -1;
 }
 
-/*
- * Initialize 'submodule' as the submodule given by 'path' in parent repository
- * 'superproject'.
- * Return 0 upon success and a non-zero value upon failure.
- */
-int repo_submodule_init(struct repository *submodule,
+int repo_submodule_init(struct repository *subrepo,
 			struct repository *superproject,
-			const char *path)
+			const struct submodule *sub)
 {
-	const struct submodule *sub;
 	struct strbuf gitdir = STRBUF_INIT;
 	struct strbuf worktree = STRBUF_INIT;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	sub = submodule_from_path(superproject, &null_oid, path);
 	if (!sub) {
 		ret = -1;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&gitdir, superproject, "%s/.git", path);
-	strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&worktree, superproject, "%s", path);
+	strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&gitdir, superproject, "%s/.git", sub->path);
+	strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&worktree, superproject, "%s", sub->path);
 
-	if (repo_init(submodule, gitdir.buf, worktree.buf)) {
+	if (repo_init(subrepo, gitdir.buf, worktree.buf)) {
 		/*
 		 * If initilization fails then it may be due to the submodule
 		 * not being populated in the superproject's worktree.  Instead
@@ -201,16 +194,16 @@ int repo_submodule_init(struct repository *submodule,
 		strbuf_repo_git_path(&gitdir, superproject,
 				     "modules/%s", sub->name);
 
-		if (repo_init(submodule, gitdir.buf, NULL)) {
+		if (repo_init(subrepo, gitdir.buf, NULL)) {
 			ret = -1;
 			goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
-	submodule->submodule_prefix = xstrfmt("%s%s/",
-					      superproject->submodule_prefix ?
-					      superproject->submodule_prefix :
-					      "", path);
+	subrepo->submodule_prefix = xstrfmt("%s%s/",
+					    superproject->submodule_prefix ?
+					    superproject->submodule_prefix :
+					    "", sub->path);
 
 out:
 	strbuf_release(&gitdir);
diff --git a/repository.h b/repository.h
index 9f16c42c1e..0e482b7d49 100644
--- a/repository.h
+++ b/repository.h
@@ -116,9 +116,17 @@ void repo_set_worktree(struct repository *repo, const char *path);
 void repo_set_hash_algo(struct repository *repo, int algo);
 void initialize_the_repository(void);
 int repo_init(struct repository *r, const char *gitdir, const char *worktree);
-int repo_submodule_init(struct repository *submodule,
+
+/*
+ * Initialize the repository 'subrepo' as the submodule given by the
+ * struct submodule 'sub' in parent repository 'superproject'.
+ * Return 0 upon success and a non-zero value upon failure, which may happen
+ * if the submodule is not found, or 'sub' is NULL.
+ */
+struct submodule;
+int repo_submodule_init(struct repository *subrepo,
 			struct repository *superproject,
-			const char *path);
+			const struct submodule *sub);
 void repo_clear(struct repository *repo);
 
 /*
diff --git a/t/helper/test-submodule-nested-repo-config.c b/t/helper/test-submodule-nested-repo-config.c
index a31e2a9bea..bc97929bbc 100644
--- a/t/helper/test-submodule-nested-repo-config.c
+++ b/t/helper/test-submodule-nested-repo-config.c
@@ -10,19 +10,21 @@ static void die_usage(int argc, const char **argv, const char *msg)
 
 int cmd__submodule_nested_repo_config(int argc, const char **argv)
 {
-	struct repository submodule;
+	struct repository subrepo;
+	const struct submodule *sub;
 
 	if (argc < 3)
 		die_usage(argc, argv, "Wrong number of arguments.");
 
 	setup_git_directory();
 
-	if (repo_submodule_init(&submodule, the_repository, argv[1])) {
+	sub = submodule_from_path(the_repository, &null_oid, argv[1]);
+	if (repo_submodule_init(&subrepo, the_repository, sub)) {
 		die_usage(argc, argv, "Submodule not found.");
 	}
 
 	/* Read the config of _child_ submodules. */
-	print_config_from_gitmodules(&submodule, argv[2]);
+	print_config_from_gitmodules(&subrepo, argv[2]);
 
 	submodule_free(the_repository);
 
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 7/9] submodule: migrate get_next_submodule to use repository structs

We used to recurse into submodules, even if they were broken having only an objects directory. The child process executed in the submodule would fail though if the submodule was broken. This is tested via "fetching submodule into a broken repository" in t5526.

This patch tightens the check upfront, such that we do not need to spawn a child process to find out if the submodule is broken.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 submodule.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index 0c81aca6f2..77ace5e784 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1253,6 +1253,30 @@ static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
 	return spf->default_option;
 }
 
+static struct repository *get_submodule_repo_for(struct repository *r,
+						 const struct submodule *sub)
+{
+	struct repository *ret = xmalloc(sizeof(*ret));
+
+	if (repo_submodule_init(ret, r, sub)) {
+		/*
+		 * No entry in .gitmodules? Technically not a submodule,
+		 * but historically we supported repositories that happen to be
+		 * in-place where a gitlink is. Keep supporting them.
+		 */
+		struct strbuf gitdir = STRBUF_INIT;
+		strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&gitdir, r, "%s/.git", sub->path);
+		if (repo_init(ret, gitdir.buf, NULL)) {
+			strbuf_release(&gitdir);
+			free(ret);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+		strbuf_release(&gitdir);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			      struct strbuf *err, void *data, void **task_cb)
 {
@@ -1260,12 +1284,11 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = data;
 
 	for (; spf->count < spf->r->index->cache_nr; spf->count++) {
-		struct strbuf submodule_path = STRBUF_INIT;
-		struct strbuf submodule_git_dir = STRBUF_INIT;
 		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
 		const struct cache_entry *ce = spf->r->index->cache[spf->count];
-		const char *git_dir, *default_argv;
+		const char *default_argv;
 		const struct submodule *submodule;
+		struct repository *repo;
 		struct submodule default_submodule = SUBMODULE_INIT;
 
 		if (!S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))
@@ -1300,15 +1323,11 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&submodule_path, spf->r, "%s", ce->name);
-		strbuf_addf(&submodule_git_dir, "%s/.git", submodule_path.buf);
 		strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/", spf->prefix, ce->name);
-		git_dir = read_gitfile(submodule_git_dir.buf);
-		if (!git_dir)
-			git_dir = submodule_git_dir.buf;
-		if (is_directory(git_dir)) {
+		repo = get_submodule_repo_for(spf->r, submodule);
+		if (repo) {
 			child_process_init(cp);
-			cp->dir = strbuf_detach(&submodule_path, NULL);
+			cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->worktree);
 			prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array);
 			cp->git_cmd = 1;
 			if (!spf->quiet)
@@ -1319,10 +1338,23 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, default_argv);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
+
+			repo_clear(repo);
+			free(repo);
 			ret = 1;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * An empty directory is normal,
+			 * the submodule is not initialized
+			 */
+			if (S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode) &&
+			    !is_empty_dir(ce->name)) {
+				spf->result = 1;
+				strbuf_addf(err,
+					    _("Could not access submodule '%s'"),
+					    ce->name);
+			}
 		}
-		strbuf_release(&submodule_path);
-		strbuf_release(&submodule_git_dir);
 		strbuf_release(&submodule_prefix);
 		if (ret) {
 			spf->count++;
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Jonathan Tan· Dec 5, 2018, 00:17 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCH 7/9] submodule: migrate get_next_submodule to use repository structs

Show 7 quoted lines
> We used to recurse into submodules, even if they were broken having
> only an objects directory. The child process executed in the submodule
> would fail though if the submodule was broken. This is tested via
> "fetching submodule into a broken repository" in t5526.
> 
> This patch tightens the check upfront, such that we do not need
> to spawn a child process to find out if the submodule is broken.

