... then jast squsash them w/o questioning.
Is this a valid RFE ?
-- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
threads / discuss / 46337
enhancement request : If 2 commits to be squashed together do have the same title and comment ...
Subject: enhancement request : If 2 commits to be squashed together do have the same title and comment ...
Junio C HamanoRe: enhancement request : If 2 commits to be squashed together do have the same title and comment ...
Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> writes:
> ... then jast squsash them w/o questioning. > > Is this a valid RFE ?
In the form, it is valid---sending a message to git@vger.kernel.org is the right way to describe a problem and ask for a help (or better yet, propose a solution ;-).
I am guessing that you are talking about "squash" in "rebase -i" command? If so, instead of saying "squash", you can say "fixup", which will squish the change into the commit to be corrected while retaining the log message of it, which makes the new feature you are looking for unnecessary, I think.
Unless I misunderstood what you want, that is.
Re: enhancement request : If 2 commits to be squashed together do have the same title and comment ...
On 07/09/2017 08:52 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> In the form, it is valid---sending a message to git@vger.kernel.org > is the right way to describe a problem and ask for a help (or better > yet, propose a solution ;-). > > I am guessing that you are talking about "squash" in "rebase -i" > command? If so, instead of saying "squash", you can say "fixup", > which will squish the change into the commit to be corrected while > retaining the log message of it, which makes the new feature you > are looking for unnecessary, I think. > > Unless I misunderstood what you want, that is.
Thx - answered my questions ! :-)
-- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E