[PATCH] Documentation/githooks: Clarify the behavior of post-checkout hook

Magne Land· Mar 13, 2018, 19:59 UTC · lore

From: Magne Land <magne.land@appfolio.com>

This can happen when using 'git rebase -i’: could not detach HEAD

Based on discovering this Stack Overflow discussion:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25561485/git-rebase-i-with-squash-cannot-detach-head
---
 Documentation/githooks.txt | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Show changes to Documentation/githooks.txt +3 −2

diff --git a/Documentation/githooks.txt b/Documentation/githooks.txt
index f877f7b7cd19c..3a4e027d0d175 100644
--- a/Documentation/githooks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/githooks.txt
@@ -166,7 +166,9 @@ worktree.  The hook is given three parameters: the ref of the previous HEAD,
 the ref of the new HEAD (which may or may not have changed), and a flag
 indicating whether the checkout was a branch checkout (changing branches,
 flag=1) or a file checkout (retrieving a file from the index, flag=0).
-This hook cannot affect the outcome of 'git checkout'.
+
+If this hook exits with a non-zero status, 'git checkout' will exit with the
+same status.
 
 It is also run after 'git clone', unless the --no-checkout (-n) option is
 used. The first parameter given to the hook is the null-ref, the second the

--
https://github.com/git/git/pull/470

Jonathan Nieder· Mar 14, 2018, 00:38 UTC · re: Magne Land · lore

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/githooks: Clarify the behavior of post-checkout hook

Hi,

Magne Land wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> From: Magne Land <magne.land@appfolio.com>
>
> This can happen when using 'git rebase -i’:
> could not detach HEAD
>
> Based on discovering this Stack Overflow discussion:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25561485/git-rebase-i-with-squash-cannot-detach-head
> ---
>  Documentation/githooks.txt | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Thanks for investigating and writing this.

May we forge your sign-off? See Documentation/SubmittingPatches section [[sign-off] 'Certify your work' for more about what this means.

The above leaves one question unanswered: is this the *right* behavior for "git checkout" to have? I.e. is it useful for "git checkout" to fail when the post-checkout hook fails, or would it be better for it to e.g. simply print a message and exit with status 0?

Not a rhetorical question: I'm asking because I don't know the answer. What do you think?

Thanks, Jonathan

Show 13 quoted lines

> --- a/Documentation/githooks.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/githooks.txt
> @@ -166,7 +166,9 @@ worktree.  The hook is given three parameters: the ref of the previous HEAD,
>  the ref of the new HEAD (which may or may not have changed), and a flag
>  indicating whether the checkout was a branch checkout (changing branches,
>  flag=1) or a file checkout (retrieving a file from the index, flag=0).
> -This hook cannot affect the outcome of 'git checkout'.
> +
> +If this hook exits with a non-zero status, 'git checkout' will exit with the
> +same status.
>  
>  It is also run after 'git clone', unless the --no-checkout (-n) option is
>  used. The first parameter given to the hook is the null-ref, the second the

patchDocumentation/githooks: Clarify the behavior of post-checkout hook