Thanks, patches 4-7 look good to me - I see that you have addressed all my comments. Not sending one email each for patches 4, 5, and 6 - although I have commented on all of them, my comments were minor.

My more in-depth review was done on a previous version [1], and I see that my comments have been addressed. Also, Stefan says [2] (and implements in this patch):

Show 12 quoted lines
> > > If the working tree directory is empty for that submodule, it means
> > > it is likely not initialized. But why would we use that as a signal to
> > > skip the submodule?
> >
> > What I meant was: if empty, skip it completely. Otherwise, do the
> > repo_submodule_init() and repo_init() thing, and if they both fail, set
> > spf->result to 1, preserving existing behavior.
> 
> I did it the other way round:
> 
> If repo_[submodule_]init fails, see if we have a gitlink in tree and
> an empty dir in the FS, to decide if we need to signal failure.
This works too.

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20181017225811.66554-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGZ79kbNXD35ZwevjLZcrGsT=2hNcUPmVUWvP1RjsKSH0Gd3ww@mail.gmail.com/

Jonathan Nieder· Feb 2, 2019, 01:58 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCH 7/9] submodule: migrate get_next_submodule to use repository structs

Hi,
Stefan Beller wrote:
> This patch tightens the check upfront, such that we do not need
> to spawn a child process to find out if the submodule is broken.
Sounds sensible.
[...]
> --- a/submodule.c
> +++ b/submodule.c
[...]
Show 15 quoted lines
> @@ -1319,10 +1338,23 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
>  			argv_array_push(&cp->args, default_argv);
>  			argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
>  			argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
> +
> +			repo_clear(repo);
> +			free(repo);
>  			ret = 1;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * An empty directory is normal,
> +			 * the submodule is not initialized
> +			 */
> +			if (S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode) &&
> +			    !is_empty_dir(ce->name)) {
What if the directory is nonempty (e.g. contains build artifacts)?
Show 5 quoted lines
> +				spf->result = 1;
> +				strbuf_addf(err,
> +					    _("Could not access submodule '%s'"),
> +					    ce->name);
> +			}

Should this exit the loop? Otherwise, multiple "Could not access" messages can go in the same err string a big concatenated line.

Thanks, Jonathan

Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 8/9] submodule.c: fetch in submodules git directory instead of in worktree

Keep the properties introduced in 10f5c52656 (submodule: avoid auto-discovery in prepare_submodule_repo_env(), 2016-09-01), by fixating the git directory of the submodule.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 submodule.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index 77ace5e784..d1b6646f42 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -494,6 +494,12 @@ void prepare_submodule_repo_env(struct argv_array *out)
 			 DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
 }
 
+static void prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(struct argv_array *out)
+{
+	prepare_submodule_repo_env_no_git_dir(out);
+	argv_array_pushf(out, "%s=.", GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
+}
+
 /* Helper function to display the submodule header line prior to the full
  * summary output. If it can locate the submodule objects directory it will
  * attempt to lookup both the left and right commits and put them into the
@@ -1327,8 +1333,8 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 		repo = get_submodule_repo_for(spf->r, submodule);
 		if (repo) {
 			child_process_init(cp);
-			cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->worktree);
-			prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array);
+			cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->gitdir);
+			prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(&cp->env_array);
 			cp->git_cmd = 1;
 			if (!spf->quiet)
 				strbuf_addf(err, "Fetching submodule %s%s\n",
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Jonathan Tan· Dec 5, 2018, 00:38 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCH 8/9] submodule.c: fetch in submodules git directory instead of in worktree

> Keep the properties introduced in 10f5c52656 (submodule: avoid
> auto-discovery in prepare_submodule_repo_env(), 2016-09-01), by fixating
> the git directory of the submodule.

This is to avoid the autodetection of the Git repository, making it less error-prone; looks good to me.

Stefan Beller· Nov 29, 2018, 00:27 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

[PATCH 9/9] fetch: try fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched

Currently when git-fetch is asked to recurse into submodules, it dispatches a plain "git-fetch -C <submodule-dir>" (with some submodule related options such as prefix and recusing strategy, but) without any information of the remote or the tip that should be fetched.

But this default fetch is not sufficient, as a newly fetched commit in the superproject could point to a commit in the submodule that is not in the default refspec. This is common in workflows like Gerrit's. When fetching a Gerrit change under review (from refs/changes/??), the commits in that change likely point to submodule commits that have not been merged to a branch yet.

Try fetching a submodule by object id if the object id that the superproject points to, cannot be found.

builtin/fetch used to only inspect submodules when they were fetched "on-demand", as in either on/off case it was clear whether the submodule needs to be fetched. However to know whether we need to try fetching the object ids, we need to identify the object names, which is done in this function check_for_new_submodule_commits(), so we'll also run that code in case the submodule recursion is set to "on".

The submodule checks were done only when a ref in the superproject changed, these checks were extended to also be performed when fetching into FETCH_HEAD for completeness, and add a test for that too.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---
 builtin/fetch.c             |  11 +-
 submodule.c                 | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh |  86 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
index e0140327aa..91f9b7d9c8 100644
--- a/builtin/fetch.c
+++ b/builtin/fetch.c
@@ -763,9 +763,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
 			what = _("[new ref]");
 		}
 
-		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
-		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
-			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
 		r = s_update_ref(msg, ref, 0);
 		format_display(display, r ? '!' : '*', what,
 			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : NULL,
@@ -779,9 +776,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &current->object.oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
 		strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "..");
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &ref->new_oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
-		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
-		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
-			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
 		r = s_update_ref("fast-forward", ref, 1);
 		format_display(display, r ? '!' : ' ', quickref.buf,
 			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : NULL,
@@ -794,9 +788,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &current->object.oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
 		strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "...");
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &ref->new_oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
-		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
-		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
-			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
 		r = s_update_ref("forced-update", ref, 1);
 		format_display(display, r ? '!' : '+', quickref.buf,
 			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : _("forced update"),
@@ -892,6 +883,8 @@ static int store_updated_refs(const char *raw_url, const char *remote_name,
 				ref->force = rm->peer_ref->force;
 			}
 
+			if (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF)
+				check_for_new_submodule_commits(&rm->old_oid);
 
 			if (!strcmp(rm->name, "HEAD")) {
 				kind = "";
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index d1b6646f42..1ce944a737 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1231,8 +1231,14 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
 	int result;
 
 	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
+
+	/* The submodules to fetch in */
+	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;
+	int oid_fetch_tasks_nr, oid_fetch_tasks_alloc;
 };
-#define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP }
+#define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, \
+		  STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, \
+		  NULL, 0, 0}
 
 static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
 				    struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf)
@@ -1259,6 +1265,73 @@ static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
 	return spf->default_option;
 }
 
