# FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test fails for the wrong reasons

4 messages from 2018-04-06 to 2018-04-06. Participants: Jonathan Primrose, Jeff King.
Thread: https://gitlist.dev/t/48232

## Jonathan Primrose, 2018-04-06 18:06

Subject: FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test fails for the wrong reasons
Message-ID: <82c91eac-9dc4-834b-4648-3c4ba45af80d@gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/82c91eac-9dc4-834b-4648-3c4ba45af80d%40gmail.com

```
A while ago, the configure test for FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES was changed
to (attempt to) check for a NULL result from fopen. Unfortunately, the
test will always fail - because it won't compile. The code snippet in
configure.ac translates to:

return f);

Either there's an extra ) or a missing (. A cast to int wouldn't hurt
either.

I'd supply a patch to fix this, but I'm not sure what the results of
suddenly fixing the test would be. It seems to work well on my
machine, but I don't stress git much here, and it's just one machine.

```

## Jeff King, 2018-04-06 19:33

Subject: Re: FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test fails for the wrong reasons
Message-ID: <20180406193301.GA11450@sigill.intra.peff.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20180406193301.GA11450%40sigill.intra.peff.net
In-Reply-To: <82c91eac-9dc4-834b-4648-3c4ba45af80d@gmail.com>

```
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:06:50PM -0400, Jonathan Primrose wrote:

> A while ago, the configure test for FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES was changed
> to (attempt to) check for a NULL result from fopen. Unfortunately, the
> test will always fail - because it won't compile. The code snippet in
> configure.ac translates to:
> 
> return f);
> 
> Either there's an extra ) or a missing (. A cast to int wouldn't hurt
> either.

Oops. This is due to my 3adf9fdecf (configure.ac: loosen
FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test program, 2017-06-14).

Neither I nor the original tester noticed, because we're on Linux, which
needs that set.

> I'd supply a patch to fix this, but I'm not sure what the results of
> suddenly fixing the test would be. It seems to work well on my
> machine, but I don't stress git much here, and it's just one machine.

I think it should be fixed (and agreed on the "int" thing; the return
value should be "f != NULL" or similar).

I don't know autoconf very well, but is there a way to invoke it that
will let us know if a test-program fails to compile at all? Obviously
for probing the system compler/includes, "does not compile" is an
expected possible outcome. But for tests like this it's really a
tristate: yes, no, or something went horribly wrong.

-Peff

```

## Jonathan Primrose, 2018-04-06 21:57

Subject: Re: FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test fails for the wrong reasons
Message-ID: <8ed8491f-9410-c509-5ef7-77638aa74038@gmail.com>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/8ed8491f-9410-c509-5ef7-77638aa74038%40gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20180406193301.GA11450@sigill.intra.peff.net>

```
On 04/06/2018 03:33 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:06:50PM -0400, Jonathan Primrose wrote:
>
>> A while ago, the configure test for FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES was changed
>> to (attempt to) check for a NULL result from fopen. Unfortunately, the
>> test will always fail - because it won't compile. The code snippet in
>> configure.ac translates to:
>>
>> return f);
>>
>> Either there's an extra ) or a missing (. A cast to int wouldn't hurt
>> either.
>
> Oops. This is due to my 3adf9fdecf (configure.ac: loosen
> FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test program, 2017-06-14).
>
> Neither I nor the original tester noticed, because we're on Linux, which
> needs that set.

I'm also running Linux, but somehow I ended up needing to check
config.log and saw the error. I don't remember why I had to check.
(I've been fixing the problem locally for the last few releases,
figuring someone else would notice. I also remove the 'rm configure'
from the distclean target in Makefile, just in case I decide to
rebuild later.)
>
>> I'd supply a patch to fix this, but I'm not sure what the results of
>> suddenly fixing the test would be. It seems to work well on my
>> machine, but I don't stress git much here, and it's just one machine.
>
> I think it should be fixed (and agreed on the "int" thing; the return
> value should be "f != NULL" or similar).

Ironically, most of the time I check config.log is because of the
missing cast to int. A few years ago I set this machine up as a
tri-arch system (x86, x86_64, and x32). Because of subtle errors
that appear when converting between int and pointer on x32, I
tend to use -Werror=int-conversion on all my builds, and I wrap
configure in a script that (among other things) checks config.log
for that particular error. Even though x32 isn't as promising
anymore (thanks to a few projects rejecting support patches),
there are very few packages that still trigger the error.
>
> I don't know autoconf very well, but is there a way to invoke it that
> will let us know if a test-program fails to compile at all? Obviously
> for probing the system compler/includes, "does not compile" is an
> expected possible outcome. But for tests like this it's really a
> tristate: yes, no, or something went horribly wrong.

I don't know if that's supported. From what I've seen in the docs I've
found online, it looks like the closest is a case for "I couldn't run
the program because I'm cross-compiling." You might be able to
determine that the compile and/or link failed by looking at some of
autoconf's internal variables, but it would be fragile.
>
> -Peff
>

Jonathan

```

## Jeff King, 2018-04-06 22:07

Subject: Re: FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test fails for the wrong reasons
Message-ID: <20180406220736.GH7870@sigill.intra.peff.net>
URL: https://gitlist.dev/e/20180406220736.GH7870%40sigill.intra.peff.net
In-Reply-To: <8ed8491f-9410-c509-5ef7-77638aa74038@gmail.com>

```
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:57:15PM -0400, Jonathan Primrose wrote:

> > Oops. This is due to my 3adf9fdecf (configure.ac: loosen
> > FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES test program, 2017-06-14).
> > 
> > Neither I nor the original tester noticed, because we're on Linux, which
> > needs that set.
> 
> I'm also running Linux, but somehow I ended up needing to check
> config.log and saw the error. I don't remember why I had to check.
> (I've been fixing the problem locally for the last few releases,
> figuring someone else would notice. I also remove the 'rm configure'
> from the distclean target in Makefile, just in case I decide to
> rebuild later.)

I think you'll find that most of the developers don't actually use
autoconf themselves, so bugs tend to go unnoticed there for a while.
(The failure case for setting this flag accidentally is not bad, either;
it just incurs an extra fstat).

-Peff

```