+struct fetch_task {
+	struct repository *repo;
+	const struct submodule *sub;
+	unsigned free_sub : 1; /* Do we need to free the submodule? */
+
+	/* fetch specific oids if set, otherwise fetch default refspec */
+	struct oid_array *commits;
+};
+
+/**
+ * When a submodule is not defined in .gitmodules, we cannot access it
+ * via the regular submodule-config. Create a fake submodule, which we can
+ * work on.
+ */
+static const struct submodule *get_non_gitmodules_submodule(const char *path)
+{
+	struct submodule *ret = NULL;
+	const char *name = default_name_or_path(path);
+
+	if (!name)
+		return NULL;
+
+	ret = xmalloc(sizeof(*ret));
+	memset(ret, 0, sizeof(*ret));
+	ret->path = name;
+	ret->name = name;
+
+	return (const struct submodule *) ret;
+}
+
+static struct fetch_task *fetch_task_create(struct repository *r,
+					    const char *path)
+{
+	struct fetch_task *task = xmalloc(sizeof(*task));
+	memset(task, 0, sizeof(*task));
+
+	task->sub = submodule_from_path(r, &null_oid, path);
+	if (!task->sub) {
+		/*
+		 * No entry in .gitmodules? Technically not a submodule,
+		 * but historically we supported repositories that happen to be
+		 * in-place where a gitlink is. Keep supporting them.
+		 */
+		task->sub = get_non_gitmodules_submodule(path);
+		if (!task->sub) {
+			free(task);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
+		task->free_sub = 1;
+	}
+
+	return task;
+}
+
+static void fetch_task_release(struct fetch_task *p)
+{
+	if (p->free_sub)
+		free((void*)p->sub);
+	p->free_sub = 0;
+	p->sub = NULL;
+
+	if (p->repo)
+		repo_clear(p->repo);
+	FREE_AND_NULL(p->repo);
+}
+
 static struct repository *get_submodule_repo_for(struct repository *r,
 						 const struct submodule *sub)
 {
@@ -1286,39 +1359,32 @@ static struct repository *get_submodule_repo_for(struct repository *r,
 static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			      struct strbuf *err, void *data, void **task_cb)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = data;
 
 	for (; spf->count < spf->r->index->cache_nr; spf->count++) {
-		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
+		int recurse_config;
 		const struct cache_entry *ce = spf->r->index->cache[spf->count];
 		const char *default_argv;
-		const struct submodule *submodule;
-		struct repository *repo;
-		struct submodule default_submodule = SUBMODULE_INIT;
+		struct fetch_task *task;
 
 		if (!S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))
 			continue;
 
-		submodule = submodule_from_path(spf->r, &null_oid, ce->name);
-		if (!submodule) {
-			const char *name = default_name_or_path(ce->name);
-			if (name) {
-				default_submodule.path = name;
-				default_submodule.name = name;
-				submodule = &default_submodule;
-			}
-		}
+		task = fetch_task_create(spf->r, ce->name);
+		if (!task)
+			continue;
+
+		recurse_config = get_fetch_recurse_config(task->sub, spf);
 
-		switch (get_fetch_recurse_config(submodule, spf))
+		switch (recurse_config)
 		{
 		default:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
-			if (!submodule ||
+			if (!task->sub ||
 			    !string_list_lookup(
 					&spf->changed_submodule_names,
-					submodule->name))
+					task->sub->name))
 				continue;
 			default_argv = "on-demand";
 			break;
@@ -1329,11 +1395,11 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/", spf->prefix, ce->name);
-		repo = get_submodule_repo_for(spf->r, submodule);
-		if (repo) {
+		task->repo = get_submodule_repo_for(spf->r, task->sub);
+		if (task->repo) {
+			struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
 			child_process_init(cp);
-			cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->gitdir);
+			cp->dir = task->repo->gitdir;
 			prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(&cp->env_array);
 			cp->git_cmd = 1;
 			if (!spf->quiet)
@@ -1343,12 +1409,22 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			argv_array_pushv(&cp->args, spf->args.argv);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, default_argv);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
+
+			strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/",
+						       spf->prefix,
+						       task->sub->path);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
 
-			repo_clear(repo);
-			free(repo);
-			ret = 1;
+			spf->count++;
+			*task_cb = task;
+
+			strbuf_release(&submodule_prefix);
+			return 1;
 		} else {
+
+			fetch_task_release(task);
+			free(task);
+
 			/*
 			 * An empty directory is normal,
 			 * the submodule is not initialized
@@ -1361,12 +1437,38 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 					    ce->name);
 			}
 		}
+	}
+
+	if (spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr) {
+		struct fetch_task *task =
+			spf->oid_fetch_tasks[spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr - 1];
+		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
+		spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr--;
+
+		strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/",
+			    spf->prefix, task->sub->path);
+
+		child_process_init(cp);
+		prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(&cp->env_array);
+		cp->git_cmd = 1;
+		cp->dir = task->repo->gitdir;
+
+		argv_array_init(&cp->args);
+		argv_array_pushv(&cp->args, spf->args.argv);
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "on-demand");
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
+
+		/* NEEDSWORK: have get_default_remote from submodule--helper */
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "origin");
+		oid_array_for_each_unique(task->commits,
+					  append_oid_to_argv, &cp->args);
+
+		*task_cb = task;
 		strbuf_release(&submodule_prefix);
-		if (ret) {
-			spf->count++;
-			return 1;
-		}
+		return 1;
 	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1374,20 +1476,66 @@ static int fetch_start_failure(struct strbuf *err,
 			       void *cb, void *task_cb)
 {
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = cb;
+	struct fetch_task *task = task_cb;
 
 	spf->result = 1;
 
+	fetch_task_release(task);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int commit_exists_in_sub(const struct object_id *oid, void *data)
+{
+	struct repository *subrepo = data;
+
+	enum object_type type = oid_object_info(subrepo, oid, NULL);
+
+	return type != OBJ_COMMIT;
+}
+
 static int fetch_finish(int retvalue, struct strbuf *err,
 			void *cb, void *task_cb)
 {
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = cb;
+	struct fetch_task *task = task_cb;
+
+	struct string_list_item *it;
+	struct oid_array *commits;
 
 	if (retvalue)
 		spf->result = 1;
 
+	if (!task || !task->sub)
+		BUG("callback cookie bogus");
+
+	/* Is this the second time we process this submodule? */
+	if (task->commits)
+		return 0;
+
+	it = string_list_lookup(&spf->changed_submodule_names, task->sub->name);
+	if (!it)
+		/* Could be an unchanged submodule, not contained in the list */
+		goto out;
+
+	commits = it->util;
+	oid_array_filter(commits,
+			 commit_exists_in_sub,
+			 task->repo);
+
+	/* Are there commits we want, but do not exist? */
+	if (commits->nr) {
+		task->commits = commits;
+		ALLOC_GROW(spf->oid_fetch_tasks,
+			   spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr + 1,
+			   spf->oid_fetch_tasks_alloc);
+		spf->oid_fetch_tasks[spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr] = task;
+		spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr++;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+out:
+	fetch_task_release(task);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
index 6c2f9b2ba2..8a016272bc 100755
--- a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
+++ b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
@@ -600,4 +600,90 @@ test_expect_success "fetch new commits when submodule got renamed" '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success "fetch new submodule commits on-demand outside standard refspec" '
+	# add a second submodule and ensure it is around in downstream first
+	git clone submodule sub1 &&
+	git submodule add ./sub1 &&
+	git commit -m "adding a second submodule" &&
+	git -C downstream pull &&
+	git -C downstream submodule update --init --recursive &&
+
+	git checkout --detach &&
+
+	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "new change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/1 $C &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
+	test_tick &&
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "new change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/2 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/3 $E &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/3:refs/heads/my_branch &&
+		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commits on-demand in FETCH_HEAD' '
+	# depends on the previous test for setup
+
+	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/4 $C &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
+	test_tick &&
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/5 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/6 $E &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/6 &&
+		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commits on-demand without .gitmodules entry' '
+	# depends on the previous test for setup
+
+	git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.sub1 &&
+	git add .gitmodules &&
+	git commit -m "delete gitmodules file" &&
+	git checkout -B master &&
+	git -C downstream fetch &&
+	git -C downstream checkout origin/master &&
+
+	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "yet another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/7 $C &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
+	test_tick &&
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "yet another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/8 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/9 $E &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/9 &&
+		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Jonathan Tan· Dec 5, 2018, 01:07 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCH 9/9] fetch: try fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched

> Try fetching a submodule by object id if the object id that the
> superproject points to, cannot be found.
Mention here the consequences of what happens when this attempt to fetch
fails. Also, this seems to be a case of "do or do not, there is no try"
- maybe it's better to say "Fetch commits by ID from the submodule's
origin if the submodule doesn't already contain the commit that the
superproject references" (note that there is no "Try" word, since the
consequence is to fail the entire command).
Also mention that this fetch is always from the origin.
Show 10 quoted lines
> builtin/fetch used to only inspect submodules when they were fetched
> "on-demand", as in either on/off case it was clear whether the submodule
> needs to be fetched. However to know whether we need to try fetching the
> object ids, we need to identify the object names, which is done in this
> function check_for_new_submodule_commits(), so we'll also run that code
> in case the submodule recursion is set to "on".
> 
> The submodule checks were done only when a ref in the superproject
> changed, these checks were extended to also be performed when fetching
> into FETCH_HEAD for completeness, and add a test for that too.

"inspect submodules" and "submodule checks" are unnecessarily vague to me - might be better to just say "A list of new submodule commits are already generated in certain conditions (by check_for_new_submodule_commits()); this new feature invokes that function in more situations".

Show 32 quoted lines
> -		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
> -		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
> -			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
>  		r = s_update_ref(msg, ref, 0);
>  		format_display(display, r ? '!' : '*', what,
>  			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : NULL,
> @@ -779,9 +776,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
>  		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &current->object.oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
>  		strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "..");
>  		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &ref->new_oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
> -		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
> -		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
> -			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
>  		r = s_update_ref("fast-forward", ref, 1);
>  		format_display(display, r ? '!' : ' ', quickref.buf,
>  			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : NULL,
> @@ -794,9 +788,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
>  		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &current->object.oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
>  		strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "...");
>  		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &ref->new_oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
> -		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
> -		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
> -			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
>  		r = s_update_ref("forced-update", ref, 1);
>  		format_display(display, r ? '!' : '+', quickref.buf,
>  			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : _("forced update"),
> @@ -892,6 +883,8 @@ static int store_updated_refs(const char *raw_url, const char *remote_name,
>  				ref->force = rm->peer_ref->force;
>  			}
>  
> +			if (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF)
> +				check_for_new_submodule_commits(&rm->old_oid);

As discussed above, indeed, check_for_new_submodule_commits() is now invoked in more situations (not just when there is a local ref, and also when recurse_submodules is _ON).

Show 9 quoted lines
> @@ -1231,8 +1231,14 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
>  	int result;
>  
>  	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
> +
> +	/* The submodules to fetch in */
> +	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;
> +	int oid_fetch_tasks_nr, oid_fetch_tasks_alloc;
>  };

Better to document as "Pending fetches by OIDs", I think. (These are not fetches by default refspec, and are not already in progress.)

Show 8 quoted lines
> +struct fetch_task {
> +	struct repository *repo;
> +	const struct submodule *sub;
> +	unsigned free_sub : 1; /* Do we need to free the submodule? */
> +
> +	/* fetch specific oids if set, otherwise fetch default refspec */
> +	struct oid_array *commits;
> +};

I would document this as "Fetch in progress (if callback data) or pending (if in oid_fetch_tasks in struct submodule_parallel_fetch)". This potential confusion is why I wanted 2 separate types, as I wrote in [1].

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20181026204106.132296-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/
Show 6 quoted lines
> +/**
> + * When a submodule is not defined in .gitmodules, we cannot access it
> + * via the regular submodule-config. Create a fake submodule, which we can
> + * work on.
> + */
> +static const struct submodule *get_non_gitmodules_submodule(const char *path)
Thanks, this is a good explanation.
Show 9 quoted lines
>  static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
>  			      struct strbuf *err, void *data, void **task_cb)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
>  	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = data;
>  
>  	for (; spf->count < spf->r->index->cache_nr; spf->count++) {
> -		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
> +		int recurse_config;
Unnecessary local variable recurse_config, but that's not a big deal.

[snip the part where we use a heap-allocated task instead of a few variables on the stack]

Show 5 quoted lines
> -			repo_clear(repo);
> -			free(repo);
> -			ret = 1;
> +			spf->count++;
> +			*task_cb = task;

And here we see why we need the heap-allocated task - it needs to go into the callback data.

Show 33 quoted lines
> +	if (spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr) {
> +		struct fetch_task *task =
> +			spf->oid_fetch_tasks[spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr - 1];
> +		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
> +		spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr--;
> +
> +		strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/",
> +			    spf->prefix, task->sub->path);
> +
> +		child_process_init(cp);
> +		prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(&cp->env_array);
> +		cp->git_cmd = 1;
> +		cp->dir = task->repo->gitdir;
> +
> +		argv_array_init(&cp->args);
> +		argv_array_pushv(&cp->args, spf->args.argv);
> +		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "on-demand");
> +		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
> +		argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
> +
> +		/* NEEDSWORK: have get_default_remote from submodule--helper */
> +		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "origin");
> +		oid_array_for_each_unique(task->commits,
> +					  append_oid_to_argv, &cp->args);
> +
> +		*task_cb = task;
>  		strbuf_release(&submodule_prefix);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			spf->count++;
> -			return 1;
> -		}
> +		return 1;
>  	}

And if we ran out of submodules but have pending fetch-by-OID tasks, we execute them.

Show 8 quoted lines
> +static int commit_exists_in_sub(const struct object_id *oid, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct repository *subrepo = data;
> +
> +	enum object_type type = oid_object_info(subrepo, oid, NULL);
> +
> +	return type != OBJ_COMMIT;
> +}
Should be commit_missing_in_sub.
> +	/* Is this the second time we process this submodule? */
> +	if (task->commits)
> +		return 0;
Should be goto out, to clean up properly?
Show 30 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success "fetch new submodule commits on-demand outside standard refspec" '
> +	# add a second submodule and ensure it is around in downstream first
> +	git clone submodule sub1 &&
> +	git submodule add ./sub1 &&
> +	git commit -m "adding a second submodule" &&
> +	git -C downstream pull &&
> +	git -C downstream submodule update --init --recursive &&
> +
> +	git checkout --detach &&
> +
> +	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "new change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
> +	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/1 $C &&
> +	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
> +	test_tick &&
> +
> +	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "new change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
> +	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/2 $D &&
> +	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
> +
> +	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
> +	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
> +	git update-ref refs/changes/3 $E &&
> +	(
> +		cd downstream &&
> +		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/3:refs/heads/my_branch &&
> +		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
> +		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
> +		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
> +	)
> +'

It would be nicer if all these tests started from scratch (that is, an empty repository), but they are understandable - thanks.

In addition to the tests here, I would like a test that checks that submodule commits pointed to by interior superproject commits also work. For example:

  submodule:
  B   C
   \ /
    A
  superproject:
  current HEAD -> a commit -> the ref we're fetching
  gitlink=A       gitlink=B   gitlink=C

When fetching recursively in the superproject, we should make sure that both B and C are fetched in the submodule.

Stefan Beller· Dec 6, 2018, 21:26 UTC · re: Jonathan Tan · lore

[PATCH] fetch: ensure submodule objects fetched

Currently when git-fetch is asked to recurse into submodules, it dispatches a plain "git-fetch -C <submodule-dir>" (with some submodule related options such as prefix and recusing strategy, but) without any information of the remote or the tip that should be fetched.

But this default fetch is not sufficient, as a newly fetched commit in the superproject could point to a commit in the submodule that is not in the default refspec. This is common in workflows like Gerrit's. When fetching a Gerrit change under review (from refs/changes/??), the commits in that change likely point to submodule commits that have not been merged to a branch yet.

Fetch a submodule object by id if the object that the superproject points to, cannot be found. For now this object is fetched from the 'origin' remote as we defer getting the default remote to a later patch.

A list of new submodule commits are already generated in certain conditions (by check_for_new_submodule_commits()); this new feature invokes that function in more situations.

The submodule checks were done only when a ref in the superproject changed, these checks were extended to also be performed when fetching into FETCH_HEAD for completeness, and add a test for that too.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
---

Thanks Jonathan for the review! So it looks like only the last patch needs some improvements, which is why I'd only resend the last patch here. Also note the test with interious superproject commits.

All suggestions sounded sensible, addressing them all, here is a range-diff to the currently queued version:

Range-diff:
1:  04eb06607b ! 1:  ac6558cbc9 fetch: try fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched
    @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
     Author: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
     
    -    fetch: try fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched
    +    fetch: ensure submodule objects fetched
     
         Currently when git-fetch is asked to recurse into submodules, it dispatches
         a plain "git-fetch -C <submodule-dir>" (with some submodule related options
    @@ -14,22 +14,19 @@
         commits in that change likely point to submodule commits that have not
         been merged to a branch yet.
     
    -    Try fetching a submodule by object id if the object id that the
    -    superproject points to, cannot be found.
    +    Fetch a submodule object by id if the object that the superproject
    +    points to, cannot be found. For now this object is fetched from the
    +    'origin' remote as we defer getting the default remote to a later patch.
     
    -    builtin/fetch used to only inspect submodules when they were fetched
    -    "on-demand", as in either on/off case it was clear whether the submodule
    -    needs to be fetched. However to know whether we need to try fetching the
    -    object ids, we need to identify the object names, which is done in this
    -    function check_for_new_submodule_commits(), so we'll also run that code
    -    in case the submodule recursion is set to "on".
    +    A list of new submodule commits are already generated in certain
    +    conditions (by check_for_new_submodule_commits()); this new feature
    +    invokes that function in more situations.
     
         The submodule checks were done only when a ref in the superproject
         changed, these checks were extended to also be performed when fetching
         into FETCH_HEAD for completeness, and add a test for that too.
     
         Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
    -    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
     
      diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
      --- a/builtin/fetch.c
    @@ -82,7 +79,7 @@
      
      	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
     +
    -+	/* The submodules to fetch in */
    ++	/* Pending fetches by OIDs */
     +	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;
     +	int oid_fetch_tasks_nr, oid_fetch_tasks_alloc;
      };
    @@ -97,13 +94,16 @@
      	return spf->default_option;
      }
      
    ++/*
    ++ * Fetch in progress (if callback data) or
    ++ * pending (if in oid_fetch_tasks in struct submodule_parallel_fetch)
    ++ */
     +struct fetch_task {
     +	struct repository *repo;
     +	const struct submodule *sub;
     +	unsigned free_sub : 1; /* Do we need to free the submodule? */
     +
    -+	/* fetch specific oids if set, otherwise fetch default refspec */
    -+	struct oid_array *commits;
    ++	struct oid_array *commits; /* Ensure these commits are fetched */
     +};
     +
     +/**
    @@ -176,7 +176,6 @@
      
      	for (; spf->count < spf->r->index->cache_nr; spf->count++) {
     -		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
    -+		int recurse_config;
      		const struct cache_entry *ce = spf->r->index->cache[spf->count];
      		const char *default_argv;
     -		const struct submodule *submodule;
    @@ -199,11 +198,9 @@
     +		task = fetch_task_create(spf->r, ce->name);
     +		if (!task)
     +			continue;
    -+
    -+		recurse_config = get_fetch_recurse_config(task->sub, spf);
      
     -		switch (get_fetch_recurse_config(submodule, spf))
    -+		switch (recurse_config)
    ++		switch (get_fetch_recurse_config(task->sub, spf))
      		{
      		default:
      		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
    @@ -314,7 +311,7 @@
      	return 0;
      }
      
    -+static int commit_exists_in_sub(const struct object_id *oid, void *data)
    ++static int commit_missing_in_sub(const struct object_id *oid, void *data)
     +{
     +	struct repository *subrepo = data;
     +
    @@ -340,7 +337,7 @@
     +
     +	/* Is this the second time we process this submodule? */
     +	if (task->commits)
    -+		return 0;
    ++		goto out;
     +
     +	it = string_list_lookup(&spf->changed_submodule_names, task->sub->name);
     +	if (!it)
    @@ -349,7 +346,7 @@
     +
     +	commits = it->util;
     +	oid_array_filter(commits,
    -+			 commit_exists_in_sub,
    ++			 commit_missing_in_sub,
     +			 task->repo);
     +
     +	/* Are there commits we want, but do not exist? */
    @@ -408,7 +405,7 @@
     +	)
     +'
     +
    -+test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commits on-demand in FETCH_HEAD' '
    ++test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commit on-demand in FETCH_HEAD' '
     +	# depends on the previous test for setup
     +
     +	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
    @@ -462,5 +459,36 @@
     +		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
     +	)
     +'
    ++
    ++test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commit intermittently referenced by superproject' '
    ++	# depends on the previous test for setup
    ++
    ++	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "change 10 outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
    ++	E=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "change 11 outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
    ++	F=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "change 12 outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
    ++
    ++	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/10 $D &&
    ++	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
    ++	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
    ++
    ++	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/11 $E &&
    ++	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $E sub1 &&
    ++	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
    ++
    ++	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/12 $F &&
    ++	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $F sub1 &&
    ++	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
    ++
    ++	G=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
    ++	git update-ref refs/changes/13 $G &&
    ++	(
    ++		cd downstream &&
    ++		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/13 &&
    ++
    ++		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
    ++		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $E &&
    ++		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $F
    ++	)
    ++'
     +
      test_done
 builtin/fetch.c             |  11 +-
 submodule.c                 | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
index e0140327aa..91f9b7d9c8 100644
--- a/builtin/fetch.c
+++ b/builtin/fetch.c
@@ -763,9 +763,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
 			what = _("[new ref]");
 		}
 
-		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
-		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
-			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
 		r = s_update_ref(msg, ref, 0);
 		format_display(display, r ? '!' : '*', what,
 			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : NULL,
@@ -779,9 +776,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &current->object.oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
 		strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "..");
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &ref->new_oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
-		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
-		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
-			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
 		r = s_update_ref("fast-forward", ref, 1);
 		format_display(display, r ? '!' : ' ', quickref.buf,
 			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : NULL,
@@ -794,9 +788,6 @@ static int update_local_ref(struct ref *ref,
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &current->object.oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
 		strbuf_addstr(&quickref, "...");
 		strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&quickref, &ref->new_oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
-		if ((recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF) &&
-		    (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON))
-			check_for_new_submodule_commits(&ref->new_oid);
 		r = s_update_ref("forced-update", ref, 1);
 		format_display(display, r ? '!' : '+', quickref.buf,
 			       r ? _("unable to update local ref") : _("forced update"),
@@ -892,6 +883,8 @@ static int store_updated_refs(const char *raw_url, const char *remote_name,
 				ref->force = rm->peer_ref->force;
 			}
 
+			if (recurse_submodules != RECURSE_SUBMODULES_OFF)
+				check_for_new_submodule_commits(&rm->old_oid);
 
 			if (!strcmp(rm->name, "HEAD")) {
 				kind = "";
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index d1b6646f42..b88343d977 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1231,8 +1231,14 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
 	int result;
 
 	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
+
+	/* Pending fetches by OIDs */
+	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;
+	int oid_fetch_tasks_nr, oid_fetch_tasks_alloc;
 };
-#define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP }
+#define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, \
+		  STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, \
+		  NULL, 0, 0}
 
 static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
 				    struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf)
@@ -1259,6 +1265,76 @@ static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
 	return spf->default_option;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Fetch in progress (if callback data) or
+ * pending (if in oid_fetch_tasks in struct submodule_parallel_fetch)
+ */
+struct fetch_task {
+	struct repository *repo;
+	const struct submodule *sub;
+	unsigned free_sub : 1; /* Do we need to free the submodule? */
+
+	struct oid_array *commits; /* Ensure these commits are fetched */
+};
+
+/**
+ * When a submodule is not defined in .gitmodules, we cannot access it
+ * via the regular submodule-config. Create a fake submodule, which we can
+ * work on.
+ */
+static const struct submodule *get_non_gitmodules_submodule(const char *path)
+{
+	struct submodule *ret = NULL;
+	const char *name = default_name_or_path(path);
+
+	if (!name)
+		return NULL;
+
+	ret = xmalloc(sizeof(*ret));
+	memset(ret, 0, sizeof(*ret));
+	ret->path = name;
+	ret->name = name;
+
+	return (const struct submodule *) ret;
+}
+
+static struct fetch_task *fetch_task_create(struct repository *r,
+					    const char *path)
+{
+	struct fetch_task *task = xmalloc(sizeof(*task));
+	memset(task, 0, sizeof(*task));
+
+	task->sub = submodule_from_path(r, &null_oid, path);
+	if (!task->sub) {
+		/*
+		 * No entry in .gitmodules? Technically not a submodule,
+		 * but historically we supported repositories that happen to be
+		 * in-place where a gitlink is. Keep supporting them.
+		 */
+		task->sub = get_non_gitmodules_submodule(path);
+		if (!task->sub) {
+			free(task);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
+		task->free_sub = 1;
+	}
+
+	return task;
+}
+
+static void fetch_task_release(struct fetch_task *p)
+{
+	if (p->free_sub)
+		free((void*)p->sub);
+	p->free_sub = 0;
+	p->sub = NULL;
+
+	if (p->repo)
+		repo_clear(p->repo);
+	FREE_AND_NULL(p->repo);
+}
+
 static struct repository *get_submodule_repo_for(struct repository *r,
 						 const struct submodule *sub)
 {
@@ -1286,39 +1362,29 @@ static struct repository *get_submodule_repo_for(struct repository *r,
 static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			      struct strbuf *err, void *data, void **task_cb)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = data;
 
 	for (; spf->count < spf->r->index->cache_nr; spf->count++) {
-		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
 		const struct cache_entry *ce = spf->r->index->cache[spf->count];
 		const char *default_argv;
-		const struct submodule *submodule;
-		struct repository *repo;
-		struct submodule default_submodule = SUBMODULE_INIT;
+		struct fetch_task *task;
 
 		if (!S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))
 			continue;
 
-		submodule = submodule_from_path(spf->r, &null_oid, ce->name);
-		if (!submodule) {
-			const char *name = default_name_or_path(ce->name);
-			if (name) {
-				default_submodule.path = name;
-				default_submodule.name = name;
-				submodule = &default_submodule;
-			}
-		}
+		task = fetch_task_create(spf->r, ce->name);
+		if (!task)
+			continue;
 
-		switch (get_fetch_recurse_config(submodule, spf))
+		switch (get_fetch_recurse_config(task->sub, spf))
 		{
 		default:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_DEFAULT:
 		case RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ON_DEMAND:
-			if (!submodule ||
+			if (!task->sub ||
 			    !string_list_lookup(
 					&spf->changed_submodule_names,
-					submodule->name))
+					task->sub->name))
 				continue;
 			default_argv = "on-demand";
 			break;
@@ -1329,11 +1395,11 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/", spf->prefix, ce->name);
-		repo = get_submodule_repo_for(spf->r, submodule);
-		if (repo) {
+		task->repo = get_submodule_repo_for(spf->r, task->sub);
+		if (task->repo) {
+			struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
 			child_process_init(cp);
-			cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->gitdir);
+			cp->dir = task->repo->gitdir;
 			prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(&cp->env_array);
 			cp->git_cmd = 1;
 			if (!spf->quiet)
@@ -1343,12 +1409,22 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 			argv_array_pushv(&cp->args, spf->args.argv);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, default_argv);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
+
+			strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/",
+						       spf->prefix,
+						       task->sub->path);
 			argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
 
-			repo_clear(repo);
-			free(repo);
-			ret = 1;
+			spf->count++;
+			*task_cb = task;
+
+			strbuf_release(&submodule_prefix);
+			return 1;
 		} else {
+
+			fetch_task_release(task);
+			free(task);
+
 			/*
 			 * An empty directory is normal,
 			 * the submodule is not initialized
@@ -1361,12 +1437,38 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
 					    ce->name);
 			}
 		}
+	}
+
+	if (spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr) {
+		struct fetch_task *task =
+			spf->oid_fetch_tasks[spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr - 1];
+		struct strbuf submodule_prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
+		spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr--;
+
+		strbuf_addf(&submodule_prefix, "%s%s/",
+			    spf->prefix, task->sub->path);
+
+		child_process_init(cp);
+		prepare_submodule_repo_env_in_gitdir(&cp->env_array);
+		cp->git_cmd = 1;
+		cp->dir = task->repo->gitdir;
+
+		argv_array_init(&cp->args);
+		argv_array_pushv(&cp->args, spf->args.argv);
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "on-demand");
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, submodule_prefix.buf);
+
+		/* NEEDSWORK: have get_default_remote from submodule--helper */
+		argv_array_push(&cp->args, "origin");
+		oid_array_for_each_unique(task->commits,
+					  append_oid_to_argv, &cp->args);
+
+		*task_cb = task;
 		strbuf_release(&submodule_prefix);
-		if (ret) {
-			spf->count++;
-			return 1;
-		}
+		return 1;
 	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1374,20 +1476,66 @@ static int fetch_start_failure(struct strbuf *err,
 			       void *cb, void *task_cb)
 {
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = cb;
+	struct fetch_task *task = task_cb;
 
 	spf->result = 1;
 
+	fetch_task_release(task);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int commit_missing_in_sub(const struct object_id *oid, void *data)
+{
+	struct repository *subrepo = data;
+
+	enum object_type type = oid_object_info(subrepo, oid, NULL);
+
+	return type != OBJ_COMMIT;
+}
+
 static int fetch_finish(int retvalue, struct strbuf *err,
 			void *cb, void *task_cb)
 {
 	struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = cb;
+	struct fetch_task *task = task_cb;
+
+	struct string_list_item *it;
+	struct oid_array *commits;
 
 	if (retvalue)
 		spf->result = 1;
 
+	if (!task || !task->sub)
+		BUG("callback cookie bogus");
+
+	/* Is this the second time we process this submodule? */
+	if (task->commits)
+		goto out;
+
+	it = string_list_lookup(&spf->changed_submodule_names, task->sub->name);
+	if (!it)
+		/* Could be an unchanged submodule, not contained in the list */
+		goto out;
+
+	commits = it->util;
+	oid_array_filter(commits,
+			 commit_missing_in_sub,
+			 task->repo);
+
+	/* Are there commits we want, but do not exist? */
+	if (commits->nr) {
+		task->commits = commits;
+		ALLOC_GROW(spf->oid_fetch_tasks,
+			   spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr + 1,
+			   spf->oid_fetch_tasks_alloc);
+		spf->oid_fetch_tasks[spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr] = task;
+		spf->oid_fetch_tasks_nr++;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+out:
+	fetch_task_release(task);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
index 6c2f9b2ba2..9f8c744eb5 100755
--- a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
+++ b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh
@@ -600,4 +600,121 @@ test_expect_success "fetch new commits when submodule got renamed" '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success "fetch new submodule commits on-demand outside standard refspec" '
+	# add a second submodule and ensure it is around in downstream first
+	git clone submodule sub1 &&
+	git submodule add ./sub1 &&
+	git commit -m "adding a second submodule" &&
+	git -C downstream pull &&
+	git -C downstream submodule update --init --recursive &&
+
+	git checkout --detach &&
+
+	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "new change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/1 $C &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
+	test_tick &&
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "new change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/2 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/3 $E &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/3:refs/heads/my_branch &&
+		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commit on-demand in FETCH_HEAD' '
+	# depends on the previous test for setup
+
+	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/4 $C &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
+	test_tick &&
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/5 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/6 $E &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/6 &&
+		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commits on-demand without .gitmodules entry' '
+	# depends on the previous test for setup
+
+	git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.sub1 &&
+	git add .gitmodules &&
+	git commit -m "delete gitmodules file" &&
+	git checkout -B master &&
+	git -C downstream fetch &&
+	git -C downstream checkout origin/master &&
+
+	C=$(git -C submodule commit-tree -m "yet another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C submodule update-ref refs/changes/7 $C &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $C submodule &&
+	test_tick &&
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "yet another change outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/8 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+	E=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/9 $E &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/9 &&
+		git -C submodule cat-file -t $C &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git checkout --recurse-submodules FETCH_HEAD
+	)
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'fetch new submodule commit intermittently referenced by superproject' '
+	# depends on the previous test for setup
+
+	D=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "change 10 outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	E=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "change 11 outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+	F=$(git -C sub1 commit-tree -m "change 12 outside refs/heads" HEAD^{tree}) &&
+
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/10 $D &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $D sub1 &&
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/11 $E &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $E sub1 &&
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+
+	git -C sub1 update-ref refs/changes/12 $F &&
+	git update-index --cacheinfo 160000 $F sub1 &&
+	git commit -m "updated submodules outside of refs/heads" &&
+
+	G=$(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
+	git update-ref refs/changes/13 $G &&
+	(
+		cd downstream &&
+		git fetch --recurse-submodules origin refs/changes/13 &&
+
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $D &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $E &&
+		git -C sub1 cat-file -t $F
+	)
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.20.0.rc2.230.gc28305e538
Junio C Hamano· Dec 9, 2018, 01:57 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCH] fetch: ensure submodule objects fetched

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
Show 31 quoted lines
> Currently when git-fetch is asked to recurse into submodules, it dispatches
> a plain "git-fetch -C <submodule-dir>" (with some submodule related options
> such as prefix and recusing strategy, but) without any information of the
> remote or the tip that should be fetched.
>
> But this default fetch is not sufficient, as a newly fetched commit in
> the superproject could point to a commit in the submodule that is not
> in the default refspec. This is common in workflows like Gerrit's.
> When fetching a Gerrit change under review (from refs/changes/??), the
> commits in that change likely point to submodule commits that have not
> been merged to a branch yet.
>
> Fetch a submodule object by id if the object that the superproject
> points to, cannot be found. For now this object is fetched from the
> 'origin' remote as we defer getting the default remote to a later patch.
>
> A list of new submodule commits are already generated in certain
> conditions (by check_for_new_submodule_commits()); this new feature
> invokes that function in more situations.
>
> The submodule checks were done only when a ref in the superproject
> changed, these checks were extended to also be performed when fetching
> into FETCH_HEAD for completeness, and add a test for that too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
> ---
>
> Thanks Jonathan for the review!
> So it looks like only the last patch needs some improvements,
> which is why I'd only resend the last patch here.
> Also note the test with interious superproject commits.
Sorry, can't parse the last sentence.
Anyway, will replace the last step with this.  Thanks.
Junio C Hamano· Dec 5, 2018, 03:10 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip,
> with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it
> without range-diff, but would ask for full review.

Is that a "resend" or reroll/update (or whatever word that does not imply "just sending the same thing again")?

FWIW, here is the range diff between 104f939f27..@{-1} and master.. after replacing the topic with this round.

 3:  304b2dab29 !  3:  08a297bd49 submodule.c: sort changed_submodule_names before searching it
    @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
     @@
      	/* default value, "--submodule-prefix" and its value are added later */
      
    - 	calculate_changed_submodule_paths();
    + 	calculate_changed_submodule_paths(r);
     +	string_list_sort(&changed_submodule_names);
      	run_processes_parallel(max_parallel_jobs,
      			       get_next_submodule,

Just the call nearby in the context has become repository-aware; no change in this series.

 4:  f7345dad6d !  4:  16dd6fe133 submodule.c: tighten scope of changed_submodule_names struct
...
    ++	calculate_changed_submodule_paths(r, &spf.changed_submodule_names);
     +	string_list_sort(&spf.changed_submodule_names);
      	run_processes_parallel(max_parallel_jobs,
      			       get_next_submodule,

I do recall having to do these adjustments while merging, so not having to do so anymore with rebasing is a welcome change ;-)

 5:  5613d81d1e !  5:  bcd7337243 submodule: store OIDs in changed_submodule_names
...
Likewise.
 7:  e2419f7e30 !  7:  26f80ccfc1 submodule: migrate get_next_submodule to use repository structs
    @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
     
         We used to recurse into submodules, even if they were broken having
         only an objects directory. The child process executed in the submodule
    -    would fail though if the submodule was broken.
    +    would fail though if the submodule was broken. This is tested via
    +    "fetching submodule into a broken repository" in t5526.
     
         This patch tightens the check upfront, such that we do not need
         to spawn a child process to find out if the submodule is broken.
    @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@
     +		strbuf_repo_worktree_path(&gitdir, r, "%s/.git", sub->path);
     +		if (repo_init(ret, gitdir.buf, NULL)) {
     +			strbuf_release(&gitdir);
    ++			free(ret);
     +			return NULL;
Leakfix?  Good.
     +		}
     +		strbuf_release(&gitdir);
    @@ -75,11 +77,10 @@
     +		if (repo) {
      			child_process_init(cp);
     -			cp->dir = strbuf_detach(&submodule_path, NULL);
    - 			prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array);
     +			cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->worktree);
    + 			prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array);

Hmph, I offhand do not see there would be any difference if you assigned to cp->dir before or after preparing the repo env, but is there a reason these two must be done in this updated order that I am missing? Very similar changes appear multiple times in this range-diff.

      			cp->git_cmd = 1;
      			if (!spf->quiet)
    - 				strbuf_addf(err, "Fetching submodule %s%s\n",
     @@
      			argv_array_push(&cp->args, default_argv);
      			argv_array_push(&cp->args, "--submodule-prefix");
    @@ -94,8 +95,12 @@
     +			 * the submodule is not initialized
     +			 */
     +			if (S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode) &&
    -+			    !is_empty_dir(ce->name))
    -+				die(_("Could not access submodule '%s'"), ce->name);
    ++			    !is_empty_dir(ce->name)) {
    ++				spf->result = 1;
    ++				strbuf_addf(err,
    ++					    _("Could not access submodule '%s'"),
    ++					    ce->name);
    ++			}
OK, not dying but returning to the caller to handle the error.
 9:  7454fe5cb6 !  9:  04eb06607b fetch: try fetching submodules if needed objects were not fetched
    @@ -17,11 +17,6 @@
         Try fetching a submodule by object id if the object id that the
         superproject points to, cannot be found.
     
    -    The try does not happen when the "git fetch" done at the
    -    superproject is not storing the fetched results in remote
    -    tracking branches (i.e. instead just recording them to
    -    FETCH_HEAD) in this step. A later patch will fix this.
    -
         builtin/fetch used to only inspect submodules when they were fetched
         "on-demand", as in either on/off case it was clear whether the submodule
         needs to be fetched. However to know whether we need to try fetching the
    @@ -29,6 +24,10 @@
         function check_for_new_submodule_commits(), so we'll also run that code
         in case the submodule recursion is set to "on".
     
    +    The submodule checks were done only when a ref in the superproject
    +    changed, these checks were extended to also be performed when fetching
    +    into FETCH_HEAD for completeness, and add a test for that too.
    +
OK.
         Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
         Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
     
    @@ -41,30 +40,39 @@
      
...

The range-diff output for this step is unreadble for me, but the code around this area does not seem to appear in the comparison between the result of applying these directly to master and the result of merging the previous round to master, so perhaps this is just an indication that later follow-up fix has been squashed into this step or something, which I shouldn't have to worry about.

      diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
      --- a/submodule.c
    @@ -73,8 +81,10 @@
      	int result;
      
      	struct string_list changed_submodule_names;
    -+	struct get_next_submodule_task **fetch_specific_oids;
    -+	int fetch_specific_oids_nr, fetch_specific_oids_alloc;
    ++
    ++	/* The submodules to fetch in */
    ++	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;
    ++	int oid_fetch_tasks_nr, oid_fetch_tasks_alloc;

OK. The task struct has been renamed and the new name makes more sense ("getting the next submodule" is less important than "what we are going to do to that submodule").

...      
    -+struct get_next_submodule_task {
    ++struct fetch_task {
     +	struct repository *repo;
     +	const struct submodule *sub;
     +	unsigned free_sub : 1; /* Do we need to free the submodule? */
...
     +	return (const struct submodule *) ret;
     +}
     +
    -+static struct get_next_submodule_task *get_next_submodule_task_create(
    -+	struct repository *r, const char *path)
    ++static struct fetch_task *fetch_task_create(struct repository *r,
    ++					    const char *path)
     +{
    -+	struct get_next_submodule_task *task = xmalloc(sizeof(*task));
    ++	struct fetch_task *task = xmalloc(sizeof(*task));
     +	memset(task, 0, sizeof(*task));
     +
     +	task->sub = submodule_from_path(r, &null_oid, path);
     +	if (!task->sub) {
    -+		task->sub = get_default_submodule(path);
    ++		/*
    ++		 * No entry in .gitmodules? Technically not a submodule,
    ++		 * but historically we supported repositories that happen to be
    ++		 * in-place where a gitlink is. Keep supporting them.
    ++		 */
    ++		task->sub = get_non_gitmodules_submodule(path);
    ++		if (!task->sub) {
    ++			free(task);
    ++			return NULL;
    ++		}
    ++
     +		task->free_sub = 1;
OK.
    -+		if (!task->sub) {
    -+			free(task);
    +-		}
    ++		task = fetch_task_create(spf->r, ce->name);
    ++		if (!task)
     +			continue;
    - 		}

OK, so the code used to signal the need to work with the presense of task->sub but now task's NULLness is used, so no need to free.

    @@ -231,24 +253,26 @@
     +			return 1;
      		} else {
     +
    -+			get_next_submodule_task_release(task);
    ++			fetch_task_release(task);
     +			free(task);
     +
OK.
    -+		/* NEEDSWORK: have get_default_remote from s--h */
    ++		/* NEEDSWORK: have get_default_remote from submodule--helper */
;-)
Stefan Beller· Dec 6, 2018, 21:59 UTC · re: Junio C Hamano · lore

Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:10 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
>
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
> > This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip,
> > with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it
> > without range-diff, but would ask for full review.
>
> Is that a "resend" or reroll/update (or whatever word that does not
> imply "just sending the same thing again")?

As you noticed, it is an actual update. I started to use resend as DScho seems very unhappy about the word reroll claiming we'd be the only Software community that uses the term reroll for an iteration of a change.

I see how resend could sound like retransmission without change.
Show 11 quoted lines
>                         child_process_init(cp);
>      -                  cp->dir = strbuf_detach(&submodule_path, NULL);
>     -                   prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array);
>      +                  cp->dir = xstrdup(repo->worktree);
>     +                   prepare_submodule_repo_env(&cp->env_array);
>
> Hmph, I offhand do not see there would be any difference if you
> assigned to cp->dir before or after preparing the repo env, but is
> there a reason these two must be done in this updated order that I
> am missing?  Very similar changes appear multiple times in this
> range-diff.

Jonathan Tan asked for it to be "diff friendly". This -of course- is range-diff unfriendly.

> [...]

you seem to be OK with a lot of the changes, I did not find an actionable suggestion.

Thanks for still queuing topics during -rc time, Stefan

Josh Steadmon· Dec 7, 2018, 00:25 UTC · re: Stefan Beller · lore

Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

On 2018.11.28 16:27, Stefan Beller wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> This is a resend of sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip,
> with all feedback addressed. As it took some time, I'll send it
> without range-diff, but would ask for full review.
> 
> I plan on resending after the next release as this got delayed quite a bit,
> which is why I also rebased it to master.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan

I am not very familiar with most of the submodule code, but for what it's worth, this entire series looks good to me. I'll note that most of the commits caused some style complaints, but I'll leave it up to your judgement as to whether they're valid or not.

Reviewed-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Jonathan Nieder· Jan 15, 2019, 01:38 UTC · re: Josh Steadmon · lore

Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] Resending sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip

Josh Steadmon wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I am not very familiar with most of the submodule code, but for what
> it's worth, this entire series looks good to me. I'll note that most of
> the commits caused some style complaints, but I'll leave it up to your
> judgement as to whether they're valid or not.
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>

For what it's worth, we've been running with this at Google (using the sb/submodule-recursive-fetch-gets-the-tip branch from "pu") for more than a month, with no user complaints.

Tested-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

← back to recent